Not Just Imus: Many Sports Commentators Should Wash Their Mouths

By Michael Thompson, published Sep 07, 2007
Published Content: 105  Total Views: 20,648  Favorited By: 36 CPs
Rating: 4.6 of 5
Five months ago, sportscasters across the land ripped schlock jock Don Imus for uttering racist language in reference to the black players on the Rutgers University women's basketball team.

Now comes the season for these same commentators to employ what should be an equally offensive slur.

It's used not just on HBO, but on the regular networks.

It's printed in the mainstream newspapers and magazines.

It's the nickname for the professional football team representing Washington, D.C.

It's the R-word for persons of Native American heritage.

No, it can't be justified as being the same as "Chippewas" or "Hurons" or "Seminoles," or even "Indians" or "Chiefs" or "Braves." Those all are legitimate terms for peoples who occupied America long before the Pilgrims.

In contrast, the R-word is a slur on skin color. There is no tribe or ethnic group named for the R-word.

Check out your history. The R-word is the most degrading word that someone else can utter toward a Native American. It's the equivalent of the N-word for those of African heritage, or the W-word for Hispanics, or the C-word for those of Asian persuasion, or the H-word for Caucasians. But somehow it's accepted, while at the same time all of the others are not. This baffles me.

I realize nobody means harm, and I don't mean to appear sanctimonious or holier than though. Please just think about it.

If on this page I were to submit the various racial slurs other than the R-word - or use major profanity, for that matter - I assume such language would be edited out. Shouldn't the R-word be held to the same standards of taste?

Apparently not.

Carlos Mencia tosses all the slurs on Comedy Central these days. He even has multiple words for each individual ethnic group, starting with his own. Maybe Mencia has his place, like Lenny Bruce or Richard Pryor, by showing us how to remove the damage from these degradations simply by declaring them in public over and over. It's sort of like George Carlin with his Seven Words You Can't Say on Television.

Takeaways
  • If you root for a sports team with a Native American based nickname or logo, think:
  • Encountering a Native American, would you utter that nickname?
  • Encountering a Native American, would you display that logo?
Did You Know?
Doug Williams made history for racial advancement in 1989 when he became the first black quarterback to win a Super Bowl. Ironically, he did so with a team with the most racist nickname in all of sports.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 43
Next >>
 
Just babbling here; but back to my original statement that I think there are bigger issues to deal with and I truly believed the naming of teams after "Indians" was intended as a compliment, much like "The Fightin' Irish".

Posted on 10/19/2007 at 9:10:00 PM

 
My understanding of the land the remaining Native tribes were (so generously : >) given to them, called Reservations, gave them full control and tax-exempt status. Being on their own, lead to poverty, which was helped a bit when Casinos brought people to the reservations to gamble. That has led to today's issue with enterprising people with a scant amount of "native blood" declaring themselves tribes in order to open Casinos in more Urban areas. An example of lost revenue might be, that I could go up to Compton if I were a gambler, rather than to the nearest Reservation gambling joint in nearby Nevada. I am unclear with the issue of taxes; one tribe has reached an agreement with the US government to pay a higher tax in return for allowing more slot machines.

Posted on 10/19/2007 at 9:10:00 PM

 
Some of those tribes did capture people from other tribes to offer them as human sacrifices (usually virgin females or children) to their gods. Some of those tribes did war with other ones (over territory, hunting grounds rights and so on). I think I would like living in a tent or teepee, picking up and moving when the weather got too hot or too cold; but most people can not tolerate a weekend of camping or roughing it, so I think for all the bad stuff, life has improved for many as the years passed.

Posted on 10/19/2007 at 8:10:00 PM

 
Which brings me back to: we can not do a darn thing about what was done in the past, but we can try to do something about bad stuff today. But since we are in the past, I will start with the naming of the Continent, because that is rather accepted today as is calling US citizens "Americans". So that rather than "Native Americans" perhaps, Mohawk-Americans, Cherokee-Americans, Pawnee-Americans would be better names. Because, yes, some of those different tribes did scalp people.

Posted on 10/19/2007 at 8:10:00 PM

 
People that study such things say all human life began in the area now called the African continent. Studies of European countries that exist as we know them today, were also formed during the Roman Empire whose soldiers moved North and captured and killed peoples living on those lands. So that crossing the seas and doing likewise was rather the type of barbaic behavior that was common in those days. The US seems to be continuing such behavior today. (as well as other nations to a lesser degree)

Posted on 10/19/2007 at 8:10:00 PM

 
I like Jacques bit of levity. History is a horror. The Vikings were already trading with people who lived on this Continent and I forget who is charged with naming the people's "Indians" thinking he had reached the West Indies. People who study such things, digging up bones and proposing historical accuracy, pretty much agree that the peoples got to this land by crossing the Bering Strait and migrating south and east. Or the natives were of Asian ancestry.

Posted on 10/19/2007 at 8:10:00 PM

 
Jacques, after speaking with you privately, I see that you are much more pleasant than you appear in that article. I'm so glad you contacted me. Anyway, thank you for at least admitting that there are other Chiefs who do not agree with you. I couldn't find the lady's name on MySpace who is in charge of petitions at NMU and she's graduated now, so I had no choice but to give up on my search for her. As for the cancer comment, whew, how catty but so true. As for the counter-campaign, I completely understand. With Natives dying off at the pace that they were due to diseases brought from outsiders, it's much more difficult to have a stronger basis to fight it off. But again, if you don't mind, then that makes it that much easier for the team names to continue. Would you have an issue with that?

Posted on 09/23/2007 at 10:09:00 AM

 
Jacques Boulerice: So I guess that as a person of the Mohawk tribe, you would not mind that Muskegon's minor league hockey team is the Muskegon Mohawks, but you would not appreciate the inevitable headlines such as "Mohawk icers scalp visitors" or "Mohawks tomahawk Kalamazoo." Fair enough. But believe me, knowing the sportswriter mentality or lack of such, those headlines will continue as long as the team has that name. Thank you for checking my writeup.

Posted on 09/12/2007 at 11:09:00 PM

 
If I may enter a bit of levity here, I have at times responded to the way Natives have been treated by the European invaders in this manner: 1) Wooden Indians were used in front of tobacco stores in olden days because tobacco is a Native crop. The white man introduced us to alcohol, and we introduced the white man to cancer. Fair trade. 2) The Lone Ranger's Indian companion was named Tonto, which is a Spanish expression for "dumb" or "stupid". Tonto knew what that meant, and what most people don't know id that "Kemo Sabe" is an old Indian expression that means "man with no penis".

Posted on 09/12/2007 at 11:09:00 PM

 
There are a lot of very valid points in your article and in the replies. It often amazes people that as a Mohawk Chief, I don't object to these mascot names (and it's also made me some enemies among various tribes). I can definitely see how the "R-word" is being construed as derogatory, and why the Cleveland baseball team logo/icon would seem to also fall in that category. I submit (and if this idea was brought up earlier, I apologize--I didn't read all the comments yet) that because Natives have been culturally trampled since the arrival of the Europeans, there were not enough of us left to mount a significant counter-campaign. Perhaps this will change now that tribes are entering the gambling business and making a lot of money.

Posted on 09/12/2007 at 11:09:00 PM

 
So that by taking away Reservation profits from people living in poverty to begin with is a worse crime than calling a team "The Chiefs", in my eyes. I was aware of a lot of Eminem controversy, just had not heard anyone say he started the movement. I am also well aware that Elvis did not start rock and roll, that black music was made acceptable being covered by or performed by white artists. I was sorely disappointed when I learned just the other day, that it was true that Jackie Wilson admired Elvis. I could not confirm that Elvis paid for his burial and I believe that is not true. I donated to the group that was helping Jackie while he laid in a coma. I imagine Elvis could have paid for all his care if he thought so highly of Jackie.

Posted on 09/12/2007 at 9:09:00 PM

 
Basically I am cool with whatever the majority decides on this particular issue, because I have bigger fish to fry as the saying goes. Taking away Native American's tax exempt status amd poverty on reservations seems more important issues to solve. I'm not into gambling, but many in this area prefer to spend their gambling money on the Reservations casino's than give it to Donald Trump, etal in Vegas. The Mafia obviously did not pay taxes on their gambling operations (or is the word do?)

Posted on 09/12/2007 at 9:09:00 PM

 
Shamontiel: It has been over a year since I used to regularly sign petitons at Care 2. For all I remember I signed one in favor of the Native Americans that want these names changed. I have little interest in Sports except basketball. But I did think it was dumb to change the Angels name to "Los Angeles Anaheim Angels" (if I have the new title correct) What was wrong with the original more accurate name, except, that perhaps all the players are not angels.

Posted on 09/12/2007 at 8:09:00 PM

 
One baseball team managed to build upon a simple "Chiefs" reference into creating a mascot known as "Chief Nock-A-Homa," which is Tonto language for knocking a home run. Central Michigan University is the "Chippewas," which may seem innocent, but the students don't know how to behave with it and they run around in war paint and so on. Plus headline writers always shorten it to "Chips," which I doubt is how tribal members address one another. The Cleveland Indians have a fellow up top in the stands who pounds on a huge war drum between pitches to "drum up" some hits and runs for the home team. So, it does not take an over-the-top racist name such as Washington's to still bring forth racist behavior.

Posted on 09/12/2007 at 11:09:00 AM

 
However, I do understand that some people may not be as passionate about it as others. However, Alyce, the guy who you referred to contacted me personally, and his response was much more polite than the article. He also commented on another article of mine and does see the immediacy in pointing out issues of racism. While he may not view the names as racist, although I was confused because he did say he respected my opinion and I expected him to say it was stupid, I won't budge on thinking they are. Maybe chief isn't so bad, but very arrogant. However the name Redskins is like calling a team Blackies or Coloreds, in my eyes.

Posted on 09/12/2007 at 10:09:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 43
Next >>
Most Commented On