Iraq War, 2008 Election Media Coverage Lacking, Research Suggests

By C.M. Paulson, published Jun 25, 2007
Published Content: 169  Total Views: 215,270  Favorited By: 4 CPs
Rating: 3.0 of 5
According to research conducted by Pew Research Center (Link to Pew Research Center Website), both the quantity and quality of media coverage regarding the Iraq War and the 2008 presidential election are not aligned with what the American public is seeking.

The Pew Research Center completes its Top Story Index (Link to Top Story Index) on a weekly basis to "compare and contrast - on an ongoing basis -- the news agenda of the media with the news agenda of the public." In its most recent comparison (for the week of June 11), the Pew Research Center found that while 33% of Americans followed the Iraq War closely, only 7% of the overall news coverage was devoted to this issue.

Because of differences in time periods measured, as well as differences in what is actually measured (percentage of media coverage versus percentage of people seeking media coverage) the site cautions that "while the two gauges are roughly comparable, they are not strictly equivalent." However, the overall media coverage of immigration and the Palestinian conflict exceeded that of the Iraq War during this period, even though the American interest in the Iraq War almost double that of any other story.

The American public also sought increased information on the 2008 presidential election, with 10% of Americans saying that this was the main story that they were following and 7% of media coverage actually given to the 2008 elections. A June Pew Research Center study shows that even when the media covers the presidential elections, Americans are somewhat dissatisfied with the coverage provided (Link to Political Divide in Views of Campaign Coverage). The report, titled "Political Divide in Views of Campaign Coverage," states that:

- 76% of Americans are seeking more information on candidates' positions

- 57% of Americans are seeking more information regarding the presidential debates

- 54% of Americans are seeking more information regarding the candidates' backgrounds

- 54% of Americans are seeking more information regarding "candidates who are not frontrunners"

Iraq War, 2008 Election Media Coverage Lacking, Research Suggests

Iraq War and 2008 Election media coverage is not necessarily meeting Americans' needs

Credit: Stacy Brasw

Copyright: Stacy Brasw

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
 
hi, well i ddnt nOe dere wasa a war bcOz here in the land of Oz they shOw usless things on the news instead Of things that relly matta. buht anywayss. x

Posted on 05/31/2008 at 9:05:59 PM

 
to Micah continued: Perhaps candidates do use Public Relations agencies. In the case of Senator Obama his website reflects the same views he held prior to throwing his hat in the ring; so I doubt that anyone is telling the man what "message" to put on his site. Do you think we can get Jacques Bourlerice elected, because he has not comprimised himself by raising millions? The ability to inspire people who have never contributed to a campaign or never voted before might be the mark of a leader that can inspire citizens to take community action rather than wait upon the government to it for them. The alternative is to vote for no one and have the same old type of corrupt government we have been getting for years.

Posted on 07/19/2007 at 8:07:00 PM

 
Oops already read this one. To Micah: Granny D walked and skied into Washington DC to get campaign finance election reform. It does cost money to run a 30 second spot on a television station. It is sad that our tax dollars do not provide a forum for the candidates to speech~for free. Before Granny D started walking large contributors could "buy" favors. (ex Pres Bill Clinton is an example of this) Today the empahsis is large numbers of small contributors. What I meant about Senator Obama was he has a record breaking number of individual contributors, which made headlines all over the news, but not at AC.

Posted on 07/19/2007 at 8:07:00 PM

 
One reason campaigning costs so much is the use of Public Relations agencies to determine a candidate's message, including what goes on their website. Rule of thumb: If a candidate can raise millions to even get in the game, then they've already been compromised in their duty to serve the public good. Good piece.

Posted on 07/07/2007 at 2:07:00 PM

 
Quite interesting. AC is "the people's media" and I notice the types of "breaking news stories" featured on the front page. It seems they favor manufactured stories about Paris and jail or the latest dirt on Britney to local news that are not readily available except from someone local. I also noticed that Ron Paul's fundraising made the front page, whereas Senator Obama, who's efforts were record breaking did not. I do not rely on the media, but visit candidates websites as my first source of info.

Posted on 07/04/2007 at 11:07:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
Most Commented On