Smoking: The Dark Side of the Truth

WARNING: Bugging Me About My Smoking Can Be Hazardous to Your Health

This is for all you smoking Nazi's out there. Yes, you lot, who through some sense of superiority to fallible man have determined that the smoking public's value has somehow been lessoned by an addictive drug more powerful than any vial thing out of the laboratories of science and
 chemistry in the last 200+ yrs.

Yes, I smoke. This affects me and several million others around the world, but it does NOT effect you. You have chosen to cut people who smoke out of your life. For better or for worse, this decision is yours to make. I don't judge you for that.

What I do judge you for, is what you do AFTER you judge us smokers.

DON'T TELL ME WHAT I ALREADY KNOW

I walked into a convenience store the other day. I was out of smokes. I had the money to pay for them in my hand, and I walked directly up to the empty counter and ordered my particular brand.

"Cigarettes Are Bad For You." a voice behind me said.

"Stupidity is worse." I retorted without turning around.

"What do you mean by that?" she snapped.

What I said next probably terrorized her more than I had initially intended, but the effect was the same. I turned to face her. She couldn't have been in college yet, maybe just old enough to start smoking.

"Lady, lets look at this logically." I started, "You believe that with all the negative advertising, all the warning labels, and all the little hints and tips, well meaning ladies, like yourself, drop on me in public places, like here, that; 'I don't know that cigarettes are bad'."

"What you fail to see" I continued, "is the obvious fact that; I am 40 years old, and you don't know me at all."

I paused for dramatic effect.

"But!" I continued, " You could have learned a little bit about me before you said anything at all, if you had paid attention."

"I'm dressed for riding that motorbike out there. Fact is I pulled into a convenience store and parked right up to the building. Ergo, I don't need gas. I probably have plenty in the tank." I explained.

"I didn't go to the cooler for beer, or to the snack isle, so chances are pretty good that I don't need those things.

"I came to the counter and asked for cigarettes. Why? I could be low, or I could be out of cigarettes.

 
Comments 1 - 5 of 5  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Amen brother. I just lit up when I saw this, and I make these same arguments every time someone confronts me about smoking. Here's some reading I strongly recommend: http://antibrains.com/shs.html :) Peace out and godspeed man.

Posted on 06/26/2008 at 3:06:54 AM

(Read my first post, two posts down, FIRST - then move up.) Nowadays, when you as an MD (usually a non-smoker or anti-smoker) what factors OTHER than smoking cause lung cancer, you usually get a blank stare ... or they fumble about in their thoughts until they realize that, yes, there are other causes. Among them - air pollution caused by autos/factories - home/workplace exposure to asbestos, radon, arsenic, chromium, nickel, etc. - being prone to other lung diseases by heredity - low sodium levels. I personally like the last one (grin). Eat too much salt and have high blood pressure that can kill you. Eat too little salt and you can be prone to lung cancer.

Posted on 10/24/2007 at 7:10:00 AM

(Read my prior post below FIRST.) My personal physician, a Marlboro smoker, told me that prior to 1965, the majority of sitting members (all MDs) on the AMA Board of Trustees were smokers. In 1965, non-smoking MDs (and anti-smoking MDs) became the majority. They pressured the FTC, who in turn pressured Congress, to place the first warning on packs. In 1969, they then pressured the Surgeon General to validate this warning with his title. But by 1981, NO smoking physicians sat on the board - and they pressured the FTC/Congress to up the total to 4 warnings. In short, the warnings are agenda-related, not necessarily fact-based.

Posted on 10/24/2007 at 7:10:00 AM

Here's a factoid you can use when encountering one of those people with a police state mentality. Although the first cigarette warning label appeared on packs in 1965 (in the US), the Surgeon General's name wasn't associated with it until 1969. And it wasn't until 1981 that the current 4 labels we see today were put into rotation on the packs. Of all of them, this one is the biggy: "SURGEON GENERAL'S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, Emphysema, and May Complicate Pregnancy." Since OTHER THINGS can cause the same problems, one wonders why they've not been similarly labled - and why tobacco was singled out. See next post above for the answer.

Posted on 10/24/2007 at 7:10:00 AM

Amen! I have quit smoking but I SURE do remember those idiotic comments. I always wondered.....what vices do THEY have that don't show??? I just happened to have a vice everyone could SEE and COMMENT on.

Posted on 10/01/2007 at 3:10:00 PM

Comments 1 - 5 of 5