Richard Chichakli - Accountant to the Merchant of Death

Does Assisting an Illegal Arms Dealer Make You Less Culpable for the Arms Trade?

By Lisa Thibault Pietsch, published Aug 28, 2007
Published Content: 32  Total Views: 83,387  Favorited By: 8 CPs
Rating: 4.7 of 5
Richard Chichakli claims that on April 26, 2005, the United States Department of Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) unjustifiably froze his assets, assassinated his life, and destroyed his family and business without due-process. He further claims that the cause of the Treasury Department's action was an alleged existing business relation between himself and Vicktor Bout who was sanctioned by Treasury Department on July 2004. He also claims that the agents who searched his office seized more than $500,000 in valuables, including a boxful of diamonds and a stack of $1,000 bills.

It seems to me, as it would to anyone who can read, that the Treasury Department's actions were completely justifiable.

Chichakli claims to have never been the financial manager or accountant of Vicktor Bout, and to have only known him some twelve years ago and then only dealt with him on few occasions, all prior to Bout's being sanctioned by the Treasury Department in July 2004. Chichlaki claims "I was used as scapegoat, nothing more, and nothing less."

I've been following the career of Vicktor Bout for some time now and only one name, other than his brother's, keeps showing up in interviews and articles. That name is Richard Chichakli. I'd like to share with you just a few of Chichakli's claims and the evidence that seems to refute it quite well.

On July, 2, 2007, Chichakli stated that in order to do an interview with Al-Jazeera about the AK-47 rifle and Vicktor Bout's trafficking in such weapons, he would have to actually research Bout. To claim that he had to research the background of Vicktor Bout, a man that he knew twelve years ago, is downright laughable! In fact, in August of 2003, Richard Chichakli was a confidant of Vicktor Bout's and facilitated an interview with Bout, Bout's brother and himself for a reporter named Peter Landesman.

Takeaways
  • Employee but not associated?
  • Friend & brother but knows nothing
Did You Know?
Do you know any CPA's in the United States that keep boxes of loose diamonds in their office safes?
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
 
Message 3 Continued: ...watches, cars, etc., do need to be, first--acquired, then--transported to the place of sale, and lastly--stored at the place of sale/secure location. I would have been very surprised if Dr. Chichakli have put the diamonds on a tree to deny access to burglars, glued them to the wall to prevent from being stolen, made them invisible somehow like a magician. No, he did not do that--he, the crazy guy (as I can conclude from your writing), kept the inventory of cut diamonds that he imported with all the supporting purchase/customs docs available in his office safe. Is it possible he was awaiting a buyer to come and see the inventory the next day? If you are asking why an accountant would do such a shameful thing as importing cut diamonds for sale and keeping them sacure in a place of trade? Any American can start any business at any time if they are not restricted by law and are ready, willing and able to engage in business of trading LEGAL commodities. I hope

Posted on 09/11/2007 at 3:09:00 PM

 
Furthermore, I would like to point out that you, Ms. Pietche, are making very deceiving statements and implicating individuals as liers and criminals through your use of extremely doubtful and mind-numbing conclusions. Do you think, that it is a coincidence that Dr. Chichakli's wife of three years and who is of Russian origin also lives in Moscow? Shall Dr. Chichakli listen to your suggestion and immediately move out of Moscow simply because Mr. Viktor Bout lives there or somebody else, whom YOU consider a danger to the world, resides in Russia? I wanted to accuse you of extreme stupidity, but then have read your credentials and found a reason for the bogus writing--you simply did not have time to create a piece actually worth reading--changing diapers, taking care of babies, husband, family, etc. I also understand that a housewife that gets diamonds as gifts from Zales or Gordon Jewelers for Christmas would not understand that cut diamonds, just like other goods--purses, makeup

Posted on 09/11/2007 at 3:09:00 PM

 
I would like to address both, the Fact Finder and Ms. Peach, with respect to the significant scope limitations you have put on your research. You have, purposefully or not, limited your reading materials to the ones either published by the government or by other parties, interested in promotion of the story of Mr. Victor Bout for their own benefits, such as reporters and book-writers. How is it possible, that educated individuals such as yourselves, can write in such a misleading way? Why, Ms. Peach, whould you say that you have followed the career of Mr. VB with such certainty? Did you work for him? Did you hire him to work for you? Are you his spiritual leader or biography writer? What gives you such confidence to write the literary-worthless piece like published here?

Posted on 09/11/2007 at 2:09:00 PM

 
Unbelievable... I am looking for information from people who knew Viktor Bout and/or Richard Chichakli. In the matter of Viktor Bout the entire world, "laterally" is divided into two, on one side there is the whole world, and on the opposite side battling against the entire world is Texas CPA Richard Chichakli. Why would an intelligent person decides to stand against all forces? This is the debate. Send me your comments cbconspiracy@yahoo.com

Posted on 09/08/2007 at 1:09:00 AM

 
20 academic degrees, research is a way of life and a standard vocabulary. I am nor a researcher but Richard Chichakli is, and as such what he said is nothing but normal and standard vocabulary. As to Al-Jazeera interview, I was very sure that Richard said that he researched the AK-47 rather than Bout. Richard said on many occasions that he knew "plenty" about Victor Bout's business, and as far as I know and the US Constitution stipulates it is no crime to know about anyone or anything. The documents posted on Chichakli's web site, and particularly the time-line of his encounters of Victor Bout clearly indicate that he knew Bout in 1995 for about one year as (1) of the (160) operators in Sharjah free zone. Then in 1998 as he was hired by Bout to assess the viability of taking Bout's company public in South Africa. The records filed by OFAC in court as a defendant in the law suit brought by Richard against the Federal Government, fully corroborate Richard's claims. Given that the

Posted on 08/31/2007 at 4:08:00 PM

 
Well, Lisa Thibault Pietsch, not all who read about Richard Chichakli do agree with what the US government did to him, to his family, and to his business. I personally do not agree nor do I see any justifiable reason for OFAC action despite that I have read about the story and had followed what has been going on since two and a half years. However, I would like to further elaborate on your three questions which are: 1- How can Chichakli say that he had to research Victor Bout since he knew him for 12 years? 2- With his assets frozen, how did Chichakli move from Texas, and why would he go to Syria and then Russia? and 3- Why would a CPA keep 500K in his safe? Now, Richard Chichakli was a fellow professor of accounting and faculty member of Spring Creek College in Plano, Texas; the place we taught together for a couple of years since 1990. Research, is a matter of habit and those who know Richard would have not found the answer surprising, because for a person with more than 20 aca

Posted on 08/31/2007 at 3:08:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
Most Commented On