Study: Circumcision Removes Most Sensitive Penis Parts

By kHong, published Jun 19, 2007
Published Content: 41  Total Views: 12,692  Favorited By: 3 CPs
Rating: 4.1 of 5
Studies have found that there are five sensitive areas to a male penis. Ultimately, researchers aim to discover how circumcision affects what a man feels. Circumcision involves the removal of skin that covers the tip of the penis, also called the foreskin, and is the most commonly used medical procedure used in new born infants in the United States. In a finding detailed in the British Journal of Urology (BJU) International, an estimated 60 percent of male babies are subject to this surgery.

According to Live Science, Morris Sorrells of the National Organization of Circumcision Information Resources Center and fellow researchers mapped out a "penis sensitivity map" by measuring the sensitivity of 19 locations on the penises of 159 male volunteers. Out of the 159 participants, 91 of the people were circumcised as infants and surprisingly, the data showed that none had a history of penile or sexual dysfunction.

According to the researcher's findings, the most sensitive region of a male penis is the circumcision scar on the underside of the penis. For uncircumcised penises, the most sensitive areas were five regions that were normally removed during the circumcision procedure. All five of these regions were more sensitive than the most sensitive part of the circumcised penis.

The surgical process is practiced in several different countries including the United States. It is done for medical as well as cultural reasons throughout. Scientists studying sexual diseases agree that circumcision at a young age offers a degree of protection against contracting infections and sexual diseases. Recent studies have shed new light on this protective ability of circumcision, and researchers have stated that the procedure can lower the risks of HIV infection up to 60 percent in sex between males and females.

Study: Circumcision Removes Most Sensitive Penis Parts
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 17
Next >>
 
Well im looking on here because i have a problem with going or should i say NOT going i am circumsized. And to the guy that doesn't like going every 30 seconds I WISH!! My partner thinks its her fault cause i last forever and she cant take it anymore so im looking for somthing to make me more sensative so that i can go. Dont get me wrong i can go but it takes along time and normally the girl cant last as long so sex kinda sucks for me!!

Posted on 06/10/2008 at 5:06:37 PM

 
had it done when i was 15 and regret it , of course your glans loses sensativity, its, always exposed secondly for intact man be happy that you have your foreskin to protect your glans and for circumcised guys injoy what you have and everybody move on. Your born with something for a reason ,if you say it's not mutilation when the kids born your all dumbasses, 80 % of men worldwide are intact and fine.

Posted on 03/05/2008 at 9:03:08 AM

 
I am a circumsized man who lasts a long time. I still feel much pleasure during sex but do not have the urge to cum after 30 seconds. After talking with several friends who are not circumsized, I have come to the conclusion that the foreskin that protects the penis head makes the head more sensitive decreasing the time it takes to ejaculate. It would be difficult to prohibit circumcison and would lead to parents getting circumcisions done in back alleys or they themselves performing the surgery. Let us not turn to government to solve our problems and instead turn to common sense. Common sense says that guys should get circumsised to properly pleasure their partner without ejaculating in 30 seconds.

Posted on 12/18/2007 at 8:12:55 PM

 
well lets hear it from me? am not circumcised and to be honest its ok... now let me explain the good and the bad on my experinse... well the pines is very very sensitive how sensitive? well lets put it like this... you have sex for about 30 to 1 minute and you feel like you just wanna cum... its ok.. but it get to the point where it just stress you out because you think ok am done.. but your parner is not satisfy at all... so you have to do something about it... to me I would like to be circumcise just to see if maybe it would not be assensitive as now... girls feel the penis more but you have to concentrate so you last long... yep its that sensitive and it gets me mad a lot of times... I honestly would love to last about 15 minutes having sex then couple seconds or less then 5 minutes... because the way I see it.. I want to satisfy my partner as well you know.. not only just me.. well you guys think about what I said.. its a good thing to have it.. but there is also the down things a

Posted on 09/09/2007 at 12:09:00 AM

 
What I can say about this issue? There are two sides of a coin "the circumcised ones will never know if there's truth to it, on the other hand, the uncircumcised ones (luckier species) can still explain and give justice as to whether the claim is true or not since they can still have the option to get circumcised!" So, uncircumcised guys, come on state your opinion!

Posted on 07/07/2007 at 4:07:00 AM

 
It's not the parents choice; they don't have to live with it or be attached to the penis. Circumcision INCREASES an infected man's risk of passing HIV on to other partners once he has contracted it himself.

Posted on 06/27/2007 at 4:06:00 PM

 
Aww.. it cut me off, "I'll add what I said at the end" Some are great with being circumcised... cause they dont have the extra skin to get in the way.. like my friend said eariler .. he is a male, He said... it is a pain not being circumcised.. cause the skin does get in the way.. sometime's but it also provides pleasure.. but I believe without it I'd be alot happier.. (N Yes that is true.. not just making stuff up) Really it's everyones own opinon.. and how they pleasure them selves.. cause some people do it better n differently .. some people are still sensitive... some are only half ?. And just like to add again.. "When I have My intercoarse moments.. I can still do it right after I have ejaculated... and I have been circumcised.. so yea.. It's really everyone's own opinon.. on this subject

Posted on 06/20/2007 at 7:06:00 AM

 
Ah my bad.. I meant "Was" not "Wasn't" (In the beginning)

Posted on 06/20/2007 at 7:06:00 AM

 
Hm.... I just like to state... yes in some cases it's okay to keep the "Foreskin" and not get the circumcision but yes this is the parents choice, Cause also there's a 50% chance that your son/Son's could have hivs.. or anything of the sort.. your really gambling like jamie k wilson stated out.. 1 of the 3 of her sons had to get circumcised.. cause there was trouble ( see just by that alone I can stand my case.. that it is smart to circumcise your Son.. or son's ) Cause he wouldn't of had to go through that trouble.. if he wasn't circumsised.. eariler.. n there wouldve been no problem, Correct ? Maybe.. but most likely yes.. so it is very smart to circumcise... oh and "Laugh Out Loud?" Even tho I was Circumcised I still have alot of pleasure.. and am very sensitive.. and unless your a "Male" Then you cant make that remark... Male's and female's all experience there "Plessureable moments differently" Some are better.. some are bad.. some are great with being circumsised.. cause they don

Posted on 06/20/2007 at 7:06:00 AM

 
My daily torture continues in its 11th year

Posted on 06/19/2007 at 4:06:00 PM

 
I have no intention of starting a circumcision debate, but on a personal level I see no difference between male circumcision and female genital mutilation. The more I learned about male circumcision, the less I was able to differentiate between male circumcision and female circumcision. Most people are in an uproar over the practice of FGM claiming it's barbaric, but so many people in the U.S. claim male circumcision is a parental choice. Using that logic, female circumcision would have to be a parental choice as well.

Posted on 06/19/2007 at 12:06:00 PM

 
Dear Anonymous: You should take note that when calling others idiots that proper grammar and spelling should be used. It is technically "YOU'RE an idiot," and not "YOUR an idiot." Ah, the irony!

Posted on 06/19/2007 at 12:06:00 PM

 
I agree with you 100% Katherine. It should be illegal until such a time as the male himself is able to make his own decision.

Posted on 06/19/2007 at 12:06:00 PM

 
I wouldn't make it illegal, but I certainly agree that chopping a piece off a child who is far too young to make that decision never seemed fair to me. After lots of hard thinking, I didn't circumcise any of my three sons. The oldest one had a problem and had to be circumcised later -- a one in a thousand thing, his doctor said -- but the other two have been just fine. My philosophy is, if they were born with it, there's a reason for it to be there.

Posted on 06/19/2007 at 11:06:00 AM

 
forcing my personal beliefs? What to say it should be illegal so non-consenting newborn boys don't have to go thru having part of thier body cut off? Do some more research and you'll find that removal of the forskin has a huge impact on sex. And the aids argument is also flawed... keep reading.

Posted on 06/19/2007 at 11:06:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 17
Next >>
Most Commented On