Find » Society » Hispanic Heritage Month: How it All...

Hispanic Heritage Month: How it All Started

Yes, There's a Reason for Spanning Both September and October

By Michael Thompson, published Sep 13, 2007
Published Content: 300  Total Views: 121,557  Favorited By: 54 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.8 of 5
Why would an ethnic group, or any group for that matter, choose to designate "a month" from September 15 to October 15? Why not just pick a full month and start on the first day? Well, there is an explanation for Hispanic Heritage Month courtesy of the Fact Monster web site. Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua all declared their independence on the date of September 15. Mexico's Fourth of July equivalent is September 16 and Chile's is September 18.

OK, that's settled. If you live in a community with any fair to significant proportion of Hispanic populace, you should be able to identify local events during days to come.

Now, for some more history:

-- In 1968, President Lyndon Johnson signed a U.S. Congress declaration to establish the first Hispanic History Week. Expansion to a full month (or halves of two months) took place in 1988.

-- Just whom to we mean when we say "Hispanic Americans?" In total, according to the Census Bureau, we now mean 44 million Americans, or 14 percent of the population, having surpassed African Americans as the nation's largest ethnic minority.

-- Census takers say can define the 44 million in this manner, based on nation of extended family origin: Mexico 67 percent, Puerto Rico 9 percent, Cuba 4 percent, Central and South American nations 14 percent, other nations 6 percent. (This doesn't count the 4 million residents of Puerto Rico itself, a U.S. territory.

- There are some unfortunate matters to history as well, such as the United States' use of empire-building brute force to seize what now is known as the Southwest. And today, of course, immigration policy and "English only" are among divisive issues. Some events in the Heritage Month will focus on these topics, but in general the tone is more celebratory.

In terms of culture, Hispanics today are part of our salad bowl of a nation.(Not to be trite, but "salad bowl" is intended to show how each item retains its own flavor within the mix, as opposed to the "melting pot" view in which various flavors are watered down.)

Hispanic Heritage Month: How it All Started
Takeaways
  • At least seven nations of Hispanic heritage became independent on mid-September dates.
Comments
Comments 1 - 12 of 12
 
 
latino oya

Posted on 10/23/2007 at 6:10:00 AM

 
Not to generalize, but it's the truth generally. When I was young, Hispanics (I will go back to that; it is the most all-encompassing term) seemed to ally with the civil rights movement and worthy causes. This is captured when you hear of someone winning a "King-Chavez-Parks" scholarship or grant. Then there started a streak where maybe 30-40 percent of Hispanics would vote for Reagan and the Bushies, etc. Definitely there used to be an alliance of color that no longer exists, or no longer has the strength. P.S.: I remember now how one of the Bush kids married mixed with a Hispanic woman, and Bush 41 called his granddaughter "my little brown one" ...... and got away with it!

Posted on 09/25/2007 at 11:09:00 AM

 
Oh, as for the get-in-the-game reference, I can understand that. Most issues on race usually come down to Black versus White although Natives should be screaming as loud as Blacks and other cultures as well.

Posted on 09/25/2007 at 10:09:00 AM

 
The 'a' in Spanish is to distinguish feminine words from male words. Latina is a _________ woman and Latino is a ____________ man. As for Mexicans, yeah, Mexicans don't seem to have a problem being called that (unless you deal with the Texas separation issues), but you can't just walk up to a Puerto Rican, Cuban, Dominican person and call them a Mexican. That's like calling me Jamaican. Black people from other regions get that issue a lot. They're called African Americans when they really are Jamaican or African or Bohemian and so forth.

Posted on 09/25/2007 at 10:09:00 AM

 
When I was a kid, the term was "Mexicans" and it was not considered a slur back in the early '60s. I was at Delta College in the '70s, it was "Chicano Awareness Week." Then "Hispanic" came into play and it officially is Hispanic Heritage Month. I've seen "Latina" as opposed to "Latino." Saginaw city is about 45 percent black, 45 percent white, 10 percent Latino (my reference of choice). During the 1980s, the first Latino city councilman J. David Perez stated to me: "I feel like I am standing at the side of a ping-pong game, the blacks and whites batting the ball at each other, the Latinos not able to get in the game." I don't whether that was a fair statement or not, but that was how Dave felt, and he reflected the feelings of others. Sad.

Posted on 09/23/2007 at 1:09:00 PM

 
Alyce, I read in some college studies book that the proper term would be Chicano because it is a name made up from the people, just like African American is for Blacks. However, I talked to a Dominican guy who said he prefers Latino for the same reasons; it's a name that they created. I don't use the word Hispanic at all now, but then when I hear Latinos use it, it confuses me. In that aspect, I finally understand how there are White people who are hesitant at what they should call Blacks. Anyway, going back to the point of this article, good history. My high school had a heavy Latino population, and the students were always invited to come see the music concerts that were thrown in the auditorium. If not for my high school, I would know nothing about Latino culture.

Posted on 09/23/2007 at 10:09:00 AM

 
OK, now Alyce, I don't know, maybe we need to propose a fund-raiser for you to replace the keyboard upon which you have typed so exhausively that the numbers and letters are wiped out. Must admit that you probably know more than 100 times more than me about this. Was just trying to put something out there to get people to start thinking. Can only add: As good as the Jena 6 was, still was feeling some sadness that our world was coming to this. Tried a couple of soul-healing songs from my teen years on YouTube by the group known as "War" -- "The World Is A Ghetto" and "Slipping Into Darkness." Was informed in my solance that "War" is considered a band of great Latin influence. Lesson learned: We all strive and ache together.

Posted on 09/21/2007 at 5:09:00 PM

 
I also don't get the replacing US flags with Mexican ones. People that immigrated did not immigrate to Mexico. Vietnamese, Koreans, Indonesians and so on choose US rule. El Salvadorians especially express fear of Mexican law. Those that bypass immigration laws to cross the border, rush through Mexico hoping not to get caught due brutal today treatement by Mexican law enforcement. I wonder if we have a Native American History month. I love traveling through New Mexico and Arizonia where much one can learn much of their culture.

Posted on 09/21/2007 at 4:09:00 PM

 
I do think we are unique in our melting pot diversity that represents people's from worldwide and having a name that does not favor one ethnic group over another in it's name, simply United States. As for English Only, I can not imagine English speaking people going into a non-English speaking country and demanding the country change their language to our own. For the La Razas to demand we declare Spanish the USA National Language is an insult to all other immigrant groups that migrated here and assimilated.

Posted on 09/21/2007 at 4:09:00 PM

 
The people living in what is now basically Texas ceded from the Mexican government when they did not like the newly appointed President (ordered by Napoleon). That started a war and the new US was asked to help Texas fight for their independence. Sometime after Mexico lost the war with Texas, the Republic of Texas decided to join with the US as a state. Seizing land by force, committing genocides on natives is how most every country in the world was formed. I do not know why the USA is singled out as the only place that was formed thus.

Posted on 09/21/2007 at 4:09:00 PM

 
The Spanish conquistodors were actually the people who brutally seized what is now known as the Southwest from Native American tribes. Natives of what is now Mexico joined forces with the Spaniards to fight rivals who used their people for human sacrifices and continued moving North into what is now the Southwest to slaughter the Native American tribes. California had disputes between the French, Russian, Spanish and later English explorers. A Papal Bull settled this peacefully.

Posted on 09/21/2007 at 3:09:00 PM

 
Maybe my Latino neigbors are not celebrating the month. Mexican/Americans resent being called Hispanic, because that means "came from Spain" and they are from a Latin American country. Someone recently wrote a letter to our local paper berating someone else for using the word Hispanic and said that Hispanic means Cubans, blacks or Asians. I wrote the paper to correct that, but they did not print it. Back East Puerto Ricans still call themselves Hispanic. The people I have known from El Salvador, Costa Rica or Honduras did not identify themselves with either label. It is nice that there is a month to celebrate the culture. I did not know about the month, so article was informative.

Posted on 09/21/2007 at 3:09:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 12 of 12
 
Advertisment