Another Perspective on Pet Rental

Along with gaining National attention, FlexPetz, the newly founded pet rental company, has also received a lot of controversy. Admittedly, when I first became aware of the concept of renting out dogs for short periods of time, I also found it a bit repulsive and unethical. Further research into the workings of the company eased some of most of my misgivings.

Like most people, I thought the animals couldn't possibly fare well emotionally with constantly being uprooted and shipped around from place to place and person to person. But then I learned that the dogs only have as many 'owners' as they can handle, which normally is no more than 3 at most. This would give them a little more stability and I could deal with that because I've heard of couples that split and share 'custody' of pets they've accrued together when they were still in a relationship. Apparently those pets fared pretty well and adapted to having 2 separate 'homes' and 'families'. Furthermore, Flexpetz dogs live unkenneled among their pack with one primary caregiver when they are not visiting with a member.

Secondly, I worried that some of the people pursuing this sort of arrangement might have bad intentions for 'use' or 'abuse' of the animals. Fortunately, Flexpetz seems to have this avenue covered as well. To take participate in this arrangement, one must first register and become a member. A great deal of information is gathered from the potential member as well as a meeting with a certified dog trainer. The member has to take a training session in which he must demonstrate the qualities of a 'good', responsible dog owner. This means showing that he is compassionate, patient, kind, etc. Next, a document, which has been provided to Flexpetz by PETA, is signed stating that the potential member has not had a history of violence or abuse toward animals and that he will treat all Flexpetz dogs with respect.