The Same-Sex Marriage Debate

Why the Argument Against it Has Little Logical Basis

By Hal El, published Apr 27, 2006
Published Content: 1  Total Views: 250  Favorited By: 0 CPs
Rating: 3.2 of 5
With the success of shows like "Will and Grace" , "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy" and the daytime talk show, "Ellen", the American public seems more accepting of queer culture compared to previous decades.  However, Bush's use of same-sex marriage as a political platform to secure the votes of wavering conservatives proved otherwise.  Though it is undebatable that the queer lifestyle is being more and more accepted, compared to other Western countries like Canada and Spain, America is still very conservative in their views on homosexuality.

Bush's talk about including an amendment banning same-sex marriage during his campaign for reelection has been virtually unheard of after winning back the oval office.  However, with the mention of such extreme measures, those in the queer community felt anger and betrayal for possibly being singled out in a national doctrine.  This not only shows Bush's views on stifling a whole population of people, but also that he believes he is important enough to make changes in a document with so much history.

He talked about the sanctity of marriage and protecting the family unit.  Ironically, around the same time, celebrities like Jennifer Lopez and Britney Spears were going through brief marriages and anullments.  The "sanctity" of marriage does not exist nowadays.  The divorce rate is more than 50% which doesn't even include all the people that are unfaithful in their marriages.  Marriage should not be about religion or politics, it should be about love and committment.

The argument to protect the family unit is also unfounded.  Traditionally, a nuclear family includes a mother and father.  However, now a days, it is hard to protect America's children from learning or experiencing domestic problems firsthand.  A lot of parents are divorced, going through custody battles, dealing with alimony problems, having passionate arguments, deal with domestic violence, or raising children as single parents.  The idea that preventing same sex marriage will protect the family unit is preposterous. 

Takeaways
  • The idea that homosexuality is a sin is based on religion and even that is up for interpretation.
  • People in same sex relationships love each other just as any other heterosexual couple.
  • The traditional idea of marriage does not exist in today's society, even with heterosexual couples
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
 
Same-sex marriage is not "too immoral" compared to infidelity and pre-marital . Rather, there are no "categories" to sin. Careful study of the bible would lead one to see that "a sin is a sin is a sin". There is no hierarchy of sin. "For ALL have sinned and fall short of the glory of God" Romans 3:23. This isn't exempt from evangelicals either.

Posted on 10/09/2006 at 5:10:00 PM

 
There are just too many Evangelicals these days who want to push their religion not only on idividual, personal levels but also in terms of national politics. If same sex marriage is too immoral for Americans then people who cheat and have pre-marrital sex ought to be punished and discriminated against similarly. But that will never happen, will it?

Posted on 05/08/2006 at 1:05:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
Most Commented On