Drug Law Reform: Perils of the Afflicted

Jeanne Sparks-Carreker
Jeanne Sparks-Carreker
  • Published Content: 109
  • Total Views: 78,881
  • Favorited By: 27 CPs
Full Profile | Subscribe | Add to Favorites
ALABAMA COURTROOM-A Caucasian female living in a major city in the south is arrested late one night for unknowingly selling a gram of methamphetamine to an undercover officer. This isn't her first rodeo, however, due to the fact that she had been picked up a few times before on possession charges. E
very time, she had been court ordered into an alternative sentencing program which demanded frequent urine samples on a random basis, as well as her compliance with rehabilitative treatment. Her name is Jane.

For whatever reason, be it her unwillingness to comply with the court-ordered abstinence from her DOC (drug of choice), or non-compliance with the treatment programs orders, Jane failed to meet the courts' demands. Warrants were issued for her arrest and her probation was revoked.

It's a common circumstance in every city in America. Court dockets around the globe, in fact, are filled with drug-related offenses, and every elected authority sitting on the proverbial throne issues the appropriate payment for the addict's sin.

If the charged could afford the same defense that O.J. monetarily secured, there would be gloves which did not fit in her case, also. Of course, the "glove" her costly defense attorney should herald would indeed be one that outsized her hands so much that she would not even have to model them with outstretched hands before the jury box.

First, Jane resides in a country which vigorously protects its citizens' right to freedom of speech. Somehow over the years, this constitutional right (intended to allow the free flow of political thought from the press) now guarantees the freedom of almost any type of artistic expression. She is the citizen of a country which protects a musician's "constitutional right" to publish songs that urge the listener to obtain, sell, and use illicit drugs - even as a way of life.

 
Comments 1 - 7 of 7  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below
No, I don't think Whocares referring to me, Sundance, I've been with the same guy for 20 years. but I figured some may miss my point. you know, I still catch myself singing "Roll Out" by Ludacris sometimes. My point was that the constitution protects the expression of a lifestyle that is punishable by fines and imprisonment. Makes one wonder if it isn't all just one big, lucrative game. I've missed ya, Sundance! Take care :)

Posted on 07/21/2007 at 7:07:00 PM

Jeanne, did you break someone's heart 12 years ago? Does this "whocares" know you? Spooky.

Posted on 07/21/2007 at 1:07:00 PM

whocares - I feel your pain, and am so very sorry that your life has hit this wall of heartache. I really wish you would contact me at h2oforthegaslit@hotmail.com so that we can correspond. I know what it feels like to truly consider death as an escape. Please contact me. I know your harshness was actually the result of pain and frustration in your life right now. I assure you I am not one of those who Eminem refers to as having blamed everything on Marilyn and the heroin (grin). Email me soon.

Posted on 07/16/2007 at 3:07:00 AM

Icare and Whocares - you miss the entire point of the article. First, I was comparing the inequality of our constitution protecting the expression of a lifestyle that, once lived, is then a crime. To say that BS music leads someone to use drugs is a lie. But to punish an addict for having acted upon the symptoms of a disease, while allowing Dayton Family to give a shout-out to fed-killers and drug dealers uniting is just wrong. I don't blame anything for dug use except the act of using drugs. On a side note, as well, my husband (the long-haired dude who put me in the lifestyle that you mentioned?) I was the one who unfortunately pulled him into drug addiction. We were married at 16, had kids, and never used drugs or even hardly drank until our mid to late 20's.

Posted on 07/16/2007 at 3:07:00 AM

I guess the rest of my post got lost in space. Please know that my comments, while somewhat harsh, were NOT meant to put you down, but to LIFT YOU UP...ABOVE the drug lifestyle that clearly is not working for you. (take my comments in context. i do not use illegal drugs, but I am a mess amd the only time I feel "normal" is when Ive had more to drink than i should. The best I can tell, one can drink themself to death in our country as long as we dont drive drunk . Not that "death" is the goal. I lost every single reason I had to live more than a dozen years ago. While I drink more than I think is ideal (1-3 times per week), I still feel pretty bad about it. I drink in excess because I lost the ONE & ONLY love of my life. There is no substitute.

Posted on 07/14/2007 at 8:07:00 PM

Thats just BS ! I empathasise with your drug problem but blaming BS music, much that wasnt even BORN when you were ?? Come on. Are you REALLY suggesting your children dont know that those BS lyrics are nothing but BS ?? You are an excellent writer ! Just dont go blaming BS music for drug addiction & sales. Anymore than fat people can blame frosted flakes commercials ! Addiction is a nasty thing. But one does not go into it blindly. YOU KNEW THE RISKS !! YOU BLEW THEM OFF !! YOU WERE COOL !! You married someone who put you in that lifestyle because you wanted the THRILL ! (long-haired dope-smoking FM type) You didnt want some guy that had his life together withOUT drugs. Well, the THRILL has a downside and its Tutwieler. Show me a female user who did not get MULTIPLE chances before being imprisoned long term ! While it may not be pleasant, a drug addiction CAN be transfered to "LEGAL" alchohol. If you drink enough. No, its probably not as good a hig

Posted on 07/14/2007 at 8:07:00 PM

Thank you, Judy! No, I normally do not give up exclusives :) Thanks for commenting!

Posted on 07/14/2007 at 5:07:00 PM

Comments 1 - 7 of 7 

Have more to say?
Become a Content Producer on AC

Most Comments Today