Find » Opinion/Editorial » Opinions Are like . . .

Opinions Are like . . .

Or, How to Make People Dislike You

By BlowHard, published Aug 11, 2007
Published Content: 194  Total Views: 30,765  Favorited By: 53 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.9 of 5
I have learned many things in my years on this planet and I continue to learn all the time. Not only do I become aware of new things, but often re-learn something I'd forgotten. I develop a new awareness with regard to topics with which I was familiar but had not kept top of mind. And as often as I learn about others, I learn about myself.

The most recent lesson I re-learned came about as I noticed how the last four articles I've written have not been too well received. I noticed they were all rated well below the starting point of 3 stars. And what's worse, there were almost no comments on many of my writings. My conclusion is that not only do the readers not like my opinions, style, presentation, etc., but they do not even consider me worthy of their comments.

Now I'm a lot of things, but I'm not self-deluded. I am aware that perhaps the poor ratings on my recent articles are because some readers are familiar with me and don't like my opinions, or do not like me personally because of my opinions. Some dislike my writing style; some dislike my conclusions; some dislike my platform. And because I'm not overly PC, or more accurately not at all PC, and since I'll call 'em like I see 'em, I am aware of the criticisms leveled at me. I have been told I'm "mean spirited, name calling, angry (I love that one). . . ." so the dissent to my writings is not at all surprising and in fact to be expected.

Where I was confused was the part about almost no commentary on my writings. I would expect that those who disagree with me would pipe up with their issues, and some do. But as I recently observed with my last four previous posts, I have been deemed worthy of down-grading but not worthy of comment. That got me to thinking - remember my original thesis - I re-learn as "old" knowledge as often as I acquire new enlightenment?

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 16
Next >>
 
Thanks much, although I'm amazed Alyce would spread good buzz about me, as she and I had a little disagreement, but nonetheless I do appreciate anyone who bothers to read my articles, even if they don't have the good sense to agree with me. LOL

Posted on 08/30/2007 at 8:08:00 PM

 
Thanks for the constructive criticism and kind words, Dreah.

Posted on 08/13/2007 at 6:08:00 PM

 
I read page one of your article, and skimmed the comments... It's your deliveryn (if you didn't already know that). Your writing grammar skills are excellent..

Posted on 08/13/2007 at 2:08:00 PM

 
Ah...Granny, I'm in your age group, so we're contemporaries, and u ain't my Granny - unless yur 91 years old and I call you Nana. Is that you Nana? And if it is you Nana, you should have known better than pick a fight with me. My reference to writing u under the table was my accepting yur challenge. Don't challenge me and then say u don't care if I take yur challenge. Gettin' forgetful are we, Nana? And misogynist??? How does my calling someone a "brainwashed feminist" equate to a hatred of women, and it damn sure ain't as bad as referring to "Republicans & Christians" as "Hitler[s]" now is it? Well, is it?

Posted on 08/13/2007 at 11:08:00 AM

 
"Brainwashed feminist"? Sounds miscogynist to me, das all. I do not care if you can write "my butt under the table". Perhaps your parents taught you to speak to grandmothers that way, but I was taught differently. Peace.

Posted on 08/12/2007 at 11:08:00 PM

 
"I would love, Jim, to see you write an article explaining why females should have to ask males for permission to do anything." What are you talking about here Alyce??? Is this a reference to the CP article about the proposed Ohio law? GO BACK AND READ MY RESPONSES TO THE ARTICLE!! Are you brain dead? I merely said that the man should have input in the decision. I NEVER advocated over turning Roe, nor did I argue a woman should not have access to legal abortion. Stop attributing to me things I did not say. And, I'll write yur butt under the table, ANYTIME, ANYWHERE. Your turn!

Posted on 08/12/2007 at 2:08:00 PM

 
Dee, I WAS NOT COMPLAINING because I get down rated. Is that clear enuff??? I was lamenting the LACK OF COMMENT that comes with the down rating. That's all. I was publicly taking myself to task for the errors I made in my writings or commentary that may have caused others to not reply to my writings, ESPECIALLY if they feel I treat them unfairly or unkindly. I was offering that perhaps I need to improve my presentation because I do not want peeps to not feel comfortable commenting on my articles.

Posted on 08/12/2007 at 2:08:00 PM

 
AC took out my html to show the word "was" in italics in the sentence about the lack of comments. And I forgot to say, I was passing on some to this newbie the names of some CP's he might enjoy reading and sharing page views with.

Posted on 08/11/2007 at 9:08:00 PM

 
Truthfully, I read this article, because a newbie was lamenting about not getting noticed and I was looking for a few people that I thought would read his articles and leave a comment, if he read yours and left a comment first. If you did not approve of my comments then you understand how we feel when we read yours. Peace and apologizes.

Posted on 08/11/2007 at 9:08:00 PM

 
I said that perhaps the "low rating" was the comment. What lib friends? I am well balanced middle of the road person. My ususal comments are "That was great" "Thank you for sharing" or adding a bit of personal trivia. When people start bashing "your lib friends" "you're a brain washed feminist" I do tend to like to have a bit of harmless fun, poking fun at the basher. I would love, Jim, to see you write an article explaining why females should have to ask males for permission to do anything.

Posted on 08/11/2007 at 9:08:00 PM

 
Lastly Alyce, in your criticisms of me you seem to hold me to a standard that you do not hold your Lib buddies to. Why? They can get hateful as Hell with those that disagree with them, but you don't seem to object when your Lib pals do it. Doesn't that seems hypocritical to you? I think most would say yes it does. And your last statement "Who wants to read a warrior when they are pacifists?" I guess that says it all, don't it? Just remember but for us warriors your pacifist ass would be DEAD! You're a real brain trust, ain't ya? Ooooppps! That wasn't very nice of me!

Posted on 08/11/2007 at 8:08:00 PM

 
You further offered that I "have not matured beyond an elementary school level, do not know how to disagree without being disagreeable, and love bashing people who do not believe as you believe." Hmmm. I find this interesting in that I posted a sort of mea culpa, and you then try to slap me when I'm down. I admit I have to do better and you kick me. Thanks for your inclusiveness, kindness, understanding and general concern for my welfare. And especially thanks for extending constructive criticism...whoops, that's not what you did. Silly me! You'd think I'd be savvy enuff to know when someone is trying to demean me.

Posted on 08/11/2007 at 8:08:00 PM

 
Alyce:" Perhaps they are commenting with rating your articles as low." Agreed. I stated that in my article, did I not? I was merely curious as to why no comment beyond the rating. But, isn't it you calling the kettle black? You said "...Republican and Christian Hitler." So, that begs the question WTF???????????? You tell me I'm antagonizing readers, then YOU make such a horrid comment. Does that statement on your part not seem to negate your whole argument? Or is it OK for "pacifists" to do all the name calling? Just asking... As to your 2nd post see my next comment.

Posted on 08/11/2007 at 8:08:00 PM

 
...that you have not matured beyond an elementary school level, do not know how to disagree without being disagreeable, and love bashing people who do not believe as you believe. That might answer your questions. Make love, or make war. Who wants to read a warrior when they are pacifists?

Posted on 08/11/2007 at 4:08:00 PM

 
Perhaps they are commenting with rating your articles as low. Personally, if I disagree with a point of view, but the article is well writen, I would not bother rating it. I rated one a few articles as a 1 star: one because the article was one sentence long. Another because it was an enlargement of a profile picture. As for me, I will fight too, the Conservative group think, the Republican and Christian Hitler like end to democracy and "god" given rights to freedom. Everyone has opinions and the rights to express them, but "you can not expect to influence people if you antagonize them". My opinion is...

Posted on 08/11/2007 at 4:08:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 16
Next >>
Most Commented On