Video Evidence of O.J. Simpson's Guilt

The Camera Doesn't Lie

By Timothy Sexton, published Jun 29, 2007
Published Content: 2,687  Total Views: 2,366,240  Favorited By: 213 CPs
Rating: 4.6 of 5
Although it wasn't truly the "Trial of the Century" the O.J. Simpson trial must be viewed in terms of a milestone in American culture. The O.J. Simpson trial also should be proof-positive that there is no such thing as controlled psychic ability. I mean if there was anyone out there who could predict the future based on claims of "vibes" or "psychic energy" surely this trial that became the primary focus of daily attention for tens of millions of people every single day for almost a year produced enough of that energy to have enabled at least one of these people to have seen it coming. Yet no one did. But the most lasting impression of the O.J. Simpson trial that I have is also the one that further cements my belief that, yes, O.J. did it. All of you out there who still have doubts that O.J. was guilty should really clink on this link to a You Tube video clip of the announcement of the verdict. What you will witness is, I truly believe, the most damning evidence against O.J. Simpson that exists and it is one that can't be manipulated by Simpson's crooked lawyers or bungled by those moronic L.A. prosecutors.

Takeaways
  • Robert Kardashian handled the infamous missing luggage.
  • Robert Kardashian "saved" O.J. from killing himself.
  • Robert Kardashian is no Johnnie Cochran.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
 
only a damn fool believes oj waqs innocent.

Posted on 05/03/2008 at 1:05:49 PM

 
This case turned on the difference in two (2) films: the first film came about because of an adminsitrative order which took rise from the Rodney King Case - now all crime scenes in LA have to be filmed - (but Furman either forgot about it or he did not know) - it was made several days before Furman signed a requisition to film the crime scene and Simpsons' Home. The first film showed no blood in Simpsons' Home and his bedroom is spotless, but Furman's film is an indictment of Furman's EVIDENCE TAMPERING and he should have gone to jail immediately. Otherwise, blindness is nothing but pure pretense on the part of this white society not to see that Eto should have called a mistrial. But he did not do that because someone apparently AND WHO probably appointed him (Eto)to the bench got in touch with Eto. Check the two films and their date and time so that you mob of hangmen can stop running your mouths!

Posted on 10/16/2007 at 4:10:00 PM

 
Did Robert Blake do it, also? He was another one that I wondered about? Do you believe he killed his wife? Let me know if you find any evidence on him. I always believed he did it.

Posted on 09/23/2007 at 6:09:00 AM

 
amazing article! thanks for the different perspective

Posted on 07/05/2007 at 10:07:00 AM

 
Very interesting.

Posted on 06/29/2007 at 10:06:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
Most Commented On