Living History by Hillary Rodham Clinton

By Barb Jensen, published Sep 28, 2007
Published Content: 53  Total Views: 17,435  Favorited By: 2 CPs
Rating: 4.2 of 5
When Living History by Hillary Rodham Clinton was published in 2003, it was a highly anticipated book. It was thought Ms. Clinton would discuss in depth the many problems that plagued her husband's administration.

With all the hoopla going on about the upcoming presidential election and Ms. Clinton being a Democratic front leader, I decided to read this book. I was very disappointed. The book gave no new insights into her early life or the time she spent as first lady.

The book basically was all about Ms. Clinton patting herself on the back and blaming others for her problems.

She said she had reservations at first about marrying her husband because she didn't know if she wanted to move to Arkansas of if she would fit in there. Yet, other biographers of her say she hesitated because she doubted that Mr. Clinton would be faithful. He dated other women when they were engaged and she suspected this trend would continue after they were married.

Ms. Clinton blames the Republicans for the downfall of her health care program. She says they didn't want it to succeed because it would make President Clinton look like a hero. Not wanting him to achieve that status, the Republicans worked hard to make sure the program didn't happen.

According to Ms. Clinton, Whitewater and Travelgate were both blown out of proportion by the Republicans in an effort to derail President Clinton's administration. She says they were totally innocent in both cases.

Ms. Clinton claims the windfall profit she made trading commodities was due to her astute financial insight and had nothing to do with insider trading. She blames the press for suggesting otherwise.

Other first ladies conduct their duties from the East Wing, yet Ms. Clinton, as first lady, had offices here as well as in the West Wing, which she doesn't fully explain why this was. Was it so she could, as some biographers suggest, she could keep an eye on President Clinton and the women coming and going from his office or because she was more involved in policy making than she is willing to admit? (It is highly possible that in 2009 Ms. Clinton will be able to claim the Oval Office as her own.)

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
 
Interesting review!

Posted on 09/30/2007 at 7:09:00 PM

 
Interesting review!

Posted on 09/30/2007 at 7:09:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
Most Commented On