Michigan Democrats and HR 162: Have Families and Children Been Betrayed?

Learn About House Resolution 162

By Angela Pedersen, R.N., published Sep 07, 2007
Published Content: 25  Total Views: 5,750  Favorited By: 7 CPs
Rating: 4.5 of 5
On Saturday, August 18, 2007, a national rally was held in Washington, DC in honor of Family Preservation Day.
To commemorate this special day, a resolution was introduced in the State House of Representatives on August 8 by Rep. Glenn Steil. This resolution, HR 162, had bi-partisan support, with ten Democrats joining nineteen Republicans as co-sponsors.

HR 162 failed, because it was passed to Rep. Brenda Clack's Family and Children's Services Committee, and she declined to respond to requests to take up the resolution. House Democrat Floor Leader Steve Tobocman refused requests that HR 162 be "discharged to the floor", which would free it from the committee process, and free it up for immediate discussion and a vote. These requests were verified by Phillip Wurm of the non-profit organization A Child's Right.

Phillip Wurm, the West Michigan Regional Director of A Child's Right, further verified that Democratic Floor Leader Tobocman's office repeatedly stated the resolution was only about joint custody (in a divorce/separation matter), and would not discharge it to the floor. Tobocman's largest problem was that the date of the rally was put in the resolution, so to pass the resolution would be to endorse the rally.

Following is the wording for House Resolution 162:

Michigan Democrats and HR 162: Have Families and Children Been Betrayed?

Information verified by Phillip Wurm - West Michigan Regional Director of A Child's Right

Credit: Angela Pedersen

Copyright: Angela Pedersen

Takeaways
  • Learn about House Resolution 162
  • Michigan Democrats
  • Equal Parenting
Did You Know?
Michigan's Child Custody Laws Have Not Been Updated Since the 1970's
Comments
Showing Comment 1 of 1
 
 
We need to reach out to the Democratic Party and teach them that worshiping the Law Lobby is harming our society. It is time to look at what is truly in the best interest of our children which is for them to continue to have a significant relationship with both fit parents even after a custody dispute.

Posted on 11/10/2007 at 8:11:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comment 1 of 1
 
Most Commented On