Find » Education » Why History Should Be Mandatory in ...

Why History Should Be Mandatory in Every Single Grade in Every Single School in America

By Timothy Sexton, published Jul 06, 2007
Published Content: 3,220  Total Views: 3,207,733  Favorited By: 278 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.2 of 5
"Those who don't remember history are condemned to repeat it." "The past is always a rebuke to the present." "History teaches everything, including the future." "If you would understand anything, observe its beginning and its development."

Those quotes are from, among others, Robert Penn Warren and Aristotle. There seems to be a general consensus among most great thinkers of the past few thousand years that history may be the single most important subject one can study. History leaves its mark on all other disciplines from languages to science to mathematics. And yet most human beings seem to have a genetic predisposition to ignore history. Thomas Edison is usually credited with inventing the light bulb, but as my article entails that is a lie. The light bulb was around for fifty years before Edison got to it. What Edison did-or rather his French assistant who actually figured things out-was waste years conducting experiments that had already been proven failures by other scientists. If Thomas Edison had been nearly as interested in learning about the past as he was in making sure the future bought into his myth, he could have had time to steal the ideas of countless other assistants. Of course, the most egregious example of the desire to ignore the history books is the Bush administration. This wretched hive of scum and villainy should have their hands cut off with a light saber for their across-the-board refusal to use them to open any of the history books that I feel sure must be in some library within the White House. If the Bush administration can be said to have produced one positive result-and that is certainly the best they can hope for-it is that they have forever illustrated the vital importance of teaching kids history. The years since Bush took office have been a textbook case for showing that an ignorance of history combined with a studious urge to ignore it can result in utter devastation. Anybody who resolutely refuses to learn history succeeds only in creating avoidable problems for themselves down the road.

Comments
Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
 
Excellent article! I recently had a high school student ask me why literature was important - he is from a minority family and had convinced himself that the only things he needed to succeed in life were math and computer skills... "those that don't know history are doomed to repeat it" was part of my answer, as history is commonly portrayed through good literature!

Posted on 07/10/2007 at 8:07:00 AM

 
I'm glad I studied the history of writing before going into that field. ;) Tim, this has to be one of my very favorite articles I've ever read here...and I wish this would be a showcase on the main page! While I think most of us who write here enjoy history, it's something I've held as the center of importance in all education. I do think, unfortunately, that the way history has been taught in public schools might have created a psychological effect of boredom in some students. There are ways of teaching it that can make it compelling, but it does take some creative effort sometimes. Frankly, those "Don't Know Much About..." books written by Kenneth C. Davis should be used in schools. Those are maybe slightly politically biased...but teach the bloody truth of everything that's happened in world history. Teaching the brutal truths of history may be the key to making it more compelling for kids--especially when putting it in context with things happening today.

Posted on 07/07/2007 at 5:07:00 AM

 
Absolutely...I am appalled every time I get into a discussion that involves historical topics with most people. What I would consider the very basic stuff is lost in ignorance to most...

Posted on 07/06/2007 at 9:07:00 PM

 
Outstanding! How anyone can teach history with all the political considerations of not stepping on revisionist toes perplexes me, though.

Posted on 07/06/2007 at 12:07:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
Advertisment