Claims of Baghdad Diarist Confirmed

By Paul Tenny, published Aug 06, 2007
Published Content: 20  Total Views: 5,814  Favorited By: 1 CPs
Rating: 1.9 of 5
Over the past eight months, an anonymous author has been writing diaries for The New Republic purportedly based on his personal experiences as a solider serving in Iraq. Nicknamed the 'Baghdad Diarist' by my anonymous editor at Associated Content and Matt Drudge, that solider revealed his own identity in a public statement published by TNR after conservative magazine The Weekly Standard accused him of not being a soldier in the American armed forces and of fabrication.

William Kristol wrote an editorial for Weekly Standard where he is an editor, entitled "They Don't Really Support the Troops", briefly mentioning the then growing scandal over the identity and veracity of the Baghdad Diarist. In his article, Kristol accused liberals and Democrats of turning against the troops serving in Iraq for supporting what he believed to be false, defamatory, and in many instances shocking claims - all without a single shred of evidence that the diarist was lying.

Weekly Standard reprinted many comments from veterans - many of them also anonymous - supposedly debunking every radical claim printed by The New Republic. A great many of them were ripe with flaws of their own and even under the best of circumstances, they only amounted to unsubstantiated speculation.

Once the diarist revealed himself as Scott Thomas Beauchamp, a Private stationed at Forward Operating Base Falcon, criticism immediately turned from "he's not a real solider" to "he's lying because all that stuff is impossible". Prominent conservative pundits such as Michele Malkin had a field day with the controversy, insisting still that nothing Beauchamp said could possibly be true, either because other veterans said so, or because they were so terrible that believing an American solider would be capable of such cruelty was to accept that American armed forces were not the perfect angles we all wish they could be.

As was the case with Kristol and Malkin, they would take that logic and twist it until to them, it meant that anyone who would listen to Beauchamp's claims "Don't Really Support the Troops."

U.S. Army soldiers in Baghdad.

Credit: U.S. Government

Copyright: U.S. Government

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 22
Next >>
 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/03/AR2007120301978.html

Posted on 12/26/2007 at 4:12:50 AM

 
LIBERAL LIES EXPOSED: So it's now Dec. 2007, and The New Republic has finally issued its retraction, hoping we've all forgotten by now about how they've tried to bash our troops and bamboozle the public. Now as WE progress into the age of the CITIZEN REPORTER, we should all bookmark Associated Content editorials like this one and the snake oil salesmen who write them- this way future generations can look back and laugh at how deceptive and silly the Liberal Media had become by the end of George Bush's presidency - - "After nearly five months of mounting criticism, the New Republic yesterday disavowed reports about petty wartime cruelty in Iraq, saying the magazine had lost faith in the Army private who wrote them. "We cannot be confident that the events in his pieces occurred in exactly the manner that he described them," Editor Franklin Foer wrote of the dispatches by Scott Thomas Beauchamp. "Without that essential confidence, we cannot stand by these stories." http://w

Posted on 12/26/2007 at 4:12:33 AM

 
Beauchamp was not even in Iraq when he was supposedly writing this diary "on the ground". Just more trash from the the New Nazi rag.

Posted on 08/14/2007 at 5:08:00 PM

 
Does anyone actually read any of these articles before posting? It's just "liberal liars" "conservative liars"... Think for a bit. Your military superior comes to you and says "soldier, did you do all those bad things you wrote about, 'cause if you did, I might just go Tillman on your backside." "No, sir, I didn't." "Any of you other soldiers do any of those bad things he wrote about?" "Sir, no sir!" Military panel declares the stories are unverifiable, so they must be fake. All is well in Iraq. Nothing to see here. Move along. Geeezus, people. Wake up.

Posted on 08/08/2007 at 2:08:00 AM

 
Stop defending liars.!!!!! Beau CHUMP is married to a New Republic reporter/researcher, Elspeth Reeve. Attn: Paul Tenny ---- The only thing confirmed about this is that he is full of b.s. and lies.

Posted on 08/08/2007 at 2:08:00 AM

 
Sorry, I need more from the New Republic than a "Yeah, it's true, trust us".

Posted on 08/07/2007 at 3:08:00 PM

 
In response to one of the previous comments - it is beyond childish and immature to suppose that every criticism of the war is a strategy of the "Bush hater media". Can't we go beyond this silly bickering and just accept that wars are terrible ordeals for those involved, especially for the thousands of civilians who suffer the inevitable consequences. These are people like you and me with families, plans, dreams and hopes. Can we start a "Support the Civilians" campaign maybe?

Posted on 08/07/2007 at 12:08:00 PM

 
Good article and thank you for writing this. There are always horror stories in any war, from all sides. Atrocities will inevitably occur when people fight each other. Instead of screaming the very immature statement "Support Our Troops' can't we all just calm down and start supporting compassion, love and humanity -ALL humanity. We are all in this together, we are all the same. War is in itself an atrocity to humankind. Lets find peace within ourselves first and then it will spread.

Posted on 08/07/2007 at 12:08:00 PM

 
Hmm... It seems that if I were to believe everything in all the articles I've read about this, then no one is telling to truth. In this age of "Citizen-reporters" one must be careful to not believe everything one hears or reads. I have a hard time believing any of this name-calling and mud-flinging. Bloggers are not always right, and the media is a for-profit business.

Posted on 08/07/2007 at 8:08:00 AM

 
Brilliant strategy of the Bush-hater media: Write exagerations and lies about the Iraq war and the "bad" economy, then believe what you read. And hope the rest of us do too. Not.

Posted on 08/07/2007 at 1:08:00 AM

 
Continuation of below: "a single apology or acknowledgment of having been wrong, or acting unethically without proof or logic" for your factually wrong, Crayola written article? Well......?

Posted on 08/07/2007 at 12:08:00 AM

 
Beauchamp admitted himself that his articles were nonsense: Pvt. Scott Thomas Beauchamp--author of the much-disputed "Shock Troops" article in the New Republic's July 23 issue as well as two previous "Baghdad Diarist" columns--signed a sworn statement admitting that all three articles he published in the New Republic were exaggerations and falsehoods--fabrications containing only "a smidgen of truth," in the words of our source. Separately, we received this statement from Major Steven F. Lamb, the deputy Public Affairs Officer for Multi National Division-Baghdad: An investigation has been completed and the allegations made by PVT Beauchamp were found to be false. His platoon and company were interviewed and no one could substantiate the claims. According to the military source, Beauchamp's recantation was volunteered on the first day of the military's investigation. So Paul Tinny, he whose "experience" is listed as "High school"; are we going to have to go "without

Posted on 08/07/2007 at 12:08:00 AM

 
Ouch, Eric. Dennis: if you're referring to AC -- good lord, don't lump us all together.

Posted on 08/06/2007 at 10:08:00 PM

 
Also, it's William Kristol.

Posted on 08/06/2007 at 10:08:00 PM

 
The only people more clueless as "journalists" at the New republic are the people at this rag

Posted on 08/06/2007 at 10:08:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 22
Next >>
Most Commented On