Dick Cheney Admits that Toppling Saddam Hussein Would Result in a Quagmire in Iraq

The following is not made up, not fictional, not edited, and did not happen in my imagination. It is the transcript from an actual conversation with the man who is currently Vice President, Dick Cheney. (Fact: Dick Cheney is the only sitting Vice President to ever shoot in a man in the face and not personally report it to the police.)
The interview was conducted in 1994 and was in response to the first Gulf War.

Q: Do you think the U.S., or U.N. forces, should have moved into Baghdad?

Dick Cheney: No..

Q: Why not?

Dick Cheney: Because if we'd gone to Baghdad we would have been all alone. There wouldn't have been anybody else with us. There would have been a U.S. occupation of Iraq. None of the Arab forces that were willing to fight with us in Kuwait were willing to invade Iraq.

Once you got to Iraq and took it over, took down Saddam Hussein's government, then what are you going to put in its place? That's a very volatile part of the world, and if you take down the central government of Iraq, you could very easily end up seeing pieces of Iraq fly off: part of it, the Syrians would like to have to the west, part of it -- eastern Iraq -- the Iranians would like to claim, they fought over it for eight years. In the north you've got the Kurds, and if the Kurds spin loose and join with the Kurds in Turkey, then you threaten the territorial integrity of Turkey.

It's a quagmire if you go that far and try to take over Iraq.

The other thing was casualties. Everyone was impressed with the fact we were able to do our job with as few casualties as we had. But for the 146 Americans killed in action, and for their families -- it wasn't a cheap war. And the question for the president, in terms of whether or not we went on to Baghdad, took additional casualties in an effort to get Saddam Hussein, was how many additional dead Americans is Saddam worth? Our judgment was, not very many, and I think we got it right.