Embryonic Stem Cell Research: My Take

Stem cells have the potential to develop into many different cell types in the body. The stem cells can, theoretically, divide without limit to replenish and repair cells such as brain cells, muscle cells, nerve cells and red blood cells. In order to obtain stem cells, they have to be removed from human embryos, destroying the embryos in the process. The National Institutes of Health said stem cell research holds "enormous promise" and "has the potential to revolutionize the practice of medicine and improve the quality and length of life." Strict rules and regulations have had to be put into place to regulate this new area of scientific research.

Conservatives are pro-life, so they argue that using the cells is the equivalent of taking a life, even if it is to save life. Conservatives say that the destruction of human embryos is ethically unacceptable. Conservatives are in support of completely banning the practice all together.

Liberals argue that stem cell research say it holds unrivaled promise of new medical treatments. Liberals remind us that scientists grow stem cells from leftover fertilized eggs, or embryos that are produced at fertility clinics which would not be used for implantation. Liberals are in support of loosening the restrictions and regulations on embryonic stem cell research. The research it self can make ground breaking contributions to the scientific field, primarily in medicine. Liberals are quick to point out all of the benefits of the research, but do acknowledge the ethical dilemma involved.

I am conservative on this issue. It is not right to create life just to destroy it. But I also realize that by sacrificing embryos we may potentially find cure to diseases, and save an unlimited number of lives for years to come. Despite all of the potential benefits that stem cell research may offer, I do not believe that research should come at the expense of would-be offspring.