The Chinese Room Argument Against Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence and Why it Will Not Equal Human Intelligence
By JudyJiastyle, published May 15, 2006
Published Content: 45 Total Views: 159,821 Favorited By: 0 CPs
Embed:
The Chinese Room is a refutation of the theory that computers can think and mental processes are just interactions between software and hardware. ‘Strong A.I. (Mind, Brains and Science, Searle, 28)’ as termed by John Searle, is the contemporary explanation of the human mental processes. It is a prevalent view amongst many computer scientists such as Herbert Simon and Alan Newell. Even the Turing Test is arguably there to provide an attainable benchmark for true artificial intelligence. However, the argument presented in the Chinese Room example has raised the benchmark for strong A.I. to a level of implausibility. Indeed, it creates a ceiling which digital computers and their algorithmic processes will never be able to break through. Computers as defined by the interaction of programs and hardware are shown to be insufficient for the process of thinking.
You may also like...
- Fallacies in Searle's Chinese Room Argument
- Howard Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences
- Color Theory Essentials for Designers
- The Social Bond Theory ~ Examples and Benefits for Children
- Pre-Doctoral Graduate Personal Emotional Intelligence Assessment
- Thinking Machines: The True Story of Artificial Intelligence
- Evolution Theory Vs the Gap Theory
- How Intelligence Work Strains Lives, Families and More
- Believing in God and Evolution: Where's the Intelligence in the Intelligent Design Model of Creation...
- The String Theory
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Most Commented On

