TEAM Wins Restraining Order vs. Quixtar
By Paul Bright, published Sep 06, 2007
Published Content: 283 Total Views: 333,132 Favorited By: 27 CPs
This is the latest court ruling in a battle that began on August 9, TEAM and its heads Orrin Woodward and Chris Brady wanted to end their relationship as trainers for Quixtar, a retail business that was formerly known as Amway in North America. They felt that Quixtar's business dealings were not in compliance and Quixtar rejected TEAM's advice to change their methods.
TEAM separated from Quixtar, a subsidiary of Alticor Inc., and sought to remove the "no compete" clause from their original contract. The "no compete" clause prevents TEAM from setting up their own distribution business; this is central to TEAM's demands, but Quixtar refused to let that part of the contract be voided. TEAM went on to file several restraining orders in courts across the country.
The ruling, which took place in Collin County, Texas, was filed by TEAM in order to keep Quixtar from disparaging its name. The ruling states that Quixtar is not allowed to "directly, or indirectly (interfere with) TEAM's business relationships and expectancies." Quixtar is also not allowed to send any verbal or written communication to TEAM and its related affiliates or Independent Business Owners (IBOs). Furthermore, Quixtar is prevented from terminating or suspending IBOs who currently or in the past worked with TEAM.
The ruling goes on to name a total of 11 limitations that Quixtar must abide by until at least 18 September, according to the document, with a bond of $1,800. The TRO was ordered to be distributed to all IBOs in North America. Quixtar, so far, has been able to win on the legal front. Late last month a judge in Michigan's Kent County ruled in favor of Quixtar on three measures. Michigan is also the home state of Quixtar.
TEAM Wins Restraining Order vs. Quixtar
Date: September 4, 2007Location:
Collins County, TX USA
You may also like...
- Quixtar Fires Team Trainers
- Judge Denies Quixtar's Contempt Charges Against TEAM
- Quixtar Wins Abstention vs. TEAM in California
- Quixtar Wins Decisions in Lawsuit
- Ten Facts Quixtar & Amway Don't Want You to Know About!
- Grand Rapids: Second To None
- MLM; ( Multi-Level Marketing)What is It?
- Why I Walked Away from Quixtar-Amway
- The Problem with Quixtar & Amway
- Quixtar: What Quixtar Is
Takeaways
- Quixtar is prevented from posting inflammatory information against TEAM on official online sources
- TEAM has another injunction filed in California that states Quixtar is an illegal pyramid scheme
- TEAM seeks to have the "no compete" clause in its contract waived
Most Commented On


Honey
Add a Comment
Posted on 10/23/2007 at 9:10:00 AM
NOT A SUBJECT OF THE KING
Add a Comment
Posted on 09/23/2007 at 4:09:00 PM
melanie ettenger
Add a Comment
Posted on 09/16/2007 at 7:09:00 PM
Paul Bright
Add a Comment
Posted on 09/10/2007 at 1:09:00 PM
Tex
Add a Comment
Posted on 09/09/2007 at 7:09:00 AM
SPARTAN 4LIFE
Add a Comment
Posted on 09/07/2007 at 5:09:00 AM