Earmarking Our Way to Oblivion
By J.J. Jackson, published Aug 04, 2007
Published Content: 103 Total Views: 10,360 Favorited By: 6 CPs
Embed:
James Madison once remarked, "with respect to the two words 'general welfare,' I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators." In writing that letter to James Robertson, he reiterated the sentiments he shared with the nation in Federalist 41 where he denounced objections by the anti-Federalists to the term "general Welfare" being included in the Constitution because of it's presumption of an unlimited and open ended scope as without "color".The fear of federally elected politicians being able to curry favor with their constituents by bringing home the bacon in the sense of tax dollars was why under the Constitution our government was given only limited powers to tax and spend. The founders knew that what have become known as "earmarks" would not serve this nation well and would corrupt the intent of limited government.
Why did Madison and the vast majority of Federalists say that the "general Welfare" clause was limited to the set conditions that followed? So that leaders of our government couldn't buy votes!
Over the years since however we have basically amended the Constitution through court orders and legislation (neither of which are means by which such action can be achieved mind you) to say to heck with all that nonsense! And we see where it is now getting us. "General Welfare" has come to mean anything and everything some politico in Washington can dream up.
What do we have today? We have Republican Congressmen from Alaska like Senator Ted Stevens and Representative Don Young that are kings of pork barrel spending and who year after year take money home to their state for pet projects such as the affectionately called "bridge to nowhere" among many, many others.
We have people like Rep. Sam Farr, Democrat, CA who pushed for $25 million to benefit spinach growers to be added to an "emergency" supplemental spending bill. Must be some spinach "emergency" we are not aware of!
You may also like...
- The Constitution for Dummies (i.e. Ron Paul Supporters)
- It is Time to Stop the Pork in Congress for Good
- Congressional Scandal
- Private Jet Charter One-Way Pricing
- The Doomsday Bill: Congress After September 11
- A Better Way
- Let God's Way Be the Way
- So - What's the Best Way to Treat Acne?
- View Files in a New Way
- Cooking Series 1.1 - Quick & Easy way to Peel a Potato
Most Commented On


Alyce Rocco
Add a Comment
Posted on 08/11/2007 at 5:08:00 PM