Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary Homemaking Program Controversy

Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, one of the nation's largest Southern Baptist Seminaries, is including a 23-hour homemaking program at its campus in Fort Wort, Texas. The program consists of classes in nutrition, meal preparation, and textile design. The controversy concerning
Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary Homemaking Program Controversy
 this program is based on the fact that it is only opened to women.

Rachel Hamman, happily married and a stay-at-home mother of two children and author of Bye Bye Boardman: Confessions from A New Breed of Stay At Home-Moms and Mom's Night Out, seen on TheToday Show, August 25, 2007, argued against Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary's Homemaking program.

I contacted Mrs. Hamman about her appearance, on The Today Show, and her stance on Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary Homemaking program. I asked Mrs. Hamman why she thought that the program was such a bad idea?

Ms. Hamman said that, "The course itself, is not fundamentally a bad idea for someone who wants to learn cooking or sewing skills. The point I was trying to make was that if it is designed to lower divorce rates (like the President of the college stated at the beginning of The Today Show's segment¨) then the course is incomplete at best."

Mrs. Hamman is referring to Paige Patterson, President of Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. Mr. Patterson is also quoted as saying on Fox News, August 17, 2007, that "If a woman chooses to say home and she chooses to devote her energies to her husband and to her children and to the development of her home that is noble and not ignoble and we feel that she should ought to have the opportunity. Information found at http://www.subts.edu

I asked Mrs. Hamman if she thought her views on the Southwestern Homemaking program would change if their classes were opened to men? Mrs. Hamman stated that, "Opening the course up to men would be the first step towards making the course less of a sexist statement."

 
Comments 1 - 7 of 7  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

.. Or maybe the church should be the church and the older women equip the younger women as stated in Titus 2. Why are we having a GRADUATE level course in homemaking? It is an isult and a waste of good money.

Posted on 11/12/2007 at 9:11:00 PM

Have you ever looked at the Southern Baptist Convention and what they uphold to and what they did at Southern Seminary the mother flagship of the Southern Baptist Convention. They are CRAZY. They fired a perfectly good professor for basically being a strong woman. It's a long controversy you should find out before you start waving the southern baptist flag, if you want to know anything about Southern Baptists and aren't afraid of seeing the skeletons. Don't tell me they hold completely to biblical teachings. There are many who claim to hold to biblical teachings and kill people in the name of God. Clearing there is an interpretation to scriptures. I believe in scripture being God breathed and inerrant 2Tim. 3:16 and I believe in biblical manhood and womanhood, however I don't know if this program is just that. It is insulting to have a graduate degree program in homemaking. Really? Maybe they should pick up a Martha Stewart magazine. Or maybe the church should be the church and the old

Posted on 11/12/2007 at 9:11:00 PM

The last line of my previous comment should read: If a man is that gung-ho about learning the "traditional role" of a woman, he should learn it from his wife. And what is with the "these people" comment? Southern Baptists are not the only people who embrace a biblical lifestyle - they just refuse to discard their faith in response to criticism by closed-mined persons and tend to have enough support to back themselves up. Nobody is required to follow this path, so dispense with the complaints on behalf of men who most likely could care less...

Posted on 11/06/2007 at 8:11:00 AM

Unfortunately, men in general do not pursue these activities. I, personally would welcome the chance to truly learn the skills offered throught his program-high school home economics just doesn't cut it. As a professional nurse, and now a full-time homemaker, I have lived both aspects of a woman's role in the family. Since when is a "traditional role" such a bad thing? In the past, men worked outside the home, but when it came to running the household, they stayed out of it. "Women's work" is just that - work- and there should not be derision targeted at those women who choose to pursue a more home oriented track. What were the divorce rates when women as a whole were on this path? what are they now? what does it matter? If a woman is happy, and chooses to serve her family in this way, it stands to reason that in most cases, her family will be happy as well. This course is not a cure-all or a divorce-preventer. If a man is that gung-ho about learning the "traditional role" of a woman,

Posted on 11/06/2007 at 8:11:00 AM

As usual the feminist are two-faced. They claim to want women to be allowed to choose what they want to do with their life, but the minute a program arises that allows THEM to choose a "traditional" role, then the program is bashed. Let's face it. The feminist only want women to choose THEIR idea what women should be doing. Where's the free choice in that? If women choose to sign up for this, than that's their right. Stop trying to force your ideaologies on others. After all this college is not trying to force itself on you.

Posted on 10/30/2007 at 6:10:00 PM

I don't think it's about shoring up the Evangelical's abysmal divorce rates, it's not even about helping people gain the kinds of skills they need in order to be good homemakers. It's about keeping women in their place. If it had any other objective, men would be able to enroll. But, again, what do you expect from these people?

Posted on 09/06/2007 at 10:09:00 AM

I uncorrectly typed Southwestern Baptist homepage website address. It is actually www.swbts.edu

Posted on 08/30/2007 at 2:08:00 PM

Comments 1 - 7 of 7