Response to Jeff Musall Editorial, Bush Again Shows His True Colors, Vetoes Health Care for Kids

I simply marvel at how you people that suffer from bush derangement syndrome never, ever fail to avoid the truth, parse the truth, use half a truth in every single argument on every single topic.. Or just flat out lie.. big, big in your face lies.. Then you can't help topping it off with a generous amount of "next to bush, if we just hate the rich a little bit more, we will all be O.K." You so conveniently left out for example, that "children" in this bill are defined as 24 years old or less.. Hey that means the son YOU fein such pain over demanding Bush assume the health coverage, for your son in the hopes that your neighbors and the government can be bullied into providing it for you. That's cute. That means your son would be a man/boy under this plan still leaching off of his poorer neighbors through the strong arm of the government.. well into the prime of his adult life but still called child health care.. But in the real world, single guys like him 25 or 30 don't mess with it.. it is costly and most likely not needed. It just makes sense.

You failed to mention that to qualify as "Poor" under this idiotic socialist bankrupting power enabling bill you have to earn LESS than $85K per year.. Yep, I did not stutter.. You are now POOR if you make $85K a year. SWEET-!! Oh, damn.. wait a minute, wait a minute..there is that real world again... you know the one you libs spend every waking moment in denial of.. because in THAT world you would discover that the cost of this legislation must come from somewhere and that means even more tax increases on us all.. which completes the cycle all you dems are so consumed with, which is acquiring power thru spending other peoples money after taking it by force of law, under the guise of, "its' for the children.." at least for the children that survived being aborted..