Will China Beat the United States Back to the Moon?

The Stakes in the New Space Race Are High

By Mark Whittington, published Sep 21, 2007
Published Content: 602  Total Views: 493,796  Favorited By: 25 CPs
Rating: 3.7 of 5
Recently, during an address on the space economy to coincide with the fiftieth anniversary of the start of the space age, NASA Administrator Michael Griffin made the assertion that China would beat the United States to the Moon. His remarks follow:

"I personally believe that China will be back on the Moon before we are. I think when that happens, Americans will not like it, but they will just have to not like it. I think we will see, as we have seen with China's introductory manned space flights so far, we will see again that nations look up to other nations that appear to be at the top of the technical pyramid, and they want to do deals with those nations. It's one of the things that made us the world's greatest economic power. So I think we'll be reinstructed in that lesson in the coming years and I hope that Americans will take that instruction positively and react to it by investing in those things that are the leading edge of what's possible."

Most people are not aware of the full scope of the Chinese space effort, which has political, economic, and military components. While there has been no announced Chinese humans to the Moon effort, much of what China is currently or is planning to do in space would tend to point there.

China's manned space effort seems to be designed to steadily increase China's space operations capabilities. The Shenzhou 5, which flew in 2003 with a single taikonaut (Chinese for astronaut), orbited the Earth for just over twenty one hours and proved China's capability to launch humans into space. Shenzhou 6, with two taikonauts, followed in 2005 and remained in space for five days. The crew performed some biomedical experiments while aloft, proving China's capability to maintain humans in space for slightly longer periods while doing science.

Future Shenzhou missions will feature space walks, rendezvous and docking, and longer duration missions. This follows the pattern of America's Mercury and Gemini programs, which preceded the Apollo lunar program and gradually improved America's space operational capabilities.

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 24
Next >>
 
The below posts are irrational and uneducated posts. The United States has been to the Moon, the "conspiracy" theorists have been proven wrong a long time ago. This proof was not provided by NASA, mind you, but by foriegn governments such as the U.K., Germany (the old East Germany monitored our Lunar transmissions), and Russia. Japan's JAXA recently sent hi-definition photos from their lunar orbiter of a descent module (with American flag). Also, the U. of California's Astronomical lab currently bounces lasers off of the mirrors purposely set up by our astronauts back in the 1970's. This is used to measure the Moon's distance. Any other questions refer to NASA. They have finally set a web link to answer these worthless questions, which probably cost the taxpayers a few million $. Also, remember the United States launches more people per mission, and more missions per year, than China has since their space program started 5 years ago. Also, read about the Orion CEV.

Posted on 06/20/2008 at 5:06:46 PM

 
It's funny how NASA had the technology to go to the moon in 1969 or whatever,Now it is 2008 and NASA still can't make it back to the moon until 2020 (very interesting). I think it is very clear NASA has never walked on the moon.Check out all the websites that have caught their lies

Posted on 01/08/2008 at 2:01:39 AM

 
It looks like that if Hillary Clinton is elected President, NASA's exploration program will be gutted to pay for other priorities, making it far more likely that the next person on the Moon will be a citizen of the Peoples' Republic of China.

Posted on 10/05/2007 at 11:10:00 AM

 
i dont get it

Posted on 10/01/2007 at 6:10:00 AM

 
The moon's been done. The USA has had a continuous sentient presence on Mars for over 1300 Martian days! It's the most amazing human exploration achievement since the moon landings, but because NASA and politicians have their egos wrapped around flyboy astronauts, the Mars Exploration Rovers mission doesn't get the credit it richly deserves. Unmanned exploration of space is where the payoff and spinoffs lie.

Posted on 09/24/2007 at 12:09:00 AM

 
The moon's been done. The USA has had a continuous sentient presence on Mars for over 1300 Martian days! It's the most amazing human exploration achievement since the moon landings, but because NASA has its ego wrapped around flyboy astronauts, the Mars Exploration Rovers mission doesn't get the credit it richly deserves. Unmanned exploration of space is where the payoff and spinoffs lie.

Posted on 09/24/2007 at 12:09:00 AM

 
I apologize for missing Tibet. I don't want to defend China. I'm just concerned that so many people around me are so scared of boogie men. The end result is that people will have less satisfying lives.

Posted on 09/23/2007 at 10:09:00 PM

 
The US space program distorted space economics and set back organic private space development by decades. We're just starting to recover. The PRC program is looking to be more of the same government dominated and market distorting poisoned pills. Private space ventures will happen and they'll likely carry all sorts of national flags along with them. As usual, somebody's going to do something stupid and shoot somebody and the governments will follow the private developments.

Posted on 09/23/2007 at 5:09:00 PM

 
BZ - China does occupy Tibet and threatens Tawain with invasion. China also, interestingly enough, claims large parts of Siberia as its own territory.

Posted on 09/23/2007 at 3:09:00 PM

 
Joe said: "Nobody seems to understand that the Chinese seek to claim the moon as its national territory by right of possession...The Chinese are seeking the same." And your proof, Joe, is what? An assertion? Because here on earth the Chinese are invading their neighbors like Japan and Korea and they ran out of space so they need the moon? And those fusion reactors are built and ready for that fusion fuel? It really cracks me up when people's irrational fears come out. Scary, slanty eyed, yellow men are just around the corner waiting to invade and make us their slaves.

Posted on 09/23/2007 at 3:09:00 PM

 
The USA went to the moon in 1969; to see the Chinese repeat that many decades later isn't impressive. Wow, China reaching 1969 technology! It almost makes you feel sorry for them. If the article replaced "China going to the moon" with "China going to Mars", THEN the idea of the USA falling behind would make sense. Claiming the moon as territory is non-sense, and the USA could easily reclaim it. It actually wouldn't be smart to just return to the moon anyway, only a plan to make a moonbase (if it's worth it) would make any sense. If China is going to do is repeat the Apollo project (ie glorified camping trips on the moon), then they will prove they still have several decades worth of space tech 'catching up' to do. That they beat the Soviets/Russians is the only noticeable claim they could make ("wow, we were second instead of them!") Big deal!

Posted on 09/23/2007 at 2:09:00 PM

 
"China, ruled by a totalitarian regime that asserts its power through force and terror" Are you sure you don't mean the United States?

Posted on 09/23/2007 at 2:09:00 PM

 
Maybe the X prize and Google moon challenge will help spur things in the right direction. The US Government moves way too slow, contrast it with the advancements made by T-space, Scaled, SpaceX, etc. The legacy space program led by NASA and Big Aerospace (Boeing, Lockmart, BAE, etc.) moves very slowly and costs a lot more than the newer, more agile, next-gen aerospace companies that are just now getting into space. Things could get VERY interesting! GO CHINA! We need the competition.

Posted on 09/23/2007 at 11:09:00 AM

 
Nobody seems to understand that the Chinese seek to claim the moon as its national territory by right of possession. It can do this with a single colony however small, accompanied by sufficient bombast from its home government threatening war on any trespassers. It will not make this claim until it has as the French say a 'fait-de-compleat' actual presence. A heavy laser installed in such a complex could probably deter any would be explorer/co-colonist operation by any other nation. They could see us from a really long way away. Do not entertain thoughts of this being silly! Look at what the Russians are claiming...seabed under open ocean thousands of miles from Russia under the north pole. The Russians are seeking oil and gas, resources. The Chinese are seeking the same. No matter what international law has said in the past. Might makes right in this latest validation of Von Clausevitz! That helium-3 is a good fusion fuel. It will work. Boron fusion will work as well, but

Posted on 09/23/2007 at 7:09:00 AM

 
Nobody seems to understand that the Chinese seek to claim the moon as its national territory by right of possession. It can do this with a single colony however small, accompanied by sufficient bombast from its home government threatening war on any trespassers. It will not make this claim until it has as the French say a 'fait-de-compleat' actual presence. A heavy laser installed in such a complex could probably deter any would be explorer/co-colonist operation by any other nation. They could see us from a really long way away. Do not entertain thoughts of this being silly! Look at what the Russians are claiming...seabed under open ocean thousands of miles from Russia under the north pole. The Russians are seeking oil and gas, resources. The Chinese are seeking the same. No matter what international law has said in the past. Might makes right in this latest validation of Von Clausevitz! That helium-3 is a good fusion fuel. It will work. Boron fusion will work as well, but

Posted on 09/23/2007 at 7:09:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 24
Next >>
Most Commented On