Find » Opinion/Editorial » Abortion Clinic Bombers: The Misapp...

Abortion Clinic Bombers: The Misapplied Christian Link to Terror

By Chadd De Las Casas, published Aug 30, 2007
Published Content: 263  Total Views: 148,942  Favorited By: 28 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.8 of 5
The ruins of the World Trade Centers hadn't even finished crumbling and smoldering before I heard colleagues at school telling me, "Well, Christian abortion bombers aren't any better." Personally, I wasn't interested in moral equivalency at the time, the Christian abortion clinic bombers were criminals too, but my mind was on the here and now, and unless the World Trade Centers were the centers of a grand abortion scheme that no one knows about, I seriously doubted it was Christian extremists that carried out the attacks.

Ever since then, whenever someone brings up a terrorist attack carried out by Islamic fundamentalists, you are expected to practice the Fairness Doctrine and give appropriate lip service to the "Christian" attacks on abortion clinics in order to demonstrate that neither side is beyond reproach. Of course, there is something to be said about the fact that when "Christians" attack, they are not supported by a body of religious figures that can be recognized as a legitimate authority, are wholly condemned by the Christian community both far and wide, and are doing so not for religious reasons but because in their minds these abortion clinics are clinics of death where babies are daily being killed and thus their existence means the continued death of another child. Somehow it's hard to generate the same feelings against someone who wants to preserve life as it is to generate against someone who uses planes as torpedoes. But I digress.

Perhaps the most telling thing about how absurd this argument is are the simple numbers. A simple glance indicates that, across America, there have only been 168 attacks against abortion clinics since 1982, the Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) Bureau reports. These attacks come with surprisingly little casualties, and most attacks are rather measured in property damage, rather than human lives lost. Therefore to run it on average, every year there will be six or seven abortion related attacks across America, with a marginal increase in these numbers in Canada and Australia (one in Australia's history, for example).

Takeaways
  • There are roughly 1550 Islamic Terrorist attacks per year.
  • There are roughly 6 Abortion Related Attacks per year.
  • Christian Extremists are considered as dangerous as Islamic Extremists by many people.
Comments
Comments 1 - 15 of 64
Next >>
 
You may think that Deez - but they don't. Muslim moderates absolutely do not denounce the 9000+ terror attacks since 9/11 with the same veracity.

Posted on 11/01/2007 at 11:11:00 AM

 
One equating factor is the legality issue (getting their way through law). Neither the Christian terrorists nor the Islamic terrorists can get their way through legal means (legislation in the U.S. against abortion or in the case of Islamic militants, the International Communities Law). I think that both the Muslims and Christian moderates denounce these illegal and immoral acts with the same veracity. Good article otherwise.

Posted on 11/01/2007 at 5:11:00 AM

 
I will do so until someone can present actual evidence as to why I should believe otherwise.

Posted on 10/14/2007 at 8:10:00 PM

 
Whatever, believe what you want to believe.

Posted on 10/14/2007 at 6:10:00 PM

 
No, people have a right to isolate themselves and hide themselves away from public. They have a right to be weird cultists, they have a right to do bizarre things you don't agree with. And if they commit a crime? They have a right to see a search warrant before any officers try to enter their homes. It doesn't matter if a search warrant was in their possession - they failed to show it to the Davidians. Were they acrobatic police officers? Did they expect to show it to them from the second story window? Is this some Waco custom I've never heard of? Furthermore, what could more likely cause the fire - a group of people trying to fight off the police, or the armored car that drove into the house and likely struck a gas line? Nope, it doesn't matter WHAT you BELIEVE they're doing - you uphold the law, or you're wrong.

Posted on 10/13/2007 at 9:10:00 PM

 
Well excuse me, but I was under the impression that they did indeed carry a search warrant (http://www.jaedworks.com/shoebox/waco.html) and were fired upon. I firmly believe though that the whole disaster cannot be blamed on one party. In my opinion, the warrant contains many flaws and violations of search and seizure law from the early 90's. The Davidians however did not willingly comply with any requests from law enforcement; I would think that everyone can agree that if you shut yourself in a compound and not comply with police, they're going to assume you're up to no good, and they'll try and get you out. More so if they have reason to believe you have guns, explosives, and possibly endangering children in the process. I agree that the situation could definitely have been better handled, but then again, there is strong evidence that the Davidians commited suicides and lit the fire of their own demise.

Posted on 10/13/2007 at 8:10:00 PM

 
There was no idea of a hostage situation - one day, ATF commandos stormed his house without presenting a warrant, and were fought out, which is, by the way, their right to do. When government officials storm your house without proper authority, you have every right to force them back out.

Posted on 10/13/2007 at 4:10:00 PM

 
No, but resist arrest and create the appearance of a hostage situation and force will be used. That's what the whole of law enforcement in America is built on.

Posted on 10/13/2007 at 4:10:00 PM

 
So call someone a "cultist" and you can bulldoze their home and torch them and scores of their followers?

Posted on 10/12/2007 at 7:10:00 PM

 
I know full well who you were talking about - and I know plenty about him. Like that he has Constitutional rights to not have his house invaded by the ATF. It's amusing of course that Koresh, because he was accused of child molestation, is denied Constitutional rights while we grant them to Guantanamo Bay detainees. Astounding.

Posted on 10/11/2007 at 9:10:00 PM

 
What's astounding is that you don't know anything about David Koresh, the man I was talking about, and who's raid you called unconstitutional.

Posted on 10/11/2007 at 1:10:00 PM

 
Hm, so now foreign militants held off of American soil have Constitutional Rights and American citizens with no convictions of child molestation don't? That's news to me. Further, your speculating sensationalism isn't going to work - "Well he was executed a Catholic" is about the weakest form of evidence I've ever heard. Further, of course Catholics and Christians wouldn't call it a Christian act: THEY CONDEMNED IT. The same cannot be said of, well, the majority of religious figures in the Middle East. Astounding that.

Posted on 10/10/2007 at 1:10:00 PM

 
I disagree with isolationism, I tend to think that the world is a LOT better off with a "good guy" who steps up and confronts bad guys. When I look at what the US has gone into, outside of perhaps WW1, it's done for good cause, and it's been done by being on the right side of the issue. I don't find human sufferring and massive deaths to be acceptable at the hands of others in Darfur, in Iraq, in Cambodia, in the old Soviet Union, in Cuba, while the completely impotent UN who's function seems to be to heap scorn on successful nations does nothing b ut profiteer from it, like that vile, evil, disgusting excuse for a human being Kofi Annan did when he enriched himself with Iraqi blood.

Posted on 10/08/2007 at 11:10:00 PM

 
About my last point: namely America seems to always stick it's head where it shouldn't be. We often just need to let other countries settle their affairs without getting involved. I think if we would have done that in this situation we're in, we wouldn't have so many of our soldiers dead, and we wouldn't be so disliked by so many countries in the Middle East.

Posted on 10/08/2007 at 6:10:00 PM

 
So first of all you think the raid against the leader of a cult who engaged in child molestation, statutory rape, and who believed he was commanded by God, was unconstitutional. Second, even though Timothy McVeigh described himself as agnostic in a letter, he was once a devout Catholic along with his father, and his execution included a Roman Catholic ceremony. So I think that leaves his religious motivations a bit unclear, and therefore doesn't mean one way or another if the Oklahoma bombing was an act of Christian terrorism. But if it was, and every Catholic church on the Earth knew it was, do you really think any of them would step forward and say, yes that was one of ours and we support it? I don't think so. Lastly, even if we aren't to blame for Iraq, which I seriously doubt, do you think we're completely free of responsibility regarding other major conflicts? Vietnam anyone?

Posted on 10/08/2007 at 6:10:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 15 of 64
Next >>
Advertisment