The Arctic National Wildlife: Time to Say Enough
By Belinda Richardson, published Oct 03, 2007
Published Content: 1 Total Views: 45 Favorited By: 0 CPs
Those who are in favor of oil development in the ANWR claim that it can be done with minimal impact on the environment. A study of the history of oil development in Alaska will prove that the oil industry spends billions of dollars on a system that is based on profits rather than protection of the environment. Environmental studies document "the oil industry's "disturbing record" of non-compliance with state and federal laws and regulations designed to protect the environment". For example, a BP Amoco subcontractor was found guilty in 1995 of illegally injecting hazardous waste back into the groundwater. The BP contractor instructed workers to put toxic materials into the drilling wastes that were re-injected as part of routine drilling operations in order to save BP $1,000 to $1,500 per barrel of waste. The oil companies have a poor track record when it comes to protecting the environment.
You may also like...
- America Must Collar the Oil Companies, Free Electric Car Batteries, and Tax Oil
- Gas Price Conspiracy Revealed!
- Global Warming and Its Affects on the Arctic
- How To Pump Gas Into A Vehicle
- How the United States Became Gas Dependent
- Natural Gas Line Rupture Leaves More Than 2,200 Customers in the Cold in Gunnison County, Colorado
- Gas Saving Tips: Common Fallacies
- Saving Oil
- The End of the Oil Age
- Bushy and His Oil Well Drillers in the Arctic
Most Commented On


PEDRO
Add a Comment
Posted on 11/29/2007 at 7:11:00 PM