TEAM Wins Restraining Order vs. Quixtar

The Quixtar vs. TEAM legal battle heats up across the country, this time in a state where everything's bigger. According to a legal document filed in a Texas Courthouse, the TEAM organization has been granted a temporary
TEAM Wins Restraining Order vs. Quixtar
Date: September 4, 2007
Collins County, TX
United States of America
restraining order (TRO) versus the Quixtar Corporation. The filing limits Quixtar in its dealings with the TEAM's business affairs.

This is the latest court ruling in a battle that began on August 9, TEAM and its heads Orrin Woodward and Chris Brady wanted to end their relationship as trainers for Quixtar, a retail business that was formerly known as Amway in North America. They felt that Quixtar's business dealings were not in compliance and Quixtar rejected TEAM's advice to change their methods.

TEAM separated from Quixtar, a subsidiary of Alticor Inc., and sought to remove the "no compete" clause from their original contract. The "no compete" clause prevents TEAM from setting up their own distribution business; this is central to TEAM's demands, but Quixtar refused to let that part of the contract be voided. TEAM went on to file several restraining orders in courts across the country.

The ruling, which took place in Collin County, Texas, was filed by TEAM in order to keep Quixtar from disparaging its name. The ruling states that Quixtar is not allowed to "directly, or indirectly (interfere with) TEAM's business relationships and expectancies." Quixtar is also not allowed to send any verbal or written communication to TEAM and its related affiliates or Independent Business Owners (IBOs). Furthermore, Quixtar is prevented from terminating or suspending IBOs who currently or in the past worked with TEAM.

The ruling goes on to name a total of 11 limitations that Quixtar must abide by until at least 18 September, according to the document, with a bond of $1,800. The TRO was ordered to be distributed to all IBOs in North America. Quixtar, so far, has been able to win on the legal front. Late last month a judge in Michigan's Kent County ruled in favor of Quixtar on three measures. Michigan is also the home state of Quixtar.

Related information
 
Comments 1 - 6 of 6  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Go Team we are behind you all the way...

Posted on 10/23/2007 at 9:10:00 AM

PAUL YOU ARE APPRECIATED, THANKS OF PUTTING QUIXBOT TEX IN HIS PLACE

Posted on 09/23/2007 at 4:09:00 PM

Go team!you guys are so awsome!!

Posted on 09/16/2007 at 7:09:00 PM

Tex, thanks for not being specific about the "errors" even though the information came from a court document you can link to in my article.

Posted on 09/10/2007 at 1:09:00 PM

Paul, Thanks for making several substantial errors in your posting.

Posted on 09/09/2007 at 7:09:00 AM

Paul, Thanks for posting this and getting the truth out there!

Posted on 09/07/2007 at 5:09:00 AM

Comments 1 - 6 of 6