Religion Defined

What is the purpose of religion if it is about proving the Truth when the Truth is self-evident? There is no appropriate reason for spreading the gospels of any religion when even in itself are tumults void of a resolution. They say it was 'Folly's Dynasty' then. I ask, "Is it any different today?"

If so the scriptures brought about civilization, where is it today? It's not here and most definitely not where the revelations made a debut! To those of you who are adepts in the strokes of perception, I am certain that you hold the key to the Truth and beware when they approach you promising 'Peace' and 'Light'. All that ever proceed from before their tongue and gestures are merely a pretense of so-called 'Righteousness'. The truth remains, that they do not know the Truth of Righteousness. Do not be offended by their show of piety. Trust me they are nowhere close to being close to God.

The Truth is consistent but that does not necessarily indicate that there should be a repetition of facts already included in previous times. Why would G-d repeat what He wants to say when He has said it more than twice already?

God is Almighty and Omnipresent. The religion that limits God to eternal invisibility has just concluded that God has something impossible in all the other things that are possible to Him. If one says everything is possible to God and then says God cannot descend in the form of man, then that is preposterous! Everything is possible and something is impossible, is simply a catastrophic contradiction of logic. Now who is God, God himself or the man who is describing Him?

Besides matters concerning attributes, there is another matter made frivolous in the practice of belief; The Description of Paradise. If so Paradise exists, and where we exist is only a furnace for testing purposes, will the Creator of Heaven describe in detail what Heaven is before we can even get there? Again, preposterous! Perhaps awakening the awareness of the existence of Heaven within us, He may as well. But a creator does not describe his works, he simply leaves it to be observed, cherished or studied by another.