Review of the Apple TV as a Cable/Satellite Replacement

Does Apple's Slim Silver Box Have What it Takes to Compete?

So, at the beginning of July I was sitting in front of my computer purchasing some television program or another off of iTunes. I don't remember which program exactly but one I wasn't watching via my Satellite service because it either isn't on anymore or
 I simply was unaware which channel it was on. As I was sitting there I thought to myself: "gee this buying TV shows on iTunes deal is pretty cool, but I'd much rather watch these shows on my pretty Plasma Screen TV. It's too bad there isn't a simple way to do that." Because, yes I could do it by transferring the files to a laptop and plugging the laptop into the TV, but that's a bit more work than I want to do on a regular basis just to watch some TV. Then, I realized that I had heard of a device that could do exactly what I was thinking, stream content from iTunes to my televsion, The Apple TV.

So, I dug out my Satellite bill and started running some numbers. The plan my girlfriend and I have for Satellite TV costs just over $600 a year. The 40GB Apple TV costs about $300. After that you only pay for what you would want to watch. I ran the numbers on the shows I know we watch (like Heroes or The Shield or Mythbusters) that are available on iTunes. According to my calculations, based on what we watch the programming would run us about $300 to $400 a year. So, according to my numbers the first year of owning the device would probably be more expensive than Satellite, but subsequent years will be significantly less expensive. I think this is particularly true as I tend to watch a lot of reruns of Adult Swim programs and instead of paying a monthly fee that would allow me to watch them each month, I will have purchased the season once and can watch it again and again whenever I like.

After I figured out the financial viability I talked to a few of the more technically inclined people I know. Smart folks who have their fingers on the pulse and actually understand how the devices work and know all the fancy words. They all thought that it would be a good idea especially if it turned out to be financially a better option.

Related information
 
Comments 1 - 3 of 3  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Uncle Sean, just wanted to let you know that I finally got the HD podcast list updated. You can check it out at http://hd.appletvsource.com .

Posted on 08/24/2007 at 12:08:00 AM

That's true. I guess I wasn't really thinking about those as iTunes Store content. I actually have subscribed to a number of the HD podcasts. GeekBrief.tv, Beautiful Places in HD, and the Washington Post's daily HD video podcast. They're nice, but I think that Apple as the developers of the product should really be taking on offering HD content instead of it just being up to individual users and groups who put out podcasts to take that on. I admit my using the Apple TV as a replacement probably puts me in a slightly different boat than most Apple TV users, but I still think that offering shows and movies in High Definition will be the best way to service customers and will give the Apple TV a helpful kick in the pants as far as being a solid potential replacement for current services. Just my thought on it anyway.

Posted on 08/17/2007 at 2:08:00 PM

Uncle Sean, thank you for your article. Glad to know that you like the Apple TV like we do. You complained that there is not HD content available on the iTunes Store yet. Though this is true, a growing number of podcasts are now available in HD format. You can find a compilation of HD podcasts on our site, http://appletvsource.com . The site is currently being worked on to allow better searching and browsing. It should be done sometimes next week.

Posted on 08/15/2007 at 12:08:00 PM

Comments 1 - 3 of 3