Catholic Bishops Appalled by Amnesty International's New Stance on Abortion

By Brant McLaughlin, published Aug 24, 2007
Published Content: 794  Total Views: 203,215  Favorited By: 28 CPs
Rating: 3.0 of 5
The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has expressed outrage at the decision of Amnesty International to support women's rights to have abortions. The decision represents a change in what has been a long-standing position of the organization's which was antagonistic toward abortion.

The Conference has called it an affront to "people in many nations, cultures and religions who share a consistent commitment to all human rights."

"Amnesty International's action will lead many people of conscience to seek alternative means to end grave human rights abuses, fight injustice, and promote freedom of conscience and expression. The essential work of protecting human life and promoting human dignity must carry on...To some, the action of Amnesty International may appear to be a compassionate response to women in difficult situations of pregnancy, but this is a false compassion...As our Conference has argued, a far more compassionate response is to provide support and services for pregnant women, advance their educational and economic standing in society, and resist all forms of violence and stigmatization against women," writes William S. Skylstad, president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.

Critics of this militant stance against abortion assert that it is the extension of the looming shadow of patriarchal attitudes that formerly led the Catholic Church to degrade women for centuries, because it does not take into consideration the sacred right of a woman to decide what to do with her own body and her own future.

Although the Church would be justified in asserting that abortion is not an acceptable form of birth control, it fails to consider the agonizing choice that would face a pregnant woman, and probably the father of her unborn child, if she learned that carrying through with her pregnancy would threaten her life, or if medical scans showed that her baby would be severely deformed or diseased in some way, the critics continue.

Catholic Bishops Appalled by Amnesty International's New Stance on Abortion
Date: August 24, 2007
Location:
Washington, DC  USA
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 11 of 11
 
 
This constant dribble of bishops leaving Amnesty is a cynical ploy by the catholic church to try and hurt Amnesty financially and thus cause a rethink. It has made me decide to join Amnesty for the first time, and I urge you to do the same. www.PetitionOnline.com/ainotcc/petition.html

Posted on 08/29/2007 at 12:08:00 PM

 
Always remember, dear reader: Sacred cows make the best hamburgers.

Posted on 08/27/2007 at 9:08:00 AM

 
Hi Christopher - interesting commentary. Thank you.

Posted on 08/27/2007 at 7:08:00 AM

 
Lauren, your commentary is worthy of being erased and you are worthy of being blocked. However, I am going to leave your comments here for future readers to see how ignorant, prejudiced, and fearful (not to mention illogical and irrational) fundementalist religious beliefs cause people to be.

Posted on 08/27/2007 at 7:08:00 AM

 
Hi Carol. Yes, religion and writings about it do strongly tend to set off enormous mood swings. Hahahaha.

Posted on 08/27/2007 at 7:08:00 AM

 
Lauren, You have projected your "shallow arrogance" onto the author of this piece, who is myself. And while it is true that I am indeed "pro choice", I gave a perfectly objective assessment of the situation. I very much doubt you have much understanding of Church history and theology compared to me. Catholic women have very often felt degraded by Chruch teachings, and if you don't know that then you live in a cave.

Posted on 08/27/2007 at 7:08:00 AM

 
Wow, Brant, you have really triggered some intense feelings in some readers.

Posted on 08/25/2007 at 5:08:00 PM

 
The Catholic Church is a terrorist organization. They have exasperated the HIV problem in Africa enormously by preaching that condom use is sinful, and now they are trying to convince African women that a fetus is more important than the women themselves are. If the Catholic Church were anything other than a religious organization, it would have been condemned globally for the incredible amount of blood it has on its hands.

Posted on 08/25/2007 at 2:08:00 AM

 
(continued) ... college graduate who double majored in history and business finance. I am also a mother, a wife, and a Christian. And I reject any implication that I am a "political activist." Much of this article and the claims of this author are unproved, un-provable, and I feel that anyone not wishing to remain ignorant and hateful towards women (and Catholic women in particular) should dismiss them as "rubbish" (preferably after they make the effort to determine for themselves that "rubbish" is - in fact - the best word to use.) Thank you and may God bless you and your families! Lauren

Posted on 08/24/2007 at 10:08:00 PM

 
(continued) ...[just]ified in 'asserting?' The author clearly does not understand the basics (and they are pretty basic) of how the authority of the Catholic Church works - much less what the word "justified" means. Not to mention 'asserting' that the Church (which includes me) has failed to consider the suffering of pregnant women in different circumstances around the world. I 'assert' that the author "fails to consider" that the majority of women who have had abortions endure an incredible amount of suffering. And the resources to help suffering women are very difficult to find... partially because of articles like this that mock and belittle our pain with vague references to "professional psychiatrists." I highly doubt the author has taken the time to research the reality of the suffering caused by abortion, after all, the author is part of the "media blitz" who actively "degrade women" by attempting to keep us silent about our pain and neglect. I am a 24 year old coll

Posted on 08/24/2007 at 10:08:00 PM

 
I think it is pretty clear that the author of this article is pro-choice - the spin in that direction is pretty far from subtle. As a woman who has a decent understanding of her religion (what it teaches and why) - and who is also faithful to the Catholic Church - I find the author's rhetoric to be very shallow and even arrogant. Maybe the author's undergraduate studies gave them some particular information that I (as a female - or as a Catholic) did not have available to me about how my Church degraded "women for centuries"? I appreciate the somewhat charitable attempt to say that my Church doesn't "degrade women" as it "formerly" did - but the truth is that the Church has never taught anything that degraded women. And I reject that notion - it is unsubstantiated and uninformed. Any examples the author (or anyone in agreement) might provide would crumble when examined in context. And what authority does the author have to 'assert' what the Church would or would not be just

Posted on 08/24/2007 at 10:08:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 11 of 11
 
Most Commented On