Find » Education » The Rising Number of Parents Who Ed...

The Rising Number of Parents Who Educate Their Children at Home May Be Harming as Much as Helping

By Joseph Wilson, published May 30, 2005
Published Content: 2  Total Views: 1,198  Favorited By: 0 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.1 of 5
Principled argument seldom if ever coexists with monetary concerns; the most easily acquired skill in the world is to turn preference into principle; statistics are the third and most damning variety of lie. At the intersection of these truisms lies the national debate over home schooling. According to the Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) in Washington, about one percent of school-age children nationally are home-schooled, a total of nearly 500,000. The number is probably much greater, as states differ in the reporting requirements for home schooling parents, and some children are home schooled for only a few years. Unofficial estimates suggest as many as two million students are now educated at home, and two million students lost to the public school system represents a considerable threat to the education industry. Therein lies the now familiar ground of contention.Proponents of home schooling rehearse familiar and, when left unexamined, impressive points. A 1999 survey revealed that home-schooled students outperformed their peers in both public and Catholic/private schools. In the early grades, home-schooled students typically outperformed their peers by one full grade. The median test scores for every test at every grade level fell between the 70th and 80th percentiles. Home-schooled students averaged in the 65th percentile on the ACT, and scored 67 points above the average SAT. These results confirmed a 1994 study that indicated that home-school students consistently scored better in standardized tests than their public school peers. The 1999 study was the first to suggest that home-schooled students might be superior to Catholic/private school students as well. Moreover, home-schooling has been on the increase in other countries, including Canada, the UK, and Belgium. Preliminary data from studies of home-schooled students in these countries indicates similar positive outcomes.The good news does not stop there. Home-schooled students fare well in college: a 1997 study done by Georgia Southern College reported that in every significant way, emotionally, socially, and academically, home-schooled students were as or more prepared for college then graduates of the public school system. A 1996 survey offered anecdotal evidence from admission officers from a wide range of state and private institutions; the praise of home-schooled students at the respective institutions was conspicuous. A 1997 study tracking the college achievements of home-school, privately school, and public school graduates demonstrated the superior performance of the home-school students. Out of 63 total indicators, home-schooled students proved superior in 42. A Wall Street Journal survey indicated that home-schooled students enjoyed higher-than-average grades at two selected universities.The Roman historian Tacitus wrote of the brutal year 69, when 4 emperors claimed the throne and civil strife threatened to overwhelm the state, that the secret of the Roman Empire had been revealed: an emperor could be made outside of Rome. The results of the surveys might suggest a paraphrase: a great student can be made outside of the school system.Caveats abound, however. Home-schooled students may outperform their peers at every level, but on the standardized college entry exams, the difference is not overwhelming. Home-schooled students usually begin with several advantages: nearly one-quarter of all home-schooled students have one parent who holds teacher certification; home-schooled student come overwhelmingly (98%) from two-parent families, and over three-quarters have mothers who do not work outside the home; home-schooled students watch far less television than traditionally schooled students. In short, home-schooled students enjoy the enormous advantages of traditional families, generally consistent and sometimes formidable discipline, and parents who a priori demonstrate great interest in their children’s education.A more valid study on the success of home-schooled students needs to be undertaken, one in which the academic performance of home-schooled students are compared to public and private school students who enjoy similar advantages, before home schooling can be proclaimed an unequivocal success. Thus far, no such study exists.Reasons for Home SchoolingA 1999 NCES survey discovered a wide range of reasons that parents chose home-schooling: the often dangerous environment in public and, increasingly, private schools; rampant drug problems in the schools; serious concerns about sexual education and sexual morality; and a belief that schools may be unable to deal with the special needs of particular children. However, the two main reasons for home schooling were the belief that the parents could do a better job of educating the child, and the religious beliefs of the parents. Indeed, evidence suggests that conservative Christians are by far the largest single group of home-schoolers.Interviews with and analyses of local home-schooling parents revealed the same concerns and motivations. Most identified themselves as conservative Catholics or Christians; one or both parents had teaching degrees or strong educational backgrounds; all expressed little confidence in the public school system, and one couple home schooled despite the fact that the husband was himself a private school principal.Concerns:Although the 1999 NCES survey indicated that about 20 percent of public school systems offer some level of support to home-schooling parents, the practice of home schooling is controversial. The national Parent-Teacher’s Association opposes home schooling, as does the Association of Elementary School Principals. The National Education Association has proposed strict guidelines for home schooling and is on record as opposing any program that diverts resources from the public schools. A 1999 pronouncement from the NEA also claimed that home-schooling failed to provide students a comprehensive educational experience.The rising number of home-schooled students and, perhaps more importantly, home-schooling parents active in politics and holding local and state office are problematic for the NEA and other public school supporters. The dissatisfaction evidenced by such parents with the public schools represents a growing threat to school funding. Parents of home schooled students estimate that they spend 2000 dollars per year for books and other resources, yet receive no tax relief. Given that a large number of home-schooling parents identify themselves as Christian and conservative, pressure is likely to mount on Republicans from one of their principal constituencies to offer just such a remedy. As public school supporters resist any diminution of tax support, a serious battle over the issue looms, one that may shape the educational platforms of both parties at this year’s national conventions.Real costs:No serious evidence exists to indicate that home-schooled students lose anything by not socializing with their public and private school peers. But that is not the entire story. In Analects 9.4, we learn that Confucius wished to settle among the Nine Barbarian Tribes of the East. His students, alarmed at the Master’s decision, asked how he could endure the uncouthness of the barbarians. His answer cuts to a real and often overlooked aspect of the debate over home schooling. He said, “when a gentleman has settled among them, what uncouthness can there be?” Home schooling thus far has not cost the public schools a dime. What it has cost may be far more valuable than money. The vast majority of home-schooled students come from two-parent households in which discipline is strongly encouraged, television watching discouraged, one parent stays at home, one or both parents has educational credentials and an abiding commitment to education, and church attendance is regular. The overriding assumption of home-schooling parents is that the vices of the public schools will negatively impact their children. The opposite may be true; those students may impart the positive virtues learned at home to the public sphere. In essence, good people do so in every interaction, every day, at all times. Civility and decency rely on a “critical mass” of people committed to the very virtues extolled by home-schooling parents; by depriving public and even private schools of their children, such parents may ultimately harm the public interest.

Takeaways
  • Home-schooling prepares students well for colleges.
  • The students who are home schooled, however, may have expected success anyway in school.
  • The national interest may not be well served by home-schooling
Did You Know?
That nearly 2 million children are now home-schooled for at least part of their student careers?
Resources
Comments
Comments 1 - 9 of 9
 
 
on to post-secondary education. Here's the clincher. This is MY family. I am the oldest girl, the one who is a registered nurse. I have had people tell me I should have gone to medical school and I'm sure that I would have easily been accepted. Is it fair to say that my siblings and I are second-class citizens because we are homeschooled? My three oldest brothers are violinists (one switched to viola) and have received awards for their performance and, in the case of the older two, for their compositions. I would expect that the nature of our accomplishments suggests that we are just as successful as children who attended public school.

Posted on 11/19/2007 at 12:11:00 PM

 
homeschooling was the best choice for their family. They began homeschooling that very fall, and a sixth child was born four months later. All of the children were put into Internet school at some point during junior high. The oldest girl graduated valedictorian, went on to earn a Bachelor of Nursing with distinction, is currently employed as a registered nurse, and plans to go on to a master's program next fall. During nursing school and in her work, her colleagues would often look to her to assist them with questions because of her intelligence and memory. The younger girl graduated, earned a certificate in Early Childhood Education, and is currently employed as a daycare worker. She has a serious boyfriend and is very well adjusted socially. The oldest boy graduated valedictorian as well, and is currently working towards a Bachelor of Music. He is planning to go on to a master's program, possibly at Yale. The three younger boys are still in Internet school, and plan to go o

Posted on 11/19/2007 at 12:11:00 PM

 
I agree with you that there are parents who homeschool their children simply to hide them from the world. I personally know parents who feel this way. Having said that, there are also parents who homeschool because they are dissatisfied with the public system and don't feel it meets their children's needs. Take, for instance, a family I know. They had 5 children. The oldest was in Grade 3, one was in Grade 1, and a third was about to start kindergarten. The school principal and ECS teacher wanted to skip the third child directly into Grade 1; however, the school board refused to allow it. The parents were quite unhappy, and also knew that their girls had struggled in school. The oldest was very intelligent and was bringing home work that was really too easy for her, while the younger girl was very sensitive and became upset when her teacher disciplined special-needs children in class. These parents discussed matters, prayed extensively (they were Catholic), and determined that

Posted on 11/19/2007 at 12:11:00 PM

 
Over the last few decades, the critics said homeschoolers wouldn't compete academically, couldn't get into college, and would be socially retarded...yet that data proves that all wrong. Is the only argument left that we are taking the good kids out of a failing system? I refuse to see how martyring my child will change anything. Quality adults in the real world can sometimes uplift. However, quality children in the unnatural "Lord of the Flies" atmosphere of today's schools should not be expected to perform the miracle of making badly- parented children want to be good. I find it funny that those making all the sacrifices in order to be exceptional parents (income, time and money) are being portrayed as selfish. Let's redirect that label to those whom it belongs...the ones who have forgotten that parent is a verb and aren't providing those critical elements to ensure their own children are good.

Posted on 01/05/2007 at 1:01:00 AM

 
As a parent new to homeschooling, I have been doing a lot of reading on this subject. Mr. Wilson summarizes the current data very well, but his take on it seems absurd, almost like a parody of the issue. Homeschoolers are not responsible for the failures of the public school system. If anything, their existence and success simply point to that failure. Also, I feel that it is unfair to characterize HS parent educators as religious conservatives. An increasing number of parents do not lean that way, and I for one would not expect a tax break for opting out of public education.

Posted on 09/22/2006 at 11:09:00 PM

 
Interesting article. The only point I disagre with is that you suggest homeschool parents should keep thier kids in school for the good of the system...to keep it going. But would you keep your hand in the fire to keep it burning? Not I. You can read one of the many articles I have written on AC on homeschooling.

Posted on 06/19/2006 at 2:06:00 AM

 
Mr. Wilson has done a thoughtful, thorough and even handed job of presenting the issues around home schooling. Home schoolers are the beginning of the end for a bankrupt system that taxpayers are forced to support. Look for my upcoming article on AC.

Posted on 08/12/2005 at 1:08:00 PM

 
School districts have been heard accusing homeschoolers of robbing funds. The majority of education professionals are liberal and most likely pro-choice. Why don't they decry the loss of funds that millions of aborted children might have provided schools?

Posted on 07/27/2005 at 11:07:00 AM

 
It's the parent's responsibility to ensure his/her child's safety as well as provide a quality education. Today's public schools, for the most part, can guarantee neither. There is no reason to leave a child in an unsafe environment in order to "help" the other students. That is not a child's job. Although some public schools are safe, and many provide decent educations, I chose to pull my children out three years ago and have never looked back. No drugs, no teasing, no fighting, no bullying, no immoral behavior...what's to choose?

Posted on 06/07/2005 at 7:06:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 9 of 9
 
Advertisment