Why Are High Schools Showing Our Kids the Movie, 300?

When school started this year my son brought home a package of papers from his teachers for me to look through and sign. His world history teacher provided parents with a list of movies he and the other world history teachers plan on showing in the classroom this year.
  One of the movies included on the list is 300.

I had not seen the movie but I figured if it was being shown in the classroom then it must not have too much inappropriate content in it so I went ahead and signed my consent.

Ironically, that same weekend one of my husband's co-workers loaned him the movie. I really wasn't anticipating a good film and wasn't too enthused about watching it. I have to say I was wrong, 300 is an excellent movie.

What I wasn't prepared for was the degree of sex that was depicted in the movie. It is clearly not a movie that should be shown in the classroom and that made me wonder why the school board approved such a movie for classroom viewing. So I decided to make a few calls to get to the bottom of this.

I spoke with the principle of my son's high school on the phone and while she was eager to assist me and very friendly she was not much help. She was not even aware that 300 was on the list of movies and had not seen the movie. She did however; inform me of the method the school uses to determine which movies are put on the list.

According to Merced High School's principle, it is the California State Board of Education that approves the list of movies to be shown in the classroom. From there the list is handed down to individual school districts where someone on the local board hands it down to teachers. In this case Sylvia Smith sits on the board and has concluded that in spite of the explicit content in this movie (i.e. Clearly showing nipples in a sex scene intended for adult's eyes) it is alright to show even though the state regulations are that any rated "r" movie containing nudity and sex is off limits and any movie found to be "borderline questionable" has to be authorized by the parent through written consent first.

 
Comments 1 - 9 of 9  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

well... that is why we look at things and read them completely as well as understand what they are saying before they sign them, especially when it concerns our children. it seems as if the school is following the procedure that you described. anything that is rated "r" or has questionable content has to be signed off by a parent. you signed it....

Posted on 04/11/2009 at 8:04:47 PM

nope I haven't signed off on the consent yet. It's not that I'm worried about him seeing nipples because I know that he has seen them (I've got the proof on my computer lol) I just don't think nipples belong in school. boys have a hard enough time concentrating with all the hot girls running around. LOL it's all those short skirts causing F's. ;)

Posted on 10/31/2007 at 10:10:00 AM

your articles are good

Posted on 10/17/2007 at 7:10:00 AM

My thoughts are this version might be slightly wrong for the classroom considering the violence and sex. However, a classroom discussion will probably occur putting everything into context which I doubt would happen at home or a friend's house. The teacher is I suspect trying to make history cool and spark interest. I think you should speak to the teacher and gauge his/her intentions. When I was a freshman in HS, my English teacher showed us the 60's Italian version of Romeo & Juliet and it really made the Shakespeare relevant.

Posted on 10/15/2007 at 2:10:00 AM

I can see the reason for the controversy. I suppose they figure the 1950's version with Richard Eagen, The 300 Spartans, is not accurate enough. It's also on DVD. Of course, History Channel has it's documentary out on DVD with reenacters, talking heads, and all, but it's not as widely known as the theatrical release or as accessible. Interesting situation.

Posted on 09/14/2007 at 6:09:00 AM

If that happened in Tennessee, mortal hell would surely be raised (A bus driver got canned a few years back for playing Mancow's Morning Madhouse on the radio with high school kids on his bus). I think it is a travesty, and there was no reasonable excuse for showing the film in its unedited state. As for the public school system's "right" to decide what's best for our children, I believe most parents willingly gave the right to them, giftwrapped with a big red bow, every time they abdicated just a little more of their personal responsibility as parents, demanding that teachers do that job in addition to their own!

Posted on 09/13/2007 at 5:09:00 PM

Ok just wanted to let you know, I just talked to the school again and they do show the full version, nothing is edited.

Posted on 09/13/2007 at 2:09:00 PM

that's a good question Carol. I really don't know, I didn't think about that because in the past when the kids have watched movies in the classroom they watch the whole thing stretched out over several days. hmmm now I gotta call back and find out. lol

Posted on 09/13/2007 at 2:09:00 PM

I wonder if they are showing the full length version of the movie? In our schools, there are sometimes edited versions shown that are made available for educational purposes and cut out controversial scenes.

Posted on 09/13/2007 at 2:09:00 PM

Comments 1 - 9 of 9