Find » Opinion/Editorial » The School Uniform in Public School...

The School Uniform in Public Schools Debate

Why Now May Be the Time for School Uniforms in Public Schools

By L. Warren, published Jun 26, 2007
Published Content: 49  Total Views: 25,605  Favorited By: 3 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.0 of 5
It was in the late 1960's that school dress codes (and the general belief that a certain type of attire was expected in the "serious" educational setting) began to be eliminated. Before that there was no need to think about school uniforms for public schools. Private schools tended to require uniforms, but they served a purpose within that context. For the most part, anyone who saw a schoolyard full of public-school students saw children and teenagers who were dressed reasonably well.

Girls were required to wear dresses, jumpers, or skirts. Since they wore only dresses, jumpers or skirts they wore shoes that went with dresses, jumpers or skirts. Boys were required to wear dress shirts of any color. Neckties were required, although string ties were an acceptable alternative for which most boys opted. (Today the word, "string", conjures up a few completely different images, doesn't it?) Boys' shirts could be short-sleeved in Spring. Boys of secondary-school age were required to either wear or pullover sweater or jacket to school. Jeans were not allowed. Neither were T-shirts or sweatshirts (except for sports), particularly those with pictures or words on them. Students had gym uniforms (that were generally despised by all girls).

There was always the occasional boy or two in any class who tried showing up in a black T-shirt and black pants, and such boys would be given a lecture in the principle's office. Once "mini-skirts" showed up on the scene there there were always a few girls who didn't know the difference between a short skirt and a way-to-short skirt, and rules about a hem needing to touch the floor if the girl kneeled were instituted. The reasonably lenient (and yet detested by the students) dress codes that prohibited "Garrison belts", super-short skirts, low-necklines, T-shirts on boys, super-long hair on boys, and super-teased hair on girls were said to be "archaic" back in the 60's, when my generation decided it was time to change the world, though, so many schools eliminated dress codes around that time.

Comments
Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
I hate uniforms! i have them in school currently. atrocious plaid. It took away the only thing i had in school, my personality. To compensate for my lost feelings, i covered my notebooks in pictures and my book covers in drawings. Of course, the teacher decided this wasn't right either and took even that priviledge away. I think that there may be reasons to why people dress stupid and they will have to deal with their own consequences. Why burden those who just want to express themselves in a healthy way? If anything why give them plaid!? Here's an idea, make a committee of chosen students pick out the uniforms. Then we would vote, even if they still stink in the end, we would at least feel like we had a say in it.

Posted on 11/28/2008 at 7:11:02 AM

 
Samantha, thanks for the comments. Everyone has their thoughts on the matters, and all are respected. The money argument has never particularly been one I favor either. Even though I'm not "radical" about any need for uniforms, I do think kids can express their personalities after school and on weekends; and it may not be such a bad thing for them to learn that there are times in life when we have "to go with the program". I don't think expectations with regard to behavior or dress is a bad thing. Also, too, there may be something to be said for young people learning to express themselves in ways that are more meaningful than just what clothes they wear. I'm not sure, either, that the sense of belonging or shared "school look" kids with uniforms can have may not. give them more of a sense of belonging to a "team" or community larger than themselves. A lot of kids actually love their unforms - baseball, football, cheerleader, school, dance team, etc. Again, thanks.

Posted on 06/23/2008 at 8:06:56 PM

 
I, for one, believe that school uniforms are wrong. A child has the right to express himself or herself through their clothing (provided it covers the right areas and contains no nudity, violence or bad language.) The money argument really gets me because here, kids have to wear khaki pants and a blue or white shirt. The kids aren't stupid - they know if they are Tommy Hilfiger khakis or wal-mart khakis. But - it's just my opinion! Great, informative article.

Posted on 06/23/2008 at 6:06:38 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Advertisment