Are Church and State Already Separate?

Should Church and State Be Separate If They Are Not Already?

By Emma Schwartz, published May 08, 2006
Published Content: 1  Total Views: 150  Favorited By: 0 CPs
Rating: 3.2 of 5
The First Amendment of the Constitution was not intended to deny the role that religion plays in society or hinder the practice thereof; the First Amendment was written to be the foundation for the fundamental rights that members of society have. As Philip Hamburger wrote in his book Separation of Church and State, in recent times, the “wall of separation between church and state” (4) that Thomas Jefferson constructed is constantly being disbanded by numerous incidents. Current controversies such as prayer in schools, vouchers for religious schools, the use of the bible in public school curriculums and faith-based initiatives sponsored by even the President run counter to the original ideals of the founding fathers. This laxity of interpretation and enforcement of the Constitution and entanglement of religion is overwhelmingly detrimental to our society and the freedom that so many people have fought for over the past few centuries.

From the beginning of its existence religion has spawned numerous conflicts, controversies and differences of opinion. For every sect, faction, element and denomination there exists multiple issues that lead to arguments. There are organizations as well as individuals who are staunch supporters of having religion involved with aspects of public life. These proponents fight for their beliefs on a daily basis. Some of the parents and religious officials who share these views fight arduously to have the bible be readmitted into public school curriculums. These people also struggle to allow- as well as encourage- prayer in school. Those who see little hope for prevailing opt for creating a slight alternative to allowing religion into public schools. They argue that they should be given vouchers that would help subsidize the cost of sending their child to a religious school. Other more politically minded people who possess similar beliefs see nothing wrong with federally funded faith based initiatives. These people support programs like abstinence only education and battle for the right to keep the federal funding coming.

Takeaways
  • Current controversies such as prayer in schools, vouchers for religious schools, the use of the bibl
  • The case of Engel v. Vitale deals with the First Amendment and its application to the issue of praye
  • By remaining apathetic and allowing such lax interpretation and enforcement of the Constitution the
Resources
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
If you have truly written this on your own, it is no wonder you are on the dean's list. You might want to consider a double major, adding international law. Obviously, our country has a desperate need for brilliant thinkers whether in law or--actually, I find it hard to believe that you really plan to enter into todays manipulative world of miserable politics! My very best wishes to you!

Posted on 05/12/2006 at 11:05:00 AM

 
(Contd from below) Besides helping to solve the continually growing problem of overcrowding classrooms, it seems to me that the problem of religious violation in the voucher system is easily solved by simply using school tax exemptions. These kids don�t attend the government public school (separated by an impenetrable wall from their own religious or private school) so why should they be forced to pay for it? The school tax (which in many states is assessed on real property by each of their various counties annually and even listed on tax statements as �school taxes� which, incidentally, is a fairly large portion of the tax ) could simply be exempted and deducted for non-public school users. The federal share of school taxes returned to individual states would simply be reduced in fair proportion by allowing families paying for �other than public schooling� to take the appropriate deduction on their annual federal income tax forms.

Posted on 05/11/2006 at 10:05:00 PM

 
Well presented, and such an important issue to understand from a constitutional standpoint. While it seems obvious that taking money set aside for public schools and giving it in form of vouchers, or otherwise, to parochial schools would be in clear constitutional violation, still these schools are becoming more and more desired by many American families as so many of them outdistance public schools in learning quality. It seems unfair that a family who chooses parochial education is doubly burdened, by also having to continue pay taxes earmarked for public schools, computers, supplies, etc. that their children are not using. Should they not be exempted from these school taxes so that they and many more families can afford to pay on their own for the desired alternate education, whether private or parochial? This would also slow the growing problem of more and more needed classrooms and for building so many new public schools.

Posted on 05/11/2006 at 9:05:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Most Commented On