What Makes Editors the Way They Are - A Tongue in Cheek Appraisal!

By Sreelata Menon, published Sep 26, 2007
Published Content: 2  Total Views: 349  Favorited By: 1 CPs
Rating: 3.5 of 5
Why editors are the way they are---

Have your pieces been mangled endlessly?

Have you been at the receiving end of an editor's arrogance lately?

Do you dread seeing your name at the top of a muddled and distorted piece?

Have you felt like committing hara kiri? Giving it all up? Packing it all in?

Don't! Hang on! It's not what you think!

Read on and discover why editors are the way they are, what could make them the way they are and feel better...

A promising theory---

I have a theory! It's a theory no self righteous editor is going to accept. But it's one I believe that all writers will lovingly embrace! And that is that most editors are a jealous lot! A lazy bunch! And how have I reached these preposterous conclusions? If you were a writer, you will undoubtedly agree and well if you were an editor, you might well want to dump me and the articles I might send you the next time, into the ubiquitous bin that sits next to you.

They know no better...

My conclusions are I'd like to plead, based on experience. Much rueful experience .Of having my masterpieces, such as they, are mutilated beyond repair by people, who should have known better but who didn't. There is much truth, in the adage that "those can (will) 'do', while those who cannot, 'don't'". Apply it to writers and editors and what do you have? Well those who 'can' will write and those who 'can't' will find great happiness in chopping, changing, cutting, rewriting something they would have liked to write but could not have written in a hundred years! Get my point?

Itchy fingers...

Did I really say it 'like' that; could I have actually written it 'that' way, you wonder for a disappointed moment. But thrilled at seeing you articles in print you couldn't care less and carry on blithely. But when it happens again and again, euphoria gives way to doubt, doubt to anger and anger to dejection. And when they do appear sometimes without any cuts, changes or rewrites you actually feel blessed! You begin to dread sending them in. You start to lose confidence, even wonder if your writing is at fault. No it's not. The very fact they are publishing it says it's not. It's only because God has itchy fingers!

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
 
I was so naive when I joined AC I actually thought I could look forward to long arguements with submissions returned with red lines and what ever those marks are called that they use in the real world. Even though I have asked in the forum I still have not figured out how to "argue" with AC editors about rejected pieces, as so many CP's claim they do. I don't like the proper grammer rules, so seldom submit for pay. I have seen a lot of AC articles that I would edit for clarity and other little things that make them less readable. I wish they would muddle in my stuff so I could learn to be a writer.

Posted on 09/27/2007 at 11:09:00 AM

 
Are you talking about AC editors? I wish they would do more muddling. Two paragraph "aricles" with many less than the standard 400 words showcased on the front page? Typos galore, overlooked. I could not believe that I clicked on a title yesterday that was one line saying "vote for me" (at blah, blah, blah). Where are the editors? I don't think AC editors actually read submissions and are just judging on if the article will bring readers due to tabloid headlines and such.

Posted on 09/27/2007 at 11:09:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
Most Commented On