Find » Technology » Science » The Global Warming Debate: Watts Ha...

The Global Warming Debate: Watts Happening?

By captdallas2, published Sep 13, 2007
Published Content: 207  Total Views: 170,767  Favorited By: 45 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.5 of 5
For something that is a done deal there sure is a lot of debate in the blogosphere over global warming. Steve McIntyre is working on the newly release codes from NASA. Anthony Watts has published his preliminary data on the state of the US weather stations. James Hansen is providing links to his blog posts on the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) site. Roy Spencer has published an article on cloud impacts on long wave radiation, (which I haven't read because it costs nine bucks to download and I am not going to link to it because that sucks).

Caught up in the moment, I tried to brush up on my FORTRAN 77 programming. The six primary brain cells required for that task seem to be on vacation or were damaged in the mid eighties. In any case, Windows Vista does not play well with free version of FORTRAN I downloaded. So I will leave that task to geekier geeks.

While setting up the code, the crew at Climate Audit noted that several of the data sets have changed a couple of times in the last month. Raw data should not change. To follow calculations one has to have a solid starting point and that is the raw data. There may be a large story to come if indeed the raw data is being manipulated. That just ain't Kosher.

In Excel, I did manage to compare a few weather sites that had combined data. There is a noted flaw in the combination procedure. Using the weather year, December through November produced a first year error due to the previous year December having to be estimated from another source. I was able to verify that error, but the overall significance is not known without a much larger sample to determine if a trend exists.

Takeaways
  • James Hansen releases codes and changes the raw data?
  • Anthony Watts releases preliminary results of weather station survey.
  • James Annan rebutts Steven Schwartz on CO2 Doubling.
Comments
Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
 
Fortran 77, now there's a warm and fuzzy memory! If the instruments don't meet +-0.1 degree accuracy there sure isn't much validity in those tenth of a degree trends, eh?

Posted on 10/05/2007 at 6:10:00 PM

 
Arrgh, Cap'in! Ye be truthful.

Posted on 09/19/2007 at 6:09:00 PM

 
Thanks for the info.

Posted on 09/17/2007 at 8:09:00 PM

 
Cool resources.

Posted on 09/16/2007 at 8:09:00 AM

 
Some more excellent research here. I'm gonna check out that website when I'm done with my lunch

Posted on 09/14/2007 at 9:09:00 AM

 
excellent article Captain. I love the title!

Posted on 09/13/2007 at 4:09:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
Advertisment