Find » Health & Wellness » Home Health Care Workers Not Entitl...

Home Health Care Workers Not Entitled to Minimum Wage

By Mo Morrissey, published Jun 15, 2007
Published Content: 227  Total Views: 108,324  Favorited By: 25 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.4 of 5
The US Supreme Court ruled today that home health care workers are not entitled to the minimum wage provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

Evelyn Coke, a 73-year-old immigrant from Jamaica, filed a lawsuit against her employer Long Island Care at Home to challenge Department of Labor regulations that exempt home care workers from minimum wage and overtime provisions.

Under the Department of Labor (DOL) regulations, "Casual babysitters and persons employed as companions to the elderly or infirm" are specifically exempt from both minimum wage and overtime pay requirements. The FLSA exempts some employees from its overtime pay and minimum wage provisions, but it also exempts certain employees from only overtime pay provisions. The specific regulations state the exemption includes those "companionship" workers "employed by an . . . agency other than the family or household using their services."

The Attorney representing Ms. Coke argued the congressional intent was in neighbor to neighbor relations and not in third party employment relationships. The court rejected this notion, but Justice Bryer, who wrote the opinion of the court, while acknowledging the court should defer to the DOL rule, registered the opinion that it was indeed "bad public policy."

In the court decision, the court states the Fair Labor Standards Amendments of 1974 exempted from the minimum wage and maximum hours rules of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA) persons "employed in domestic service employment to provide companionship services for individuals . . . unable to care for themselves." 29 U. S. C. §213(a)(15).

Home Health Care Workers Not Entitled to Minimum Wage
Takeaways
  • Home health care workers are not entitled to the minimum wage provisions of the FLSA
  • Casual babysitters and persons employed as companions to the elderly or infirm are exempt
  • The court says this exemption is "bad public policy" but did not change it
Comments
Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
 
Thanks all for your comments. If you note, the Court essentially said they didn't like the result much, but their decision puts the responsibility for changing the statute back on the legislature.

Posted on 06/16/2007 at 6:06:00 PM

 
I guess now its up to the consumer to set things right by refusing to do business with an agency that pays their employees less than minimum wage with no overtime. They should also inquire about the number of hours caregivers are forced to work, because now there's no maximum and I think its dangerous to overwork someone and then charge them with the care of another. I don't think it would take long for agencies to straighten up if they lost all of their customers because the customers didn't trust an underpaid, overworked caregiver to care for their parents.

Posted on 06/16/2007 at 3:06:00 PM

 
This is a terrible precedent. Aren't the elderly and infirmed worth more than that?

Posted on 06/16/2007 at 9:06:00 AM

 
that flat-out sucks.

Posted on 06/16/2007 at 12:06:00 AM

 
This seems really unfair. Well written! Sophie

Posted on 06/15/2007 at 7:06:00 PM

 
That is horrible! I don't want someone making less than minimum wage caring for my elderly family members or myself! Since you get what you pay for, I'll take my chances at a nursing home.

Posted on 06/15/2007 at 5:06:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
Advertisment