Breed Specific Legislation & American Dog Owner Rights

Breed Specific Legislation (BSL) is a big problem for dogs and dog owners, as well as for all citizens of the areas with these laws. BSL is when lawmakers enact laws or statutes that severely restrict or even prohibit pet owners
 from owning certain breeds of dog. Most often, the "pit bull" is the victim of BSL. Other breeds often targeted are often large breed dogs and include Rottweilers, Chow Chows, Dobermans, German Shepherds, Staffordshire Terriers, and Malamutes.

Proponents in favor of bsl state that restricting or outlawing certain breeds of dog will help to decrease dog bites and attacks. This, however, is far from the truth. Once a certain breed is outlawed in an area, another breed will take its place. Once that happens, the lawmakers will move to get that breed outlawed. If that continues, eventually, all dogs would be outlawed. The targeted breed changes generally once every 10 to 20 years. In the 1970's, Dobermans were the targeted breed. Then, in the 1990's, Rottweilers were the "bad breed"? Now, society has moved on to "pit bulls". Now the problem with that is there is no such breed as a pit bull. This general term encompasses three separate breeds, the Staffordshire Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, and American Pit Bull Terrier (APBT).

When BSL is enacted, society can lose some wonderful animals. Think about some of the service dogs in your area. The majority of service dogs are large breed dogs. Police forces use some of the targeted breeds for "drug dogs" and "bomb dogs". Therapy dogs are usually large breed dogs, as are search and rescue dogs. For instance, Helen Keller owned an APBT. Communities could also lose some wonderful icons. Petey on The Little Rascals was an APBT. The United States military used an APBT in it ads in the early 1900's. The only breed of dog to be on the cover of Life Magazine 3 times was the APBT.

Related information
  • Facts about BSL
  • Alternatives to BSL
  • Facts about dogs
 
Comments 1 - 5 of 5  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

whhhoo david you just jumped on the s.o.s.band wagon(stuck on stupid bandwagon) a responsible owner NEVER lets a dog(any kind) be in a area with a child alone. i have a rotty and a pitty 2 kids 5 cats the animals are NEVER left alone with the kids when i'm not home the dogs and cats have separted areas to call there own the cats have the basement and the dogs get upstairs with a soild door betwen them when the kids want to play with the dogs we the adults go with them. to teach the kids and the dogs to play together and to teach both how to play with the (bully breeds)safely .the dogs must know that kids are part of the pack and must be respected .i would like to know how many people have taught their kids the wrong things when it comes to dogs!! tons i suspect for the actions of todays people!!!

Posted on 03/13/2009 at 12:03:56 PM

Well, David, to respond to your comment I feel that I must let you know that a recent study by the US Humane Society showed that Labroador Retrievers were responsible for more dog bites in the last ten years than pit bulls and rottweilers combined.

Posted on 06/21/2008 at 10:06:33 AM

whooaaa whoaaa whoaaa there David... that is spurting some serious slander right there. Not all Pit-Bulls are vicious... I own one, she is quite docile. ANY dog... i repeat ANY dog [that is actually a dog and not some fuzzy football with legs or any yipping ankle biter] can possibly bite and kill a person... so like it says... blame the deed not the breed

Posted on 06/11/2008 at 8:06:32 PM

The term "Responsible pit-bull owner" is an oxymoron. It does not exist in the real world. It's the same thing as saying "safe drunk driver." Just as not every drunk driver gets into an accident, the thing to remember is that drunk drivers as a whole do kill and injure people. I have heard a lot of people say..."I have been driving drunk for years...never had an accident." It's the same story for people who own dangerous dogs...how many times have you seen a story on the news of some poor child being mauled by a dog whose owner said (and I am sure you can say it with me) "he never bit anyone before." Well that is almost ok...if the owner himself is the one to lose his face. But usually it's an innocent person...a human. I think all dangerous dogs should be outlawed and put to death. Society does not need them. And the owners of such dogs can never really be seen as "responsible" Responsible people weigh the risks of owning a beast that can and will kill people for no reason. Then decid

Posted on 04/30/2008 at 11:04:46 PM

I agree completely. BSL will do nothing to reduce dog bites, but will tear apart many families. (mine included) Fact of the matter is, many dogs are much more prone to bite humans, but being smaller do less damage and most of the time goes unreported. The answer is stricter laws reguarding pet ownership. Dogs ought to be registered, and certain breed should maybe be required to go through certain training. Good article.

Posted on 02/02/2008 at 5:02:29 PM

Comments 1 - 5 of 5