An Argument for the Justification of Terrorism
If a person is devoted to their religion and someone is trying to take it away from them, then he or she has the right to protect themselves. When the opposing force is so large that they have no way of defending themselves and they have no one else to stand up for them then they are justified in becoming a terrorist. They risk their lives to protect their beliefs and show selflessness by saving them for others. This is what Kamel Daoudi is doing, he believes that his religion is the"" key target of the U.S. forces and other "iniquitous powers" and that he must protect it,
"The Algerian war, the Bosnian war, the gulf war, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Palestine, Lebanon... all of these events strengthen my conviction that the Judeo-Christian community influenced by atheism has a visceral hatred of the community of Muhammad ... For all these reasons and because of all these events which have left indelible wounds, I went over to the forces of the "dark side"..." (Sciolino)
You may also like...
- The Justification of Supreme Emergency in Michael Walzer's Just and Unjust Wars
- An Critical Philosophical Examination of the Road to War in Iraq
- Guantanamo Bay: The Interrogation Practices and Facilities Violate International Law
- Ethical Justification for Terrorism
- The Spread of Democracy
- The Power of Story and Effective Storytelling
- A Citizen's Guide to the NSA Domestic Wiretapping Program
- Ethics of Torture
- Sick Sad Week: An Urgent Call to End the Coulterization of Debate at Associated Content
- The Geneva Convention
Takeaways
- Use of Terrorism
- When is it ok?
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Most Commented On


