Improve Your Writing with the Textalyser Keyword Tool

It's Not Just for Keyword Counting

M. M. Lyons' article on keywords had an interesting way to explain keywords: "
The powers that pay are looking for you to generate traffic to the site so that they can make their income, and thereby pay you yours. Keyword density is your literary call girl. Textalyser wants to be your madam." I seldom check keyword density because I've been working my business long enough that I have no need for a madam to tell me whether my keywords are working their business or not. But Textalyser does more than calculate keyword density. Look at the information you have to scroll past to get to the keywords:

Number of words:
Number of different words:
Complexity factor (Lexical Density):
Readability (Gunning-Fog Index):
(6-easy 20-hard)
Average Syllables per Word :
Sentence count:
Average sentence length (words):
Max sentence length (words):
Min sentence length (words):

The three calculations I put in bold text might help you improve your writing. They are not, of themselves, measures of quality. However, high-quality writing seldom falls too far outside these parameters.

Complexity factor (Lexical Density [LD]) = (Number of different words / Total number of words) x 100

A score of 40-60 is average. A high score indicates that you seldom repeat words. A low score indicates that you are repeating many words. Whether this is good or bad depends on your purpose and audience.

Texts with a lower lexical density are more easily understood because they use the same word for the same concept wherever it appears. Red is red, not red, crimson, vermilion and scarlet. Overviews and roundups tend to score high, but so do rambling rants about the meaning of life and the injustices it inflicts on you. Children's books and writing meant for non-native speakers tends to have low scores.

If your writing scores above 60 or below 40, take a second look at it. Read it out loud to make sure it sounds OK. Make sure you aren't bringing in synonyms just because your English teacher said you should. Make sure you aren't mindlessly repeating keywords where you would normally use a referential pronoun such as "it" or "he" or a generic word like "auto".

Related information
 
Comments 1 - 10 of 23 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

This just answered a few questions I had about a word analyzer. Thanks for the info and good job summarizing everything we need to know from the measurements.

Posted on 12/03/2008 at 4:12:56 AM

This article deserves a standing ovation. Thanks for sharing!

Posted on 11/08/2008 at 4:11:59 PM

I know it's old, but a great find for me! Thanks for the tip about not using synonyms. That is the most difficult habit for me to break right now.

Posted on 08/20/2008 at 10:08:00 PM

Thank you for writing this informative article on textalyser.

Posted on 05/31/2008 at 9:05:46 PM

I use Textalyser a lot, but one thing about it bothers me. You'll see this after you submit some text for textalysing: The complete results, incuding compexity factor, and other features hmmm... incuding compexity factor, ay? Can I get an 'L' ? I emailed them about these typos months ago, and yet they still remain on the site. Otherwise, this is a great free word counting tool (and more!)

Posted on 03/03/2008 at 12:03:54 PM

Thanks for this information. I'm printing it out to use as a future reference.

Posted on 02/02/2008 at 12:02:07 PM

Thanks to you, the Textalyser will be the new word locked in my brain as long as I'm here.

Posted on 01/09/2008 at 9:01:55 AM

Thank you for this article! I looked at some of my writing and can see that I have things to work on. Thanks!

Posted on 12/29/2007 at 3:12:37 PM

Interesting article.

Posted on 11/30/2007 at 11:11:00 PM

I don't believe mathematically analysing my writing can improve my style, but I do know that textanalyser can help earn more here at AC. Earning more at AC doesn't mean you are a better writer by any means - you can sell yourself better. Same thing with SAT scores - doesn't mean you are a dumb person if you get a low one, but high scores aren't smart - they can play the game right and are better test takers.

Posted on 11/19/2007 at 12:11:00 AM

Comments 1 - 10 of 23 Next >>