Who Writes 9/11 Conspiracy Books?

Profile on Author David Ray Griffin

By Will N. Stape, published Sep 21, 2007
Published Content: 335  Total Views: 260,740  Favorited By: 71 CPs
Rating: 4.4 of 5
My essay on 9/11 Conspiracy Theories elicited many comments, both pro and con. One mentioned 9/11 conspiracy books, wondering who wrote them. Surprisingly perhaps, many 9/11 conspiracy books have been published. While conducting research on more popular books, one author's name kept coming up: David Ray Griffin.

To date Mr. Griffin has written five books on 9/11 conspiracy theories - three on his own and two with co-authors. Before going into detail about who David Ray Griffin is, here's a sense of his work, promoting his take on the most devastating terrorist attack in American history and arguably the world. As we know, the 9/11 tragedy precipitated war in the Middle East, which is still being thunderously felt six years later.

1. Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory (Paperback - Mar 30, 2007)

Here Griffin tackles magazine Popular Mechanics.

An emeritus professor of theology with no previous interest in conspiracy theories, Griffin dedicated himself to the "9/11 truth" movement, a group committed to "exposing the falsity of the official theory about 9/11," and this book is a thorough, highly detailed attempt to do just that. As Griffin aptly notes, "the assumption that conspiracy theories are inherently irrational" has recently taken root in American culture, making any attack on the official government record instantly dismissible, but Griffin takes to the difficult task with solid reasoning and true zeal. - Excerpt from Publisher's Weekly

2. 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, Vol. 1 by David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott (Paperback - Aug 23, 2006)

Here Griffin writes about those who are skeptical of "official theory."

Who Writes 9/11 Conspiracy Books?

9/11 Books.

Credit: Will N. Stape

Copyright: Will N. Stape

Takeaways
  • 9/11 Conspiracy author David Ray Griffin is a theologian.
  • Griffin has written five books on 9/11 conspiracy theories.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 13 of 13
 
 
I saw Farenheit 911 and I know all the "facts" you list - it's the way you use facts that matter. You "distort" facts. Go do civic work in your community - go to a homeless shelter and volunteer. Do something that makes a difference in America, instead of spouting stale crap for the rest of your life.

Posted on 09/27/2007 at 9:09:00 AM

 
To say theres no proof of a cover-up, or conspiracy is foolish. It would take you a month of solid research to cover the evidence, research papers, articles, timelines, etc, and come out with a solid understanding of what happened that day. Science is behind us 100%, the laws of physics were NOT sleeping on the 11th. The real conspiracy is the official story. You want me to believe that 19 hijackers with box cutters, took control of four planes, hit 75% of their targets, AND somehow talked CHENEY into a STAND DOWN ORDER?!?! WHAT. That they talked the military into running 15 wargames that day so the plan would go down without those pesky F-16's getting in their way? That they planted explosives into three of the WTC buildings?!? (Bush's brother ran security) That they conned the FBI into hiding ALL EVIDENCE of the attack? That they warned high level officials NOT to fly that day? That they talked the bush administration into covering up every question that the victims families had

Posted on 09/26/2007 at 12:09:00 PM

 
Charlotte said something in jest, which highlights this. In Jacques world there are no terrorists. Attack on USS Cole -I guess it was our "government too" First attack on WTC with truck bombs, I guess those weren't terrorists either. Face it Jacques, you live in a country hated by a great many people. Instead of seeking to divide your fellow Americans with this groundless theory, try uniting fellow Americans and fight real villains: Foreign terrorists who time and again have attacked us, our allies in the UK and places far too numerous to mention here. Focus on UNIFICATION not DIVISION.

Posted on 09/24/2007 at 9:09:00 AM

 
Jacques, many scientists have faith. Painting faith and scientific expertise as mutually exclusive is a desperate argument. One doesn't preclude the other. Regarding "physical evidence" there's none for controlled demolition. Properly decoding video of 9/11 requires things you lack: A scientifically trained mind and resources of cutting edge technology. Example: I could show video of the internal biological process of an organism. You would be clueless to what's happening, since you're no biologist. Therefore, those lacking scientific training have no business calling what "really happened" on 9/11. Your trip to WTC before it was finished is nice, but just as I wouldn't expect a data entry clerk to understand code a complex program a software team designed, I don't expect hired hands who connect support struts to understand physics of skyscraper design.

Posted on 09/24/2007 at 9:09:00 AM

 
I agree that religion is based on "faith", and not scientific principles. My question is: the physical and video evidence is there that the plane crashes could NOT have caused the WTC collapse, still you refuse to believe what your eyes have seen. By the same token you believe in a "cosmic magician" whose existence cannot be proven because of "faith" based on stories from thousands of years ago. By doing so you've abandoned your "scientific credibility". Final word: being a Mohawk chief allowed me access to the WTC construction site as it was going up in those pre-terrorist fear days because some of the engineers and crew were from my tribe. As I was told then, "it would take many bombs or a small atomic device to bring this baby down".

Posted on 09/24/2007 at 12:09:00 AM

 
Good job reporting on the topic but I've heard so much crap spouted that I refuse to listen to any of it anymore. People on both sides have lost their minds on this subject blaming everyone but the terrorists who carried out the attacks. Oh, wait, I forgot. There is no such thing as a terrorists.

Posted on 09/23/2007 at 4:09:00 PM

 
Jacques, you're mixing apples and oranges. A religion is based on faith, not scientific principals. When I switch on a light, it works through science. When I pray to my God, I have nothing to go on but my faith. You do have a point though, the Crusades were death meted out against those who didn't believe. Just as Islamic extremists meted out death on 9/11. Thanks for that. I couldn't make a better parallel. But the fact still remains: Evidence? Religion is based on FAITH. You don't need evidence. Science, like "controlled demolition" there you have a big problem. You have no evidence, yet still accuse our government of lying and murder. Christians, Muslims or Jews believe through faith. They don't accuse a nation of "crime". Mixing the two is desperate and a most ineffective argument.

Posted on 09/23/2007 at 1:09:00 PM

 
I don't recall seeing any names mentioned, and if a statement has no merit or truth, it can't insult somebody. Perhaps the "Christian slant" of the book has a parallel as there is nothing but hearsay and hand-me-down campfire stories as basis for the Bible, yet you can't deny that huge amounts of people believe what the Bible says is absolutely true. Where are the "facts" to prove the Bible is anything more than the world's first science fiction story, and why not pick on those believers too? Several thousand people died on 9/11, yet over the years Christianity has caused millions of deaths as non-believers were systematically wiped off the face of the Earth, but the Crusades, the Inquisition, and the decimation of Native Americans are just "theories" with no proof, aren't they?

Posted on 09/23/2007 at 11:09:00 AM

 
People believe in things supported by evidence to back up belief. Then there's desperate gullible people who grasp at straws with no evidence nor qualified people to support it other than guesswork & empty theories. Calling me or Carol Gilbert or those who doesn't subscribe to your radical baseless theories "sheep" would be an insult if it weren't comical. Offer one shred of evidence 9/11 was a vast conspiracy involving hundreds of "insiders", I might agree. Something tells me it won't happen anytime soon. Who's more a "sheep" those who believe in scientific evidence or those who believe wisps and shadows in the night with no proof?

Posted on 09/22/2007 at 2:09:00 PM

 
Oh sure, Griffin would have to be from my home state. ;) The fact that his books have a Christian stamp might make them more interesting from a biblical perspective (or just on the events themselves and their worldwide implications for our future). But I agree that trying to give an all-encompassing picture based on a wide knowledge base is almost impossible and worthy of being knocked down. The complexities behind the structural engineering of the Twin Towers alone requires a considerable education to get a full picture. And if you rely on outside sources to provide insight...you're taking wild chances without checking their true credentials first. All put together, though, I believe that there was likely a deliberate ignoring of a major threat with nothing more than that. If the Bush Administration wanted something to happen (which has its own shadings of fact or fiction)...ignoring the potential threats was all that was necessary.

Posted on 09/22/2007 at 12:09:00 PM

 
One of the problems of people in this country is that they're rapidly becoming "human sheep". A series of mental fence posts and wire is put before them by the government to drive them through a maze, and even though they can see that there is nothing but open space beyond the maze, they refuse to question the need for a maze just because the Feds put it there. I know people who if I told them the sky is blue on a cloudless sunny day, they'd refuse to believe me unless they went outside first to see for themselves. This is the mentality that drives those who can't believe their leaders are capable of evil acts.

Posted on 09/21/2007 at 11:09:00 PM

 
So there are books on 9/11 conspiracies. Thanks for this

Posted on 09/21/2007 at 3:09:00 PM

 
Enjoyed reading this. It is still hard for me to grasp the level of conspiracy that people are capable of believing in concerning 9/11. Nondisclosure, failure to act on intelligence, cover-up of errors is so vastly different than actively participating in a murderous plot.

Posted on 09/21/2007 at 12:09:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 13 of 13
 
Most Commented On