Why George W. Bush is Not a Fascist

By Brian Rice, published Jun 21, 2006
Published Content: 112  Total Views: 233,528  Favorited By: 10 CPs
Rating: 3.0 of 5
Before I begin, I must say that I'm approaching this material out of contempt for those who remain ignorant as to the actual nature of fascism and its place in history. Fascism is highly distinguishable from any mainstream political trends in the west, and dare I say George W. Bush cannot logically (or correctly) be labeled a fascist by any means, much less a Nazi. This articles seeks to distinguish between fascism/National Socialism and the neo-liberal policies of George W. Bush and the Republican party. 

Firstly, this is to all those whom find it suitable to label George W. Bush a nazi or a fascist. There are certain aspects to these respective ideologies that make any comparisons with Bush completely, and utterly false. First and foremost, we're going to examine fascist thought and the basic tenets of this beliefe. Perhaps the most widely accepted defining piece of contemporary literature on fascism was undertaken in The Authoritarian Personality by Stagner. Stagner developed a scale for the assessment of fascistic attitudes. Throughout his observations of German and Italian fascistic writings, he identified seven characteristic content areas: 1)nationalism, 2)imperialism, 3) militarism, 4) racial antagonism, 5) anti-radicalism, 6)middle-class consciousness, and 7) a benevolent despot or strong man philosophy of government. These trends, while perhaps only two of which are exemplifeid by mainstream politicians in the United States (nationalism and imperialism) are far from defining characteristics of the presence of any American fascist government. Simply looking at the psychology of many of the captured Nazis from WW2 indicates different characterization causes that separate Bush from fascism. What has since been defined by most political psychologists as an "authoritarian personality," this sense of sycophantic obedience towards higher authorties and sharing a common goal of statist supremacy are in staunch contradiction to the actions and beliefs of our current president. 

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
 
While I appreciate your definition, I think there are more "fascist" traits in the neo-conservative movement then you are willing to recongnize. Mysticism, fanatacism, rampant nationalism, etc..I do agree that the socialist side of fascism isn't in keeping with Mr. Bush. "Bourgeois Bush" is an apt description, but I think he likes the control aspects of a fascist model, and wouldn't mind at all applying them if given the chance.

Posted on 11/25/2007 at 12:11:00 PM

 
I don't accept your definition of fascism. Fascism: "A political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition." - Merriam Webster. Has anyone called the president a Nazi? That's just crazy.

Posted on 08/06/2007 at 7:08:00 PM

 
Good work!

Posted on 08/04/2007 at 7:08:00 PM

 
We're not calling him a Nazi. We're calling him a butthead!

Posted on 08/03/2007 at 4:08:00 PM

 
Too much nit-picking (Fascists do not have to be anti-semetic, although certainly Arabs are Semites as well as Jews)& I think a close reading of Stagner's seven characteristics would not eliminate the current neo-cons by any means. Thank you for undertaking an interesting & difficult subject.

Posted on 07/06/2007 at 1:07:00 PM

 
"A form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation or victimhood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy and purity, in which a mass-based party of committed nationalist militants, working in uneasy but effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons democratic liberties and pursues with redemptive violence and without ethical or legal restraints goals of internal cleansing and external expansion." [Robert O. Paxton, "The Anatomy of Fascism," 2004] I'm guessing there may be more than one definition of Facism. If the above does not fit Bush/Cheney et al then I'm not sure what would. I know you did a lot of work on your piece & it disturbs me that you have received so little feedback...but I'm afraid I'm not convinced of your premise. Too much nit-picking (Fascists do not have to be anti-semetic, although certainly Arabs are Semites as well as Jews)& I think a close reading of Stagner's seven characteristics would not elim

Posted on 07/06/2007 at 1:07:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
Most Commented On