Poll: Debate Attacks on Obama Has Hurt Clinton

Washington Pundits Are in Disarray

By TOMBARI BONKOO, published Jul 31, 2007
Published Content: 53  Total Views: 33,984  Favorited By: 2 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.8 of 5
The tactical and deliberate attack mood that the Hillary Clinton's campaign took at Barack Obama last week has comeback to hurt them in the latest American Research Group poll. Sen. Obama, who was at a distance second or third in most of the polls before the CNN/Tube debate, is now leading in New Hampshire and South Carolina, and he is in a relatively good position in Iowa.

In the ARG poll, Clinton is having the highest unfavorable rating in Iowa, New Hampshire and even South Carolina. Among the top tier candidates, Obama is having the lowest unfavorable rating -- a clear sign that he has more room to grow.

According to the poll released today, in the three key states, Clinton is suffering a devastating unfavorable rating that according to those on the ground in these states, her unfavorable rating may not have a downward turn, but an upward stretch.

Voters are seeking a consensus-building, not a polarizing, president. They see that such polarizing tactics employed by both Clinton and Bush in the past 14 years, have not yielded any intended political results for the American people. This is the sentiment shared across party line.

In the aftermath of the CNN/Youtube debate, various focus groups across the country gave a resounding winning score to Sen. Obama for his genuine and out Washington conventional wisdom answer to issues affecting people across the country. But as expected, the Washington pundits overwhelmingly in jubilation poured encomiums on Hillary Clinton for her canned and as-usual remarks.

As the Republican Party and their war mongering crowds are desperately looking for ways to level the blames of the Iraqi war on both parties, they were so happy that Hillary gave the kind of answer that truly ends the monopolistic blame they (the Republicans) bear for the senseless foreign policies of the past 6 years.

Hillary Clinton enjoying the praise-singing from the Washington pundits and the Republican Party, brutally went after Mr. Obama the following day calling him "irresponsible and naïve" for his willingness to audience our potential enemies.

Poll: Debate Attacks on Obama Has Hurt Clinton
Date: December 31, 1969
Washington D.C, DC USA
Takeaways
  • Obama leading in South Carolina, New Hampshire and in a relative good position in Iowa.
  • The Clinton's machine are in disarray over how to handle Mr. Obama.
  • Bill Clinton called for a truce yesterday after seeing the suicidal blunder the campaign committed.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 12 of 12
 
 
And Obama has hurt obama as well thru his association with Wright and others.

Posted on 03/31/2008 at 4:03:09 PM

 
Its almost sad of whats happened since this was written, because the article is pretty good! The truth is, polls only make sense when you understand the people that are being polled. Some people lie, while others are torn by targeted questions. Their are several factors at play in the failure of the polls in New Hampshire, but not one of them includes some crazy, unrealistic conspiracy theory of some Clinton operation to fool everyone. Polls in their nature must be taken with a grain of salt. Hillary is the best candidate out there, and she's going to win the general election whether liberals like it or not. The irony of that! Liberals should want their party to win! This election is about issues, and not personality.

Posted on 01/20/2008 at 7:01:35 PM

 
I am inclined to think that those who post the polls are just using it as a strategy for Clinton. Otherwise their polls are sheer lies;they don't at all rereflect what is on ground. Come 2008 Obama's victory will put these lies in broad day light.

Posted on 08/06/2007 at 3:08:00 AM

 
OBAMA IN 2008.

Posted on 08/05/2007 at 1:08:00 PM

 
Senator Clintons campaign team seems not to understand the gravity of the situation now,But with that brilliant response from Senator Obama on Foreign policy;it puts him on a center stage not only in primary election but also on a national level.This Havard product is just spreading the right ghospel at a right time.I don't know where America will be without Obama in 08.it will be agreat mistake.Am ready to support Obama all the way.Clinton is finished.Thanks

Posted on 08/04/2007 at 8:08:00 AM

 
I don't mind Hillary so much, she just sounds so rehearsed when she speaks, though. There's just no natural cadence to her voice. I amazes me she's made it this far without having at least a semi-natural delivery.

Posted on 08/01/2007 at 10:08:00 AM

 
My concern is not whether he (Mr. Obama)will be nominated, is how soon this happens.It is also good to keep things the way they are, high polls for Edwards or Ms. Clinton and so on for a while. Their IQ do not belong in the same league, I am afraid.Barack is too smart for these guys, lets face it.

Posted on 08/01/2007 at 4:08:00 AM

 
Susan, Oh, really? Well, most of the people I speak to are Hillary supporters. I guess that says all one needs about anecdotal commentary. I love the highly selective polling information given out in this piece. The last time I checked, Hillary had INCREASED her lead over Obama since the last debate. Moreover, Obama's poll numbers are flat while Hillary's have increased. Just keep hatin', Net Nerds, it's Hillary in '08! Sorry. :(

Posted on 08/01/2007 at 4:08:00 AM

 
I have wondered for sometime why the polls consistently show Clinton in the lead, when nearly everyone I speak with even where I live in - a predominantly Republican, rural area - is an enthusiastic Obama supporter. This includes young adults to the elderly around here. My son is serving in Iraq and he says the overwhelming majority of his fellow soldiers are also Obama supporters. Who do the pollsters ask? I hope Obama continues to define his candidacy, campaign aggressively, and refute suggestions that he is inexperienced. I can't see where conventional "experience" has gotten us lately.

Posted on 07/31/2007 at 5:07:00 PM

 
Senator Clinton has had her eye on the Presidency for a long time. She probably thought she was a shoe-in for the nomination, until Senator Obama joined the race at the urging of citizens. As I woman, I wish I could give her my support, but she lost my vote when she voted yes to go to Iraq. The country needs a change from Reagen/Bush-Bush-Clinton-Bush. I don't much hold with polls, surveys and pundints. If the voting is kept clean, the voting booth will show who the public favors. Great info; well presented.

Posted on 07/31/2007 at 5:07:00 PM

 
Senator Clinton has had her eye on the Presidency for a long time. She probably thought she was a shoe-in for the nomination, until Senator Obama joined the race at the urging of citizens. As I woman, I wish I could give her my support, but she lost my vote when she voted yes to go to Iraq. The country needs a change from Reagen/Bush-Bush-Clinton-Bush. I don't much hold with polls, surveys and pundints. If the voting is kept clean, the voting booth will show who the public favors. Great info; well presented.

Posted on 07/31/2007 at 5:07:00 PM

 
I totally agree with this article. The American start to realize that it is time for change. It is also time to include everybody in the process of building this country. In this country we need to change our broken healthcare system. Thanks, KOKOU AGBEMADI

Posted on 07/31/2007 at 5:07:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 12 of 12
 
Most Commented On