Rhapsody Vs Napster Vs Yahoo Music Unlimited

There are so many different music subscription services out there, such as Rhapsody, Napster and Yahoo Music Unlimited, that who really knows which one is best? They all claim to have millions of songs, and all are - in certain respects - very similar. Over the
 past few weeks, I've tried out the free trial option for all three of the aforementioned services, and have come to the conclusion that there is a very clear "winner" amongst the three. My conclusion may come as a surprise, and I doubt very much that the service I like is the most popular... but it should be.

In comparing services such as these, I think it's important to figure out exactly what I'm looking for before I start comparing. I thought about it, and came up with the "features" I most want in a music subscription service.

1. Lots of Content
2. Fast Downloads
3. Good Quality Music
4. High Quality Music Player
5. Cost

Not all my above criteria are given equal weight. For instance, if a music service is completely free, but has nothing I want, then I won't use it, so having a lot of content is a bit more important to me than cost. I'll discuss the importance of each as I go over how the different services performed in my testing.

1. Lots Of Content - It's actually kind of hard to declare a winner in this category, since every person likes different types of music. I may be thrilled that Rhapsody and Yahoo seem to have a ton of Broadway musicals, but that may not make a difference to someone else. All I can say is that Rhapsody claims to have over 3 million songs, Yahoo Music Unlimited states they have over 2 million songs, and Napster says they have millions of songs (but doesn't put a number on it). In my book, all of those are pretty good, but certainly not record-breaking. The iTunes Store, by way of comparison, has more than all of them. At a recent presentation, Steve Jobs said that the iTunes Store now has more than 6 million songs available. So, the three I'm comparing are good, but could definitely improve. Winner in this category: toss up.

 
Comments 1 - 5 of 5  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Yeah, unfortunately a lot of what I wrote in this article is now obsolete or otherwise wrong. The article was written back in 2007, almost 2 years ago as I type this in June of 2009!

Posted on 06/06/2009 at 10:06:50 PM

Yahoo is a disaster for those of us who used Musicmatch's Music on Demand and who like classical music. Yahoo's Music Unlimited has almost no classical music. I suppose it's fine if you like the top 10 in every imaginable genre, but for me it's 1 on a scale of 10.

Posted on 01/10/2008 at 6:01:04 PM

The only problem with Yahoo's service is that you can't put the songs you download onto your portable device anymore. They discontinued that service. :(

Posted on 10/04/2007 at 2:10:00 PM

Good deal for you! Is that permanent, or just an introductory offer (kind of like how Comcast offers high-speed Internet for only $19.99 a month... but after 3 months it jumps back to $45.99 or whatever)?

Posted on 09/26/2007 at 10:09:00 PM

We pay $10 with the option to transfer to a portable device with Napster. We jumped on a special they were running.

Posted on 09/24/2007 at 9:09:00 PM

Comments 1 - 5 of 5