Find » Legal » Lowering the Drinking Age to 18: Wh...

Lowering the Drinking Age to 18: Why I Think It's Time

By Armen, published Oct 10, 2007
Published Content: 47  Total Views: 35,521  Favorited By: 10 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.5 of 5
There was a time in the United States when drinking alcohol was illegal. The question is, "Why did people still drink and import alcohol to the country if it was outlawed?" The truth is that people are going to get what they want despite the consequences. Today, drinking is legal if you are 21 or older. It seems like we are repeating the history and making the same mistakes that occurred in the past. Prohibition did not work then, and prohibition for young people under 21 is not working now.

The drinking age should be lowered to 18 giving young adults the permission to drink in controlled environments such as restaurants, bars and official school and university functions. Mature and sensibly drinking behavior could then be taught and educated. Why will lowering the drinking age to 18 make any difference?

According to a study made by Professor Ruth C. Engs from Indiana University, young adults under 21 are most likely to become heavy drinkers. The reason for that is because of the way young people think. In most cases, the fact that you need to be 21 to drink, makes teenagers under 21 feel like they need to drink because it is part being an adult. They know it is illegal, and it makes them more impatient to drink. If the drinking age was lowered to 18, these thoughts would not the same; young people wouldn't look at it the same since it would be available to them legally. This would change their opinion of drinking and they would begin to expect mature drinking. They would also feel less of a need for alcohol since it is accessible to them at anytime legally.

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 7 of 7
 
 
How many stop with 1 drink. Give me a break. Being a Puritan isn't the problem. Being incapable of controlling yourselves is the problem. Drunk Drivers are the problem. Dead children from drunk drivers is the problem. Irresponsible behavior is the problem. 18 is too inmature to be deciding if they are responsible or not. Soldiers are not responsible at 18. Just because they go to war doesn't make them smart. It only makes them patriotic or stupid.

Posted on 08/22/2008 at 7:08:16 AM

 
Why don't be just put in their bottles and train them from a young age to be stupid and irresponsible. Drinking only leads to problems. 18 or 85 it is trouble. This is all we need out on the roads is thousands of young, stupid, no driving kids being allowed to drink. They aren't responsible enough to keep their clothes on, much less be allowed to drink at that age. What a stupid article.

Posted on 06/09/2008 at 8:06:59 AM

 
In response to Matthew, if parents are training students to drink responsibly as you suggest then lowering the drinking age to 18 isn't a problem. Time we got rid of antiquated, Puritan (I mean that literally) ideas about alcohol that suggest one drink damns you to irresponsibility.

Posted on 03/11/2008 at 1:03:11 PM

 
I liked this one!

Posted on 10/26/2007 at 7:10:00 PM

 
**Clarification: I wrote below that lowering the drinking age would give "parents excuses NOT to let their kids..." However, I meant to write, lowering the drinking age would give "parents more excuses TO let their kids..."

Posted on 10/18/2007 at 5:10:00 PM

 
First of all, there is no research to show that lowering the drinking age to 18 would lower drinking and driving rates, as well as the amount of heavy drinkers. Instead, how about parents teach their high school kids responsibility of not drinking? I got along just fine without having a sip of beer or alcohol in my high school years. In my opinion, high school kids are too young to drink because some of them can't even predict the consequences of their own actions yet! Lowering the drinking age to 18 would only give high school kids more reason to drink, and only give more parents excuses NOT to let their kids have drinking parties at their houses. Your opinion is quite naive and I for one am glad that the drinking age is restricted to 21 in the United States, whether it "works" most places or not.

Posted on 10/18/2007 at 5:10:00 PM

 
You are absolutely right. Citing Europe is a perfect example. A lot of people do most of their drinking between 18 and 21, just because it's illegal. Once they turn 21, the mystique is gone, and it's no big deal. Parents should play a role too, introducing their children to alcohol themselves and teaching them the dangers, along with the social positives. Europeans introduce their children to wine at a young age, and it works.

Posted on 10/11/2007 at 10:10:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 7 of 7
 
Most Commented On