Court Victory for Chiropractors Against Quack Buster, First Amendment Rules

Dr. Stephen Barrett's Claims Did Not Hold Up

By Donna Porter, published Jun 15, 2007
Published Content: 165  Total Views: 371,667  Favorited By: 231 CPs
Rating: 4.7 of 5
Stephen Barrett M.D., known in many circles as a professional quack buster, or "consumer medical advocate", is a hero to some and a long-time scourge to others in the health profession as well as patients.

According to a verdict in the Appeals Court of the State of Pennsylvania, Barrett is the loser in his defamation case against chiropractor Tedd Koren, D.C. Barrett charged Koren with defamation of character and lost, according to a June 14 press release by the World Chiropractic Alliance.

Koren's company, Koren Publications, who markets educational pamphlets for chiropractors, once referred to Barrett as a "Quackpot" and that his vocal nemesis was "de-licensed," and "in trouble."

As a result, Barrett sued Koren for defamation in 2002 and a three-lawyer arbitration panel awarded Barrett damages in the amount of $16,500 and ordered Koren to retract his statements. In October of 2005, Judge J. Brian Johnson of the Pennsylvania court dismissed the lawsuit and ruled in favor of Koren and his First Amendment rights. The Pennsylvania Appeals Court upheld the original court's decision on June 14, 2007.

Barrett's quackery claims, found on his ten-year running web site Quackwatch.com, extend well beyond chiropractic care to many fields in both alternative and allopathic medicine, and include what Barrett deems as " Fad Diagnoses," such as Lyme disease, Gulf War Syndrome, Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome, and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.

Additionally, far-reaching criticisms in position papers and forum discussions involve a plethora of well-known individuals such as Andrew Weil, twice Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling, and Deepak Chopra, among hundreds of others both respected and controversial in their respective fields.

Court Victory for Chiropractors Against Quack Buster, First Amendment Rules
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 22
Next >>
 
Fantastic reporting!

Posted on 02/14/2008 at 5:02:05 AM

 
Donna, I agree with others' comments as well. Well very writen, informative article.

Posted on 07/11/2007 at 8:07:00 AM

 
Five stars again, Donna!

Posted on 07/06/2007 at 9:07:00 AM

 
Thanks for another professional article and excellent reporting.

Posted on 07/04/2007 at 8:07:00 AM

 
Thanks for the great report. This will be an endless debate - but Barrett needs a more diplomatic approach. Weird dude.

Posted on 06/20/2007 at 4:06:00 PM

 
nice work!

Posted on 06/20/2007 at 2:06:00 PM

 
Donna: Just when I believe you couldn't write any better, you get ...way better- this is fantastic writing. The links are great, the whole article smacks of excellence! Way to go! -Dana

Posted on 06/18/2007 at 12:06:00 AM

 
Great article Donna. Very well done.

Posted on 06/17/2007 at 12:06:00 AM

 
Interesting case!

Posted on 06/16/2007 at 8:06:00 PM

 
Great job in reporting.

Posted on 06/16/2007 at 5:06:00 PM

 
Bravo to Donna Porter In Barrett Vs Rosenthal, I recently defeated Stephen Barrett and others from this "quackbuster" gang in the Supreme Court of California. http://www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/ http://www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/BarrettVsRosenthal.htm One warning: They are very vindictive and will probably now come after Donna for daring to report the facts about this case. Bravo to Donna Porter

Posted on 06/16/2007 at 5:06:00 PM

 
Well done and scholarly article on this case. Excellent!

Posted on 06/16/2007 at 5:06:00 PM

 
Great report!

Posted on 06/15/2007 at 10:06:00 PM

 
Interesting report. Thanks. I hadn't heard of this.

Posted on 06/15/2007 at 9:06:00 PM

 
very interesting information...thanks

Posted on 06/15/2007 at 8:06:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 22
Next >>
Most Commented On