Darwinism Will Never Die

By Q & A, published Sep 07, 2007
Published Content: 29  Total Views: 10,955  Favorited By: 3 CPs
Rating: 3.2 of 5
Phil Dobson, an Associated Content Producer, writes in a five page article, The Death of Darwinism, about how Scientists supposedly are claiming that Evolution does not fit the evidence. He states that he will enjoy watching the theory of evolution's slow and painful demise. I laughed my bum off when I read that last line.

This is what I have to say to him, and all the other like minded foes out there:

I suppose you think that creationism is the "correct" one because it just simply has an over abundance of "correct" evidence, ay'? Right. Those transitional fossils have not been found because of one of three reasons:

One, we just simply have not found them yet.

Two, they are under the ocean, because whether you believe the tectonic plates shift and rotate over the years or not, billions of years, they do shift. That is fact. Oh, and by the way, I said billions of years, not a mere thousand like the "Bible" clearly claims to be the truth. And because we have these proven shifts in the plates, we have a shift as to where land and water is over the billions of years.

So, our fossils that you claim we have not found, and you imply will never be found, might very well be in the ocean. Another note, we have only explored only a mere 5% of the ocean, the oceans surface. We have hardly dug anything out of the ocean, besides some long lost treasure chests and a ship called Titanic. The ocean covers over 70% of the world. You use common sense on that one.

And three, because the tectonic plates shift, they are folding in on themselves. This means that the plates are being recycled back into the core of the Earth back into the burning melting lava core that exists beneath us as we speak. There is a chance that the fossils from billions and billions of years ago could have been recycled into the Earth already. Take your pick on those three.

Darwinism Will Never Die

I love to talk about Evolution, but when it gets right down to it, I laugh my bum off, even at the Scientists.

Credit: http://bioephemera.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/phpThumb.jpeg

Copyright: http://bioephemera.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/phpThumb.jpeg

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
I meant L. Ron Hubbard. Sorry.

Posted on 03/13/2008 at 10:03:38 AM

 
Great article and I do believe in the destruction of Earth for the Pan Galactic Highway. If Ron L. Hubbard can create a religion, then so can Douglas Adams. LOL.

Posted on 03/13/2008 at 10:03:34 AM

 
Actually, the Earth is soon going to be destroyed to make way for a Pan Galactic Highway passage. Besides, everyone knows that the Earth is REALLY a giant supercomputer built to calculate the meaning of life, the universe, and everything; and of course the answer to that burning question is 42...HAHAHAHAHA, a wonderful article, Me...or, um, should I address you as You? Otherwise, I'm talking to myself...or so it seems...At any rate, there is a serious (and scientific) argument against the specifically Darwinian paradigm OF evolution, but needless to say it ain't no silly creationism. Gud Lawd: global warming, creationism, the Invisible Man Who's Omniscient but always needs more money...no wonder fools die laughing; they're all comedians.

Posted on 09/08/2007 at 10:09:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Most Commented On