Why We Can't Afford to Let John Howard Win the 2007 Election
By Elite hacker, published Aug 31, 2007
Published Content: 17 Total Views: 3,859 Favorited By: 0 CPs
Firstly, the Howard government prides itself to be have strong economic policies which is responsible for Australia's strong position in the global market, or so he wants us voters to believe. The fact is, he is doing more bad than good, as most economists can tell you, having a surplus in the budget does not automatically mean that everything is going well, sometimes having a deficient is not all bad. The Howard government in its attempt to keep the budget in the green has been selling national assets; first there was the airport, Qantas and now Telstra. These are essential pieces of infrastructure that can't afford to go into foreign hands. Telstra owns most of the infrastructure that our internet and phone systems run on, the thought of having a foreign company providing those services to me is unimaginable. It's not because I'm racist, it has got nothing to do with that, it is because being owned by the government puts the power in our, the voter's hands as it makes them answerable to us the public. If they do anything against the best interest of the Australian public, then we can give them a piece of our minds come election time, however if the company is in foreign hands, we do not have a say at all. Selling off important infrastructure was a grave mistake.
You may also like...
- John Howard's Liberal Party Loses Federal Election in Australia
- Orlando Magic's Dwight Howard Becomes a Father with Royce Reed
- Election of 1908: Roosevelt Abdicates to William Howard Taft
- Education and Health Care in Australia
- The Politics of Jesus by John Howard Yoder
- An Open Letter to Barack Obama
- Equity & Respect!
- I Think I Can Beat John Bolton - Literally
- John Donne's Use of Metaphorical Conceit
- John Lennon and the Beatles Covered in Avalanche of New Books
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Most Commented On

