The Future of Medical Use of Marijuana - State Vs. Federal Power

State Legislatures Are Increasingly Supportive and the Public Wants It

By Jim Stillman, published Jul 02, 2007
Published Content: 149  Total Views: 75,810  Favorited By: 45 CPs
Rating: 4.8 of 5
There have been several articles in this space with regard to the use of medical marijuana, upon the recommendation of a physician, to ease the pain of those suffering specific diseases. The first was concerned with the case of Bernie Ellis, an acknowledged activist and sometime consultant to state and Federal agencies, who was prosecuted by the U.S. Justice Department for growing and possessing a small amount of cannabis to help him endure pain and for offering the same drug to others similarly afflicted, at no cost. The piece discussed the respective roles of the Federal and state governments and how the former has taken charge. The second was an article discussing the dilemma faced by physicians who can lose their license by facilitating the utilization of marijuana by those who have a medical need, all as allowed by state law. The third article discussed the penalty of forfeiture upon conviction of a drug offense and how Mr. Ellis could lose an extremely valuable farm.

The controversy arises in those states which have enacted laws permitting the utilization of cannabis, upon a physician's recommendation. Such laws, in the opinion of the Federales, do not protect someone from prosecution and, upon conviction, substantial prison sentences.

A disclaimer and personal note.

This article does not relate to purely recreational use of marijuana. In case anyone cares, I hold no brief for the use of marijuana or any drug, including alcohol, for the purpose of escaping reality. I have seen too many instances where drugs have left a person unable to work, function in an adult productive manner or have rational thoughts.

Effectiveness of cannabis for medical purposes

Marijuana has been used for medical purposes for nearly 5,000 years. Until its use was effectively eliminated in 1937 in the United States, it was a component of many medicines used in this country. It is said that the increasing usage of cannabis as a recreational drug made its medical use problematical.

Marijuana -- a probable benefit to ill people but denied because of Federal attitudes

Credit: WP Clip Art

Copyright: Public domain

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
 
Again, I wholeheartedly agree with you! I really enjoy reading your posts.

Posted on 11/13/2007 at 3:11:00 PM

 
good information, Jim..and good arguements for decriminalization.

Posted on 07/10/2007 at 10:07:00 PM

 
Very good and informative article, Jim. Just on a side note, Madison, WI has a city ordinance that allows the use (even recreational) of a certain quantity of marijuana. As long as you're not involved in marijuana's actual sale, you can actually use it, and local law enforcement can't do a thing about it!

Posted on 07/03/2007 at 12:07:00 PM

 
First of all, that's a real nice leaf in the picture. I, like yourself, don't smoke the stuff anymore but am 110% in favor of it's decriminalization and, in fact, legalization. Research has shown over and over that THC is much less harmful to the body and mind than things like alcohol and tobacco. If it alleviates pain and reduces suffering, what is the justification for keeping it illegal? Your article is constructed very well and your analysis of the issues and conclusions are strong and balanced. And did I say how pretty that picture is.

Posted on 07/03/2007 at 11:07:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
Most Commented On