Is pollution offsetting global warming?
Credit: Ray Forester | ©http://www.morguefile.com/forum/profile.php?username=lightfoot
Global Dimming: Why Pollution is Good, Up is Down and China is Our Best Friend
Global dimming is a new scientific theory that will warm every gas guzzling, toxin dumping, and smog-eating heart in America; in short, some climatologists now believe that pollution is saving our lives.
For a long time, we debated whether or not global warming was real. When the science couldn't be denied and even America's Oil Exec-In-Chief pronounced that global climate change was not a hoax, the debate shifted to whether or not human beings had anything to do with it. As it turns out, not only do we have something to do with global warming-our complete lack of respect for the environment may also be saving us from it.
The idea of global dimming is simple-human beings are throwing so much filth into the air that we're blocking out the sunlight that would otherwise reach us and accelerate the already run-away process of global warming. Because we're trashing our planet and blotting out the sun, scientists calculate that we may actually be preventing about two degrees of planetary heat.
Those two degrees may be the difference between our glib dismissal of an unprecedented number of category five storms as part of "the natural climate cycle" and our having to suffer the cataclysmic effects of global warming that a certain former Vice President has been warning about.
In the first week of September, NOVA aired an investigative program entitled "The Dimming of the Sun." In it, scientists discussed their findings that only a few days of suspended air travel in the aftermath of September 11th resulted in a marked temperature change in the atmosphere, indicating that the effects of American atmospheric pollution have been vastly underestimated to date.
Scientists also have a wealth of evidence showing that smog and air pollution have reduced the amount of sunlight that reaches the earth's surface. This global dimming, brought about by the same air pollution that has caused rampant respiratory ailments in human beings, is also thought to have caused droughts and famines around the world.
For a long time, we debated whether or not global warming was real. When the science couldn't be denied and even America's Oil Exec-In-Chief pronounced that global climate change was not a hoax, the debate shifted to whether or not human beings had anything to do with it. As it turns out, not only do we have something to do with global warming-our complete lack of respect for the environment may also be saving us from it.
The idea of global dimming is simple-human beings are throwing so much filth into the air that we're blocking out the sunlight that would otherwise reach us and accelerate the already run-away process of global warming. Because we're trashing our planet and blotting out the sun, scientists calculate that we may actually be preventing about two degrees of planetary heat.
Those two degrees may be the difference between our glib dismissal of an unprecedented number of category five storms as part of "the natural climate cycle" and our having to suffer the cataclysmic effects of global warming that a certain former Vice President has been warning about.
In the first week of September, NOVA aired an investigative program entitled "The Dimming of the Sun." In it, scientists discussed their findings that only a few days of suspended air travel in the aftermath of September 11th resulted in a marked temperature change in the atmosphere, indicating that the effects of American atmospheric pollution have been vastly underestimated to date.
Scientists also have a wealth of evidence showing that smog and air pollution have reduced the amount of sunlight that reaches the earth's surface. This global dimming, brought about by the same air pollution that has caused rampant respiratory ailments in human beings, is also thought to have caused droughts and famines around the world.
Comments
John Locke
(Guest)
(Guest)
09/30/2009
I had to use this for a report. Thanks so much!!
best online bingo site
(Guest)
(Guest)
01/21/2009
Today the most inmortant word is scientist and the most common talktive matter is Pollutio. Even pollution is very bad for us but According to the Global Warming Scientists also have a wealth of evidence showing that smog and air pollution have reduced the amount of sunlight that reaches the earth's surface. This global dimming, brought about by the same air pollution that has caused rampant respiratory ailments in human beings, is also thought to have caused droughts and famines around the world.
best online bingo site
best online bingo site
(Guest)
(Guest)
01/21/2009
Today the most inmortant word is scientist and the most common talktive matter is Pollutio. Even pollution is very bad for us but According to the Global Warming Scientists also have a wealth of evidence showing that smog and air pollution have reduced the amount of sunlight that reaches the earth's surface. This global dimming, brought about by the same air pollution that has caused rampant respiratory ailments in human beings, is also thought to have caused droughts and famines around the world.
ryan brown
(Guest)
(Guest)
11/13/2008
Lenox is overrated
tom vear
(Guest)
(Guest)
11/13/2008
hey this site really helped thanks
Carissa and Anthony
(Guest)
(Guest)
10/31/2008
we had to do a report on this well a debate and thankc because this helped alot..!!!!!
Merci Anthony .P AKA BONO, Carissa AKA CHRIS.
Carissa and anthony
(Guest)
(Guest)
10/30/2008
we ahd top do a report too and this site helped alot thanx!!:)
Pollution Dude
(Guest)
(Guest)
04/22/2008
WOW
this is a very good article about global warming and stuff!
u rule man!
i'm doin dis weird report for diis weird dude bout pollution
and dis site helpd a lot!
thx;D
I love articles like this!
Good article. Those arguments remind me of the far right columnist Thomas Sowell. Uncle Tom once proclaimed during the Clinton years that the federal gov. was guilty of murder for giving incentives to consumers who bought smaller, more fuel efficient cars. It seems, according to Sowell's "logic" that since small vehicles owners were more likely to die in a crash than owners of big tuna boat gas guzzlers, that constituted "murder".
Comments 1 - 10 (of 10)
|
|