The Likelihood of the Moon Landings Being Faked

By Lara Tacita, published Oct 05, 2007
Published Content: 372  Total Views: 92,672  Favorited By: 4 CPs
Rating: 3.8 of 5
The idea that the moon landings in 1969 may have been faked is a popular conspiracy theory. One argument that took place on the Internet a few years ago had a proponent who supported the faked moon landings theory said the event took place in 1969. People who were more aware of the quickly corrected him and the less kind mocked the person in an appropriate fashion.

The idea despite the scientific flaws of the people making the claim will not go away. Unlike many conspiracy theories where wild accusations and the idea of a government cover-up persist, the people who insist that the government faked the moon landings as a hoax actually sound reasonable. The first argument against the moon landing possibility was that the astronauts in the Apollo space capsule would have been killed from the electromagnetic radiation that gets emitted in an area of space called the Van Allen radiation belt.

Another cryptic although important to the conspiracy theorists thing that is missing from the NASA footage of moon landings are the crosshairs that NASA placed on the camera. The crosshairs were directly inserted onto the camera lens in order to measure distances. If the footage were from the cameras that went to the moon, the conspiracy theorists argue, the crosshairs should show up in all the photography.

The lack of stars seen in the moon landing pictures is also pointed out as evidence of a government cover-up and an effort to fake the moon landings to fool the public, and furthermore the conspiracy theorists also point out the computing power of the computers used in the Apollo missions was not enough to get the astronauts there safely.

All of these factors and more cause the conspiracy theories to say that the moon landings could not have occurred, but if you read some of the more avid proponents of the theory in great detail, the efforts to create a moon landing hoax on the part of the government would have been far more difficult than the act of actually landing a lunar module on the dark side of the moon.

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
 
That one is the most easily debunked as there was trickery used to make the flag look like it was waving. The pole the astronauts used was *designed* to make it look like the flag was waving.

Posted on 10/14/2007 at 11:10:00 AM

 
Yeah, I really didn't get that second date being 1969. That sucks if the CP changed that. Anyway, the fake moon-landing conspiracy has always been intriguing to me and one argument I always heard that sounded very convincing was this: wasn't the US flag waving in the moon landing video? But there's no air, thus no wind, on the moon. You've explained some of the others away very well, but that's one that's always baffled me.

Posted on 10/14/2007 at 9:10:00 AM

 
Are you talking about me or the Roman Nymph I took my name from?

Posted on 10/06/2007 at 3:10:00 PM

 
The world was created on Lara Tacita's creation day ... all the 'histories' are just excuses for ever being without Lara Tacita.

Posted on 10/06/2007 at 3:10:00 PM

 
Chaning the second date that appears to 1969 instead of what the article originally said 1968 screws up the point of the article. Please leave my text alone if you are going to make inaccurate corrections, CMs.

Posted on 10/05/2007 at 6:10:00 PM

 
Interesting concept. Thank You fer sharin'. ;-}}>

Posted on 10/05/2007 at 2:10:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
Most Commented On