Ethics in Shakespeare's "The Merchant of Venice"
By Jennifer Thompson, published Oct 05, 2007
Published Content: 411 Total Views: 205,547 Favorited By: 45 CPs
Embed:
Though Shakespeare's "The Merchant of Venice" is classified as a comedy, it poses three blatant issues which pose a question of ethics - at least to the modern mind. First and probably most obvious is the anti-Semitism, the story of Shylock. He is a money lender, and charges interest with which he makes his living. He is the major villain of the play, for the Christians see charging interest when lending money to be sinful. Shylock is seen to be a miser, as he strictly demands that his contracts be upheld. Antonio, for the sake of his friend Bassanio, goes to Shylock to borrow three thousand ducets for the term of three months. Shylock reminds Antonio that he has spat upon him, cursed him, insulted him, and yet he comes to him for needed money.
Antonio said that he is likely to continue to treat him in such a manner, and confronts Shylock with the immoral behavior of charging interest, and not lending as a gesture of friendship. Then Shylock tells Antonio that instead of charging him interest, they'll go to the notary, and should the note not be paid in full and on time, he'll instead take a pound of flesh from Antonio, from the body part which he should desire. Antonio agrees, as all of his cargo is expected in be in and sold a month before the note is due. However, when the ships don't come in on time due to varied causes, and it's time for Antonio to pay up, the two men end up in court -- which brings us to the second issue of ethics.
Portia, Bassanio's new wife, dresses up as a doctor of law in order to defend Antonio in court, not to Bassanio's knowledge. She dresses up as a man, as of course, women cannot be doctors of law. Therefore, Bassanio does not recognize the brilliant young esteemed lawyer as his wife. Portia has no training, no degree nor license, yet she goes to the court in disguise and takes Antonio's fate into her own hands. Though she had discussed legal strategy previously with Bassanio, she's had no preparation whatsoever. Granted, she pulls it off, though she was unethical in initially making the attempt. Not only does she spare Antonio his pound of flesh, but turns the case around putting Shylock on trial.
You may also like...
- Comedy and Darkness in The Merchant of V...
- The Agency and Eventual Punishment of th...
- Shylock's Humanity in Shakespeare's The ...
- The Merchant of Venice - Anti-Semitic or...
- The Merchant of Venice: Mythological Ref...
- Riddles in Shakespeare's Merchant of Ven...
- Organizational Aspects of Shakespeare's ...
- You Might be Quoting Shakespeare Without...
- Was Shakespeare a Fake?
- Understand Shakespeare Like a Pro
Most Commented On

Mafas
Add a Comment
Posted on 01/06/2008 at 11:01:56 AM
Jennifer Thompson
Add a Comment
Posted on 10/06/2007 at 8:10:00 PM
Charlotte Kuchinsky
Add a Comment
Posted on 10/06/2007 at 3:10:00 PM
Jeff Musall
Add a Comment
Posted on 10/05/2007 at 9:10:00 AM
Jeanne Marie Kerns
Add a Comment
Posted on 10/05/2007 at 9:10:00 AM